Skip to main content

A Corneal Scarring Model

  • Protocol
  • First Online:
Wound Regeneration and Repair

Part of the book series: Methods in Molecular Biology ((MIMB,volume 1037))

Abstract

Corneal opacification (i.e., haze) following a non-denaturing acute injury to the cornea is a process which takes about 5 days to manifest itself, indicating that it is the consequence of cellular and molecular biological processes. In order to obtain a better understanding of the haze development process, and to test candidate anti-haze therapies, we use a corneal scarring model whereby we create an excimer laser wound in the center of rabbit corneas. The primary data generated by this model are (1) changes in corneal thickness with time; (2) wound closure rates, or re-epithelialization; (3) changes in the location and density of corneal sub-epithelial haze; and (4) molecular and histological changes leading up to, during, and following the formation of haze.

While the use of excimer lasers to generate consistent wounds in rabbit corneas is not a novel protocol for the study of corneal haze, the photographic technique presented here for the more objective recording and quantification of corneal haze is. At present, a qualitative, semiquantitative, grading system is employed whereby the amount of iris detail discernible through the scar is assigned a value between 0 and 4. Such a system makes direct comparisons amongst reported anti-haze trials nearly impossible. Furthermore, the additional “geographic” detail provided by the image provides a new layer of information about the formation of haze and the ability to troubleshoot dosing regimens. Altogether, with the information present herein, we believe that the study of corneal haze formation and the ability to compare and contrast candidate therapies are both greatly improved.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Protocol
USD 49.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Moller-Pedersen T (2004) Keratocyte reflectivity and corneal haze. Exp Eye Res 78:553

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Dawson DG et al (2005) Ex vivo confocal microscopy of human LASIK corneas with histologic and ultrastructural correlation. Ophthalmology 112:634

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Sridhar MS, Rapuano CJ, Cosar CB, Cohen EJ, Laibson PR (2002) Phototherapeutic keratectomy versus diamond burr polishing of Bowman’s membrane in the treatment of recurrent corneal erosions associated with anterior basement membrane dystrophy. Ophthalmology 109:674

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Reidy JJ et al (1996) Comparison of corneal epithelial wound healing after photorefractive and lamellar keratectomy. J Refract Surg 12:352

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Tuft SJ, Zabel RW, Marshall J (1989) Corneal repair following keratectomy. A comparison between conventional surgery and laser photoablation. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 30:1769

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Szerenyi KD, Campos M, McDonnell PJ (1994) Prostaglandin E2 production after lamellar keratectomy and photorefractive keratectomy. J Refract Corneal Surg 10:413

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Bokosky JE, Meyer RF, Sugar A (1985) Surgical treatment of calcific band keratopathy. Ophthalmic Surg 16:645

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Lance SE, Capone A Jr, SundarRaj N, Roat MI, Thoft RA (1988) Diamond burring and surgical keratectomy. Morphologic comparison in the rabbit. Arch Ophthalmol 106:830

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Malta JB, Soong HK (2008) Diamond burr superficial keratectomy in the treatment of visually-significant anterior corneal lesions. Arq Bras Oftalmol 71:415

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Ramamurthi S, Rahman MQ, Dutton GN, Ramaesh K (2006) Pathogenesis, clinical features and management of recurrent corneal erosions. Eye (Lond) 20:635

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Schipper I (2003) Diamond burr polishing. Ophthalmology 110:1855, author reply 1855

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Soong HK, Farjo Q, Meyer RF, Sugar A (2002) Diamond burr superficial keratectomy for recurrent corneal erosions. Br J Ophthalmol 86:296

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Tzelikis PF, Rapuano CJ, Hammersmith KM, Laibson PR, Cohen EJ (2005) Diamond burr treatment of poor vision from anterior basement membrane dystrophy. Am J Ophthalmol 140:308

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Wong VW, Chi SC, Lam DS (2009) Diamond burr polishing for recurrent corneal erosions: results from a prospective randomized controlled trial. Cornea 28:152

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this protocol

Cite this protocol

Gibson, D.J., Schultz, G.S. (2013). A Corneal Scarring Model. In: Gourdie, R., Myers, T. (eds) Wound Regeneration and Repair. Methods in Molecular Biology, vol 1037. Humana Press, Totowa, NJ. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-62703-505-7_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-62703-505-7_16

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Humana Press, Totowa, NJ

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-62703-504-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-62703-505-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Protocols

Publish with us

Policies and ethics