Abstract
One amino acid is added to a growing peptide by a ribosome through reading triple nucleotides, i.e., a codon, each time. Twenty species of amino acids are often coded by 61 codons, so one amino acid can be coded by more than one codon and the codons coding the same amino acid are called synonymous. Intriguingly, synonymous codons’ usage is often uneven: some are used more often than their alternatives in a genome. The unevenness of codon usage is termed codon usage bias (CUB). CUB is widespread, and its causes and consequences have been under intensive investigation. To facilitate the studying of CUB, in this chapter we present a protocol of estimating CUB by using the free software Codon Usage Analyzer, and apply it to Brachypodium distachyon as an example. To accomplish this protocol, the readers need some basic command-line skills. Briefly, the protocol comprises four major steps: downloading data and software, setting up computing environment, preparing data, and estimating CUB.
References
Vicario S, Moriyama EN, Powell JR (2007) Codon usage in twelve species of Drosophila. BMC Evol Biol 7:226
Chen SL, Lee W, Hottes AK, Shapiro L, McAdams HH (2004) Codon usage between genomes is constrained by genome-wide mutational processes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101(10):3480–3485
Bulmer M (1991) The selection-mutation-drift theory of synonymous codon usage. Genetics 129(3):897–907
Pop C, Rouskin S, Ingolia NT, Han L, Phizicky EM, Weissman JS, Koller D (2014) Causal signals between codon bias, mRNA structure, and the efficiency of translation and elongation. Mol Syst Biol 10:770
Goodman DB, Church GM, Kosuri S (2013) Causes and effects of N-terminal codon bias in bacterial genes. Science 342(6157):475–479
Bentele K, Saffert P, Rauscher R, Ignatova Z, Bluthgen N (2013) Efficient translation initiation dictates codon usage at gene start. Mol Syst Biol 9:675
Qian W, Yang JR, Pearson NM, Maclean C, Zhang J (2012) Balanced codon usage optimizes eukaryotic translational efficiency. PLoS Genet 8(3):e1002603
Singh ND, Davis JC, Petrov DA (2005) X-linked genes evolve higher codon bias in Drosophila and Caenorhabditis. Genetics 171(1):145–155
Hambuch TM, Parsch J (2005) Patterns of synonymous codon usage in Drosophila melanogaster genes with sex-biased expression. Genetics 170(4):1691–1700
Plotkin JB, Kudla G (2011) Synonymous but not the same: the causes and consequences of codon bias. Nat Rev Genet 12(1):32–42
Eyre-Walker AC (1991) An analysis of codon usage in mammals: selection or mutation bias? J Mol Evol 33(5):442–449
Akashi H (1994) Synonymous codon usage in Drosophila melanogaster: natural selection and translational accuracy. Genetics 136(3):927–935
Zhang Z, Presgraves DC (2016) Drosophila X-linked genes have lower translation rates than autosomal genes. Mol Biol Evol 33(2):413–428
Sharp PM, Li WH (1987) The codon Adaptation Index—a measure of directional synonymous codon usage bias, and its potential applications. Nucleic Acids Res 15(3):1281–1295
dos Reis M, Savva R, Wernisch L (2004) Solving the riddle of codon usage preferences: a test for translational selection. Nucleic Acids Res 32(17):5036–5044
Ikemura T (1981) Correlation between the abundance of Escherichia coli transfer RNAs and the occurrence of the respective codons in its protein genes. J Mol Biol 146(1):1–21
Wright F (1990) The “effective number of codons” used in a gene. Gene 87(1):23–29
Acknowledgement
ZZ is grateful to Dr. Daven C Presgraves for the strong support in ZZ’s research.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer Science+Business Media LLC
About this protocol
Cite this protocol
Zhang, Z., Sablok, G. (2018). Estimate Codon Usage Bias Using Codon Usage Analyzer (CUA). In: Sablok, G., Budak, H., Ralph, P. (eds) Brachypodium Genomics. Methods in Molecular Biology, vol 1667. Humana Press, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-7278-4_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-7278-4_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Humana Press, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-7276-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-7278-4
eBook Packages: Springer Protocols