Abstract
Forensic mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) analysis is a complementary technique to forensic nuclear DNA (nDNA) and trace evidence analysis. Its use has been accepted by the vast majority of courts of law around the world. However for the forensic community it is crucial to employ standardized methods and procedures to guaranty the quality of the results obtained in court. In this chapter, we describe the most important aspects regarding the interpretation and assessment of mtDNA analysis, and offer a simple guide which places particular emphasis on those aspects that can impact the final interpretation of the results. These include the criteria for authenticating a sequence excluding the contaminant origin, defining the quality of a sequence, editing procedure, alignment criteria for searching the databases, and the statistical evaluation of matches. It is not easy to establish a single guide to interpretation for mtDNA analysis; however, it is important to understand all variables that may in some way affect the final conclusion in the context of a forensic case. As a general rule, laboratories should be cautious before issuing the final conclusion of an mtDNA analysis, and consider any significant limitations regarding current understanding of specific aspects of the mtDNA molecule.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Carracedo A, Bär W, Lincoln P et al (2000) DNA Commission of the International Society for Forensic Genetics: guidelines for mitochondrial DNA typing. Forensic Sci Int 110:79–85.
Tully G, Bär W, Brinkmann B et al (2001) Considerations by the European DNA profiling (EDNAP) group on the working practices, nomenclature and interpretation of mitochondrial DNA profiles. Forensic Sci Int 124:83–91.
Scientific Working Group on DNA Analysis Methods (SWGDAM) (2003) Guidelines for mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) nucleotide sequence interpretation. Forensic Sci Commun 5 (2). http://www.fbi.gov/hq/lab/fsc/backissu/april2003/swgdammitodna.htm.
Wilson MR, DiZinno JA, Polanskey D et al (1995a) Validation of mitochondrial DNA sequencing for forensic casework analysis. Int J Legal Med 108:68–74.
Wilson MR, Polanskey D, Butler J. et al (1995b) Extraction, PCR amplification, and sequencing of mitochondrial DNA from human hair shafts. Biotechniques 18:662–669.
Stewart JE, Aagaard PJ, Pokorak EG et al (2003) Evaluation of a multicapillary electrophoresis instrument for mitochondrial DNA typing. J Forensic Sci 48:571–80.
Automated DNA Sequencing Chemistry Guide. Applied Biosystems. https://products.appliedbiosystems.com.
Andrews RM, Kubacka I, Chinnery PF et al (1999) Reanalysis and revision of the Cambridge reference sequence for human mitochondrial DNA. Nat Genet 23:147.
Balding D, Nichols R (1994) DNA profile match probability calculation: how to allow for population stratification, relatedness, database selection and single bands. Forensic Sci Int 64: 125–140.
Holland M, Parsons T (1999) Mitochondrial DNA sequence analysis-validation and use for forensic casework. Forensic Sci Rev 11:21–50.
Tully LA, Parsons TJ, Steighner RJ et al (2000) A sensitive denaturing gradient-gel electrophoresis assay reveals a high frequency of heteroplasmy in hypervariable region I of the human mtDNA control region. Am J Hum Genet 67: 432–443.
Bandelt H-J, Quintana-Murci L, Salas A et al (2002) The fingerprint of phantom mutations in mtDNA data. Am J Hum Genet 71: 1150–1160.
Bandelt H–J, Lahermo P, Richards M et al (2001) Detecting errors in mtDNA data by phylogenetic analysis. Int J Legal Med 115: 64–69.
Bandelt H-J, Salas A, Lutz-Bonengel S (2004) Artificial recombination in forensic mtDNA population databases. Int J Legal Med 118: 267–273
Bandelt H-J, Kivisild T, Parik J et al (2006) Lab-Specific Mutation Processes. In: Bandelt H-J, Macaulay V, Richards M, editors. Human mitochondrial DNA and the evolution of Homo sapiens. Springer-Verlag, Berlin-Heidelberg. pp. 117–146.
Lee HY, Song I, Ha E et al (2008) mtDNAmanager: a Web-based tool for the management and quality analysis of mitochondrial DNA control-region sequences. BMC Bioinformatics 9:473.
Kloss-Brandstätter A, Pacher D, Schönherr S et al (2011) HaploGrep: a fast and reliable algorithm for automatic classification of mitochondrial DNA haplogroups. Hum Mutat 32: 25–32.
Van Oven M, Kayser M (2009) Updated comprehensive phylogenetic tree of global human mitochondrial DNA variation. Hum Mutat 30:E386–E394.
Calloway CD, Reynolds RL, Herrin GL et al (2000) The frequency of heteroplasmy in the HVII region of mtDNA differs across tissue types and increases with age. Am J Hum Genet 66:1384–1397.
Mark Stoneking (2000) Hypervariable sites in the mtDNA control region are mutational hotspots. Am J Hum Genet 67:1029–1032.
Brandstätter A, Parson W (2003) Mitochondrial DNA heteroplasmy or artefacts – a matter of the amplification strategy? Int J Legal Med 117:180–184.
Bendall KE, Macaulay VA, Baker JR, Sykes BC (1996) Heteroplasmic point mutations in the human mtDNA control region. Am J Hum Genet 59:1276–1287.
Sullivan KM, Alliston-Greiner R, Archampong FIA et al (1997) A single difference in mtDNA control region sequence observed between hair shaft and reference samples from a single donor. Proceedings from the 17th International Symposium on Human Identification. Promega Corporation, Madison, Wis, 126–129.
Wilson MR, Polanskey D, Replogle J et al (1997) A family exhibiting heteroplasmy in the human mitochondrial DNA control region reveals both somatic mosaicism and pronounced segregation of mitotypes. HumGenet 100:167–171.
Linch CA, Whiting DA, Holland MM (2001) Human hair histogenesis for the mitochondrial DNA forensic scientist. J Forensic Sci 46:844–853.
Weißensteiner H, Schönherr S, Specht G et al (2010) eCOMPAGT integrates mtDNA: import, validation and export of mitochondrial DNA profiles for population genetics, tumour dynamics and genotype-phenotype association studies. BMC Bioinformatics 11:122.
Monson KL, Miller KWP, Wilson MR, DiZinno JA, Budowle B (2002) The mtDNA population database: an integrated software and database resource for forensic comparison. Forensic Sci Commu. 4 (2). Available: http://www.fbi.gov/hq/lab/fsc/backissu/april2002/miller1.htm.
Parson W, Dür A (2007) EMPOP-A forensic mtDNA database. Forensic Sci Int Gent 1:88–92. Available on-line http://www.empop.org.
Wilson MR, Allard MW, Monson K et al (2002) Recommendations for consistent treatment of length variants in the human mitochondrial DNA control region. Forensic Sci Int 129:35–42.
Wilson MR, Allard MW, Monson K et al (2002) Further discussion of the consistent treatment of length variants in the human mitochondrial DNA control region. Forensic Sci Commun. 4:1–8.
Bandelt H-J, Parson W (2008) Consistent treatment of length variants in the human mtDNA control region: a reappraisal. Int J Legal Med 122:11–21.
Acknowledgments
The author is very grateful to Miguel Paredes for their valued and enriching comments on this chapter.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this protocol
Cite this protocol
Marquez, M.C. (2012). Interpretation Guidelines of mtDNA Control Region Sequence Electropherograms in Forensic Genetics. In: Alonso, A. (eds) DNA Electrophoresis Protocols for Forensic Genetics. Methods in Molecular Biology, vol 830. Humana Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-61779-461-2_21
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-61779-461-2_21
Published:
Publisher Name: Humana Press
Print ISBN: 978-1-61779-460-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-61779-461-2
eBook Packages: Springer Protocols