Skip to main content

Relationship Dissolution

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science
  • 20 Accesses

Synonyms

Breakup; Conjugal dissolution; Divorce

Definition

The process of ending a relationship by the voluntary action of at least one partner

Introduction

Most ancestral mammalian species didn’t form long-term male-female pair bonds. Males mated with estrous females, and when the female went out of estrus, the relationship ended. Dissolution only became an issue when the human species came into existence, at which time males and females began living together in long-term relationships. During the hunting and gathering era, the dissolution of these relationships was apparently simple and without serious consequences, either for the couple or their offspring. However, following the development of agriculture, dissolution became more problematic. Children needed paternal investment from a biological father, accumulated wealth made inheritance possible and paternity important, and rising religions condemned adultery and divorce.

Currently, in many societies, relationship dissolution is...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Axinn, W. G., & Thornton, A. (1992). The relationship between cohabitation and divorce: Selectivity or causal influence? Demography, 29, 357–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ayoub, C. C., Deutsch, R. M., & Maraganore, A. (1999). Emotional distress in children of high-conflict divorce. Family Court Review, 37, 297–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balikci, A. (1970). The Netsilik Eskimo. Garden City: Natural History Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beach, F. A. (1976). Cross-species comparisons and the human heritage. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 5, 469–485.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bermant, G. (1976). Sexual behavior: Hard times with the Coolidge effect. In M. H. Siegel & H. P. Zeigler (Eds.), Psychological research: The inside story. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Betzig, L. (1989). Causes of conjugal dissolution: A cross-cultural study. Current Anthropology, 30, 654–676.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Critchlow, D. T. (Ed.). (1996). The politics of abortion and birth control in historical perspective. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Waal, F. (1989). Chimpanzee politics: Power and sex among apes. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewsbury, D. A. (1981). Effects of novelty on copulatory behavior: The Coolidge effect and related phenomena. Psychological Bulletin, 89(3), 464–482.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Draper, P., & Harpending, H. (1982). Father absence and reproductive strategy: An evolutionary perspective. Journal of Anthropological Research, 38, 255–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunbar, R. I. M. (1995). The mating system of callitrichid primates: Conditions for the coevolution of pair bonding and twinning. Animal Behaviour, 50, 1057–1070.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gray, J. (1971). The psychology of fear and stress. New York: McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greiling, H., & Buss, D. M. (1999). Women’s sexual strategies: The hidden dimension of extrapair mating. Personality and Individual Differences, 28, 929–963.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kinsey, A. C., Pomeroy, W. B., & Martin, C. E. (1961). Sexual behavior in the human male. Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kummer, H. (1968). Two variations in the social organization of baboons. In P. Jay (Ed.), Primates: Studies in adaptation and variability (pp. 293–312). New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lancaster, J. B. (1975). Primate behavior and the emergence of human culture. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langergraber, K. E., et al. (2013). Male–female socio-spatial relationships and reproduction in wild chimpanzees. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 67, 861–873.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, R. B. (1979). The !Kung San: Men, women and work in a foraging society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, R. B., & Devore, I. (Eds.). (1976). Kalahari hunter-gatherers. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcen, M. (2015). Divorce and the birth control pill in the U.S. 1950–85. Feminist Economics, 21, 151–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marston, A. (1997). Planning for love: The politics of prenuptial agreements. Stanford Law Review, 49, 887–916.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Masters, W. H., & Johnson, V. E. (1966). Human sexual response. Boston: Little Brown and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milligan, J. (2005). A house of her own. Mortgage Banking, 65, 60+.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morton, H., & Gorzalka, B. B. (2015). Role of partner novelty in sexual functioning: A review. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, 41, 593.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nakonezny, P. A., Shull, R. D., & Rodgers, J. L. (1995). The effect of no-fault divorce law on the divorce rate across the 50 states and its relation to income, education, and religiosity. Journal of Marriage and Family, 57, 477–488.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plaud, J. J., & Gaither, G. A. (1997). A clinical investigation of the possible effects of long-term habituation of sexual arousal in assisted covert sensitization. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 28, 281–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt, D. P., Shackelford, T. K., Duntley, J., Tooke, W., & Buss, D. M. (2001). The desire for sexual variety as a tool for understanding basic human mating strategies. Personal Relationships, 8, 425–455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shostak, M. (1981). Nisa: The life and words of a !Kung woman. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stokes, C. E., & Ellison, C. G. (2010). Religion and attitudes toward divorce laws among U.S. adults. Journal of Family Issues, 31(10), 1279–1304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Symons, D. (1979). The evolution of human sexuality. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tonkinson, R. (1978). The Mardudjara aborigines: Living the dream in Australia’s desert. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turnbull, C. M. (1961). The Forest people. New York: Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Lawick-Goodall, J. (1971). In the shadow of man. New York: Dell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, G. D. (1982). The Coolidge effect. New York: William Morrow and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolman, R., & Taylor, K. (1991). Psychological effects of custody disputes on children. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 9, 377–417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zagorsky, J. A. (2005). Marriage and divorce’s impact on wealth. Journal of Sociology, 41, 406–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. Gary Bernhard .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Bernhard, J.G., Glantz, K. (2019). Relationship Dissolution. In: Shackelford, T., Weekes-Shackelford, V. (eds) Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6_2923-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6_2923-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-16999-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-16999-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Behavioral Science and PsychologyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics