Skip to main content

Soybean (Glycine max) Transformation Using Mature Cotyledonary Node Explants

  • Protocol
Agrobacterium Protocols

Part of the book series: Methods in Molecular Biology ((MIMB,volume 343))

Summary

Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated transformation of soybeans has been steadily improved since its development in 1988. Soybean transformation is now possible in a range of genotypes from different maturity groups using different explants as sources of regenerable cells, various selectable marker genes and selective agents, and different A. tumefaciens strains. The cotyledonary-node method has been extensively investigated and across a number of laboratories yields on average greater than 1% transformation efficiency (one Southern-positive, independent event per 100 cotyledonary-node explants). Continued improvements in the cotyledonary-node method concomitant with further increases in transformation efficiency will enhance broader adoption of this already productive transformation method for use in crop improvement and functional genomics research efforts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Protocol
USD 49.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. McCabe, D. E., Swain, W. F., Martinell, B. J., and Christou, P. (1988) Stable transformation of soybean (Glycine max) by particle acceleration. Bio/Technology 6, 923–926.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Parrott, W. A., Hoffman, L. M., Hildebrand, D. F., Williams, E. G., and Collins, G. B. (1989) Recovery of primary transformants of soybean. Plant Cell Rep. 7, 615–617.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Finer, J. J. and McMullen, M. D. (1991) Transformation of soybean via particle bombardment of embryogenic suspension culture tissue. In Vitro Cell Devel. Biol. 27P, 175–182.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Ko, T. S., Lee, S., Krasnyanski, S., and Korban, S. S. (2003) Two critical factors are required for efficient transformation of multiple soybean cultivars: Agrobacterium strain and orientation of immature cotyledonary explant. Theor. Appl. Genet. 107, 439–447.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Yan, B., Reddy, M. S. S., Collins, G. B., and Dinkins, R. D. (2000) Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated transformation of soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merrill] using immature zygotic cotyledon explants. Plant Cell Rep. 19, 1090–1097.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Ko, T.-S., Sangman, L., Farrand, S. K., and Korban, S. S. (2004) A partially disarmed vir helper plasmid, pKYRT1, in conjunction with 2,4-dichlorophenoxy-acetic acid promotes emergence of regenerable transgenic somatic embryos from immature cotyledons of soybean. Planta 218, 536–541.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Trick, H. N. and Finer, J. J. (1998) Sonication-assisted Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merrill] embryogenic suspension culture tissue. Plant Cell Rep. 17, 482–488.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Martinell, B. J., Julson, L. S., Emler, C. A., et al. (2002) Soybean Agrobacterium transformation method. U.S. Patent Application No. 6384301.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Aragao, F. J. L., Sarokin, L., Vianna, G. R., and Rech, E. L. (2000) Selection of transgenic meristematic cells utilizing a herbicidal molecule results in recovery of fertile transgenic soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merrill] plants at a high frequency. Theor. Appl. Genet. 101, 1–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Liu, H.-K., Yang, C., and Wei, Z.-M. (2004) Efficient Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated transformation of soybeans using an embryonic tip regeneration system. Plant Cell Rep. 219, 1042–1049.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Hinchee, M. A. W., Connor-Ward, D. V., Newell, C. A., et al. (1988) Production of transgenic soybean plants using Agrobacterium-mediated DNA transfer. Bio/Technology 6, 915–922.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Trick, H. N., Dinkins, R. D., Santarem, E. R., et al. (1997) Recent advances in soybean transformation. Plant Tissue Culture Biotechnol. 3, 9–26.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Olhoft, P. M., Lin, K., Galbraith, J., Nielsen, N. C., and Somers, D. A. (2001) The role of thiol compounds in increasing Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of soybean cotyledonary-node cells. Plant Cell Rep. 20, 731–737.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Olhoft, P. M. and Somers, D. A. (2001) L-cysteine increases Agrobacterium-mediated T-DNA delivery into soybean cotyledonary-node cells. Plant Cell Rep. 20, 706–711.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Olhoft, P. M., Flagel, L. E., Donovan, C. M., and Somers, D. A. (2003) Efficient soybean transformation using hygromycin B selection in the cotyledonary-node method. Planta 216, 723–735.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Zhang, Z., Xing, A., Staswick, P., and Clemente, T. (1999) The use of glufosinate as a selective agent in Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of soybean. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Culture 56, 37–46.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Zeng, P., Vadnais, D. A., Zhang, Z., and Polacco, J. C. (2003) Refined glufosinate selection in Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merrill]. Plant Cell Rep. 22, 478–482.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Olhoft, P. M., Flagel, L. E., and Somers, D. A. (2004) T-DNA locus structure in a large population of soybean plants transformed using the Agrobacterium-mediated cotyledonary-node method. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2, 289–300.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Donaldson, P. A. and Simmonds, D. H. (2000) Susceptibility to Agrobacterium tumefaciens and cotyledonary node transformation in short-season soybean. Plant Cell Rep. 19, 478–484.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Somers, D., Olhoft, P., Makarevitch, I., and Svitashev, S., (2004) Mechanism(s) of transgene locus formation, in Genetic Transformation in Crop Plants (LIANG, G. and SKINNER, D., eds.), Haworth Press, NY, pp. 17–69.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Somers, D. A. and Makarevitch, I. (2004) Transgene integration in plants: poking or patching holes in promiscuous genomes? Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 15, 126–131.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Humana Press Inc.

About this protocol

Cite this protocol

Olhoft, P.M., Donovan, C.M., Somers, D.A. (2006). Soybean (Glycine max) Transformation Using Mature Cotyledonary Node Explants. In: Wang, K. (eds) Agrobacterium Protocols. Methods in Molecular Biology, vol 343. Humana Press. https://doi.org/10.1385/1-59745-130-4:385

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1385/1-59745-130-4:385

  • Publisher Name: Humana Press

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-58829-536-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-59745-130-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Protocols

Publish with us

Policies and ethics