Abstract
Transcript profiling is an invaluable strategy to study differential gene expression. Here we describe a detailed protocol for applying a subtractive hybridization technique, representational difference analysis (RDA), as a molecular strategy for the identification of differentially expressed genes in studies of host-fungus interaction. Bioinformatics tools that can be used in the analysis of expressed sequence tags (ESTs) are also detailed.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Lisitsyn, N.A.(1995) Representational difference analysis: finding the differences between genomes. Trends Genet. 11(8): 303–7.
Hubank, M. and D.G. Schatz (1994) Identifying differences in mRNA expression by representational difference analysis of cDNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 22(25): 5640–8.
Pastorian, K., L. Hawel, 3rd, and C.V. Byus (2000) Optimization of cDNA representational difference analysis for the identification of differentially expressed mRNAs. Anal Biochem. 283(1): 89–98.
Cano, L.E., L.M. Singer-Vermes, C.A. Vaz, M. Russo and V.L. Calich (1995) Pulmonary paracoccidioidomycosis in resistant and susceptible mice: relationship among progression of infection, bronchoalveolar cell activation, cellular immune response, and specific isotype patterns. Infect Immun. 63(5): 1777–83.
Fradin, C., M. Kretschmar, T. Nichterlein, C. Gaillardin, C. d’Enfert and B. Hube (2003) Stage-specific gene expression of Candida albicans in human blood. Mol Microbiol. 47(6): 1523–43.
Ewing, B. and P. Green (1998) Base-calling of automated sequencer traces using phred. II. Error probabilities. Genome Res. 8(3): 186–94.
Altschul, S.F.,T.L. Madden, A.A. Schaffer, J. Zhang, Z. Zhang, W. Miller and D.J. Lipman (1997) Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res. 25(17): 3389–402.
Audic, S. and J.M. Claverie (1997) The significance of digital gene expression profiles. Genome Res. 7(10): 986–95.
Costa, M., C.L. Borges, A.M. Bailão, G.V. Meirelles, Y.A. Mendonca, S.F Dantas, F.P. de Faria, et al. (2007) Transcriptome profiling of Paracoccidioides brasiliensis yeast-phase cells recovered from infected mice brings new insights into fungal response upon host interaction. Microbiology. 153: 4194–207.
Bailão, A.M., A. Schrank, C.L. Borges, V. Dutra, E.E. Walquiria Ines Molinari-Madlum, M.S. Soares Felipe, M.J. Soares Mendes-Gianinni, et al.(2006) Differential gene expression by Paracoccidioides brasiliensis in host interaction conditions: representational difference analysis identifies candidate genes associated with fungal pathogenesis. Microbes Infect. 8: 2686–97.
Ashburner, M., C.A. Ball, J.A. Blake, D. Botstein, H. Butler, J.M. Cherry, A.P Davis, et al.(2000) Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology. The Gene Ontology Consortium. Nat Genet. 25: 25–9.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this protocol
Cite this protocol
Bailão, A.M., Pereira, M., Salem-Izacc, S.M., Borges, C.L., de Almeida Soares, C.M. (2012). Transcript Profiling Using ESTs from Paracoccidioides brasiliensis in Models of Infection. In: Brand, A., MacCallum, D. (eds) Host-Fungus Interactions. Methods in Molecular Biology, vol 845. Humana, Totowa, NJ. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-61779-539-8_26
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-61779-539-8_26
Published:
Publisher Name: Humana, Totowa, NJ
Print ISBN: 978-1-61779-538-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-61779-539-8
eBook Packages: Springer Protocols