Skip to main content

Female Orgasm and In-Pair Copulation

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science

Introduction

Evolutionary analyses of human behavior characterize modern phenotypes as potential products of natural and sexual selection. Within evolutionary psychology, the human female orgasm generates debate as to an adaptive function because, compared to male orgasm and ejaculation, it is not required for fertilization (e.g., Lloyd 2009 and Puts and Dawood 2006). Evolutionary researchers have proposed two main theories offering adaptive explanations for the female orgasm (Puts et al. 2012a). These Mate-Choice Hypotheses argue that female orgasm increases the probability of producing offspring, thereby falling within the purview of natural selection. Of these adaptive hypotheses, the Pair-Bond Hypothesis would increase survival of offspring through women’s selection of long-term mates, while the Sire Choice Hypothesis focuses on orgasm’s potential to increases genetic quality of offspring through women’s selection of high-quality mates. We describe these models to frame current...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Acevedo, B. P. (2015). Neural correlates of human attachment: Evidence from fMRI studies of adult pair-bonding. In V. Zayas & C. Hazan (Eds.), Bases of adult attachment: Linking brain, mind, and behavior (pp. 185–194). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong, E. A., England, P., & Fogarty, A. C. (2012). Accounting for women’s orgasm and sexual enjoyment in college hookups and relationships. American Sociological Review, 77, 435–462.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker, R. R., & Bellis, M. A. (1993). Human sperm competition: Ejaculate manipulation by females and a function for the female orgasm. Animal Behaviour, 46(5), 887–909.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, M. D., Moore, J. M., Woolford, B. A., & Riggs, S. A. (2018). Interest in partner orgasm: Sex differences and relationships with attachment strategies. Personality and Individual Differences, 124, 194–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Black, C. J., & de Baca, T. C. (2018). MHC compatibility. In T. K. Shackelford & V. A. Weekes-Shackelford (Eds.), Encyclopedia of evolutionary psychological science. Cham: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brody, S., & Weiss, P. (2010). Vaginal orgasm is associated with vaginal (not clitoral) sex education, focusing mental attention on vaginal sensations, intercourse duration, and a preference for a longer penis. The Journal of Sexual Medicine, 7(8), 2774–2781.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brody, S., Costa, R. M., Hess, U., & Weiss, P. (2011). Vaginal orgasm is related to better mental health and is relevant to evolutionary psychology: A response to Zietsch et al. The Journal of Sexual Medicine, 8(12), 3523–3525.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, R. D., & Hatfield, E. (1989). Gender differences in receptivity to sexual offers. Journal of Psychology & Human Sexuality, 2(1), 39–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clifford, R. (1978). Development of masturbation in college women. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 7(6), 559–573.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, D. L., & Belsky, J. (2008). Avoidant romantic attachment and female orgasm: Testing an emotion-regulation hypothesis. Attachment & Human Development, 10, 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conley, T. D., Piemonte, J. L., Gusakova, S., & Rubin, J. D. (2018). Sexual satisfaction among individuals in monogamous and consensually non-monogamous relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 35, 509–531.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costa, R. M., & Brody, S. (2007). Women’s relationship quality is associated with specifically penile-vaginal intercourse orgasm and frequency. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 33, 319–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costa, R. M., & Brody, S. (2011). Anxious and avoidant attachment, vibrator use, anal sex, and impaired vaginal orgasm. The journal of sexual medicine, 8(9), 2493–2500.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dawood, K., Kirk, K. M., Bailey, J. M., Andrews, P. W., & Martin, N. G. (2005). Genetic and environmental influences on the frequency of orgasm in women. Twin Research and Human Genetics, 8(1), 27–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ellsworth, R. M., & Bailey, D. H. (2013). Human female orgasm as evolved signal: A test of two hypotheses. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 42(8), 1545–1554.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Eschler, L. (2004). The physiology of the female orgasm as a proximate mechanism. Sexualities, Evolution & Gender, 6, 171–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, H. (2004). Why we love: The nature and chemistry of romantic love. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fletcher, G. J., Simpson, J. A., Campbell, L., & Overall, N. C. (2015). Pair-bonding, romantic love, and evolution: The curious case of Homo sapiens. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 10, 20–36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Foldes, P., & Buisson, O. (2009). Reviews: the clitoral complex: a dynamic sonographic study. The journal of sexual medicine, 6(5), 1223–1231.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gallup, G. G., Jr., Ampel, B. C., Wedberg, N., & Pogosjan, A. (2014). Do orgasms give women feedback about mate choice. Evolutionary Psychology, 12(5), 147470491401200507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallup, G. G., Jr., Towne, J. P., & Stolz, J. A. (2018). An evolutionary perspective on orgasm. Evolutionary Behavioral Sciences, 12(1), 52–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallup, G. G., Burch, R. L., & Mitchell, T. J. B. (2006). Semen displacement as a sperm competition strategy. Human Nature, 17(3), 253–264.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gangestad, S. W., & Thornhill, R. (1997). The evolutionary psychology of extrapair sex: The role of fluctuating asymmetry. Evolution and Human Behavior, 18(2), 69–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gangestad, S. W., & Simpson, J. A. (2000). Trade-offs, the allocation of reproductive effort, and the evolutionary psychology of human mating. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23(4), 624–636.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gangestad, S. W., Simpson, J. A., Cousins, A. J., Garver-Apgar, C. E., & Christensen, P. N. (2004). Women’s preferences for male behavioral displays change across the menstrual cycle. Psychological Science, 15(3), 203–207.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Garver-Apgar, C. E., Gangestad, S. W., Thornhill, R., Miller, R. D., & Olp, J. J. (2006). Major histocompatibility complex alleles, sexual responsivity, and unfaithfulness in romantic couples. Psychological Science, 17(10), 830–835.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gebhard, P. H. (1966). Factors in marital orgasm. Journal of Social Issues, 22, 88–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gebhard, P. H., Raboch, J., & Giese, H. (1970). The sexuality of women. New York: Stein and Day.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hald, G. M., & Høgh-Olesen, H. (2010). Receptivity to sexual invitations from strangers of the opposite gender. Evolution and Human Behavior, 31(6), 453–458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, J. M., Cherkas, L. F., Kato, B. S., Heiman, J. R., & Spector, T. D. (2008). Normal variations in personality are associated with coital orgasmic infrequency in heterosexual women: A population-based study. The Journal of Sexual Medicine, 5(5), 1177–1183.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Herberich, E., Hothorn, T., Nettle, D., & Pollet, T. (2010). A re-evaluation of the statistical model in Pollet and Nettle 2009. Evolution and Human Behavior, 31, 150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hrdy, S. B. (1979). The evolution of human sexuality: The latest word and the last. Quarterly Review of Biology, 54, 309–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaighobadi, F., Shackelford, T. K., & Weekes-Shackelford, V. A. (2012). Do women pretend orgasm to retain a mate? Archives of Sexual Behavior, 41, 1121–1125.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, J., & Pavličev, M. (2018). Female orgasm and the emergence of prosocial empathy: An evo-devo perspective. Journal of Experimental Zoology Part B: Molecular and Developmental Evolution, 330, 66–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King, R., & Belsky, J. (2012). A typological approach to testing the evolutionary functions of human female orgasm. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 41, 1145–1160.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • King, R., Belsky, J., Mah, K., & Binik, Y. (2011). Are there different types of female orgasm? Archives of Sexual Behavior, 40(5), 865–875.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Little, A. C., Jones, B. C., & DeBruine, L. M. (2011). Facial attractiveness: Evolutionary based research. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 366(1571), 1638–1659.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd, E. A. (2009). The case of the female orgasm: Bias in the science of evolution. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McClintock, M. K. (1981). Social control of the ovarian cycle and the function of estrous synchrony. American Zoologist, 21(1), 243–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meston, C. M., Levin, R. J., Sipski, M. L., Hull, E. M., & Heiman, J. R. (2004). Women’s orgasm. Annual Review of Sex Research, 15(1), 173–257.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Morris, D. (1967). The Naked Ape. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patch, E. A., Black, C. J., Amoa-Awuah, E. & Armas, A. (In preparation). Eight steps to ecstasy: Women’s pleasure in relationships.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollet, T. V., & Nettle, D. (2009). Market forces affect patterns of polygyny in Uganda. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(7), 2114–2117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pollet, T. V., & Nettle, D. (2010). Correction: “Partner wealth predicts self-reported orgasm frequency in a sample of Chinese women”. New York: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prause, N. (2011). The human female orgasm: Critical evaluations of proposed psychological sequelae. Sexual and Relationship Therapy, 26(4), 315–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Puts, D. A. (2005). Mating context and menstrual phase affect women’s preferences for male voice pitch. Evolution and Human Behavior, 26(5), 388–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Puts, D. A., & Dawood, K. (2006). The evolution of female orgasm: Adaptation or byproduct? Twin Research and Human Genetics, 9, 467–472.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Puts, D. A., Dawood, K., & Welling, L. L. (2012a). Why women have orgasms: An evolutionary analysis. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 41, 1127–1143.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Puts, D. A., Welling, L. L., Burriss, R. P., & Dawood, K. (2012b). Men’s masculinity and attractiveness predict their female partners’ reported orgasm frequency and timing. Evolution and Human Behavior, 33, 1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shackelford, T. K., Weekes-Shackelford, V. A., LeBlanc, G. J., Bleske, A. L., Euler, H. A., & Hoier, S. (2000). Female coital orgasm and male attractiveness. Human Nature, 11, 299–306.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sherlock, J., Sidari, M., Harris, E., Barlow, F., & Zietsch, B. (2016). Testing the mate-choice hypothesis of the female orgasm: Disentangling traits and behaviours. Socioaffective Neuroscience & Psychology, 6, 1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Symons, D. (1979). The evolution of human sexuality. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tavris, C., & Sadd, S. (1977). The redbook report on female sexuality. New York: Delacorte Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thornhill, R., & Gangestad, S. W. (1996). The evolution of human sexuality. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 11(2), 98–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thornhill, R., Gangestad, S. W., & Comer, R. (1995). Human female orgasm and mate fluctuating asymmetry. Animal Behaviour, 50(6), 1601–1615.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trivers, R. (1972). Parental investment and sexual selection. Sexual Selection & the Descent of Man (pp. 136–179). New York: Aldine de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Udry, J. R., & Morris, N. M. (1968). Distribution of coitus in the menstrual cycle. Nature, 220(5167), 593.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wallen, K. (2006). Commentary on Puts’ (2006) review of the case of the female orgasm: Bias in the science of evolution. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 35, 633–636.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wasser, S. K. (1983). Social behavior in female vertebrates. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wasser, S. K., & Waterhouse, M. L. (1983). The establishment and maintenance of sex biases. In Social behavior of female vertebrates (pp. 19–33). New York: Academic Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Welling, L. L. M. (2014). Female orgasm. In V. A. Weekes-Shackelford, T. K. Shackelford, & R. D. Hansen (Eds.), Evolutionary perspectives on human sexual psychology and behavior (pp. 223–241). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Wheatley, J. R., & Puts, D. A. (2015). Evolutionary science of female orgasm. In T. K. Shackelford & R. D. Hansen (Eds.), The evolution of sexuality (pp. 123–148). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wildt, L., Kissler, S., Licht, P., & Becker, W. (1998). Sperm transport in the human female genital tract and its modulation by oxytocin as assessed by hysterosalpingoscintigraphy, hysterotonography, electrohysterography and Doppler sonography. Human Reproduction Update, 4(5), 655–666.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zak, P. J., Kurzban, R., & Matzner, W. T. (2004). The neurobiology of trust. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1032, 224–227.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zervomanolakis, I., Ott, H. W., Hadziomerovic, D., Mattle, V., Seeber, B. E., Virgolini, I., et al. (2007). Physiology of upward transport in the human female genital tract. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1101(1), 1–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zietsch, B. P., & Santtila, P. (2011). Genetic analysis of orgasmic function in twins and siblings does not support the by-product theory of female orgasm. Animal Behaviour, 82(5), 1097–1101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zietsch, B. P., Miller, G. F., Bailey, J. M., & Martin, N. G. (2011). Female orgasm rates are largely independent of other traits: Implications for “female orgasmic disorder” and evolutionary theories of orgasm. The Journal of Sexual Medicine, 8(8), 2305–2316.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Candace Jasmine Black .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Black, C.J., Patch, E.A., Taylor, D. (2019). Female Orgasm and In-Pair Copulation. In: Shackelford, T., Weekes-Shackelford, V. (eds) Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6_3665-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6_3665-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-16999-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-16999-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Behavioral Science and PsychologyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics