Abstract
Translating neuroprotective efficacy from animal studies to clinical trials in humans has been fraught with difficulty. This failure might be because animal studies were falsely positive or because clinical trials were falsely negative. Alternatively, animal studies as currently conducted may not model human stroke with sufficient fidelity to be a useful predictor of efficacy in clinical trials.
Here we focus on measures to improve the design, conduct, and reporting of animal studies to maximize both their internal and their external validity. These include, but are not limited to, randomization, allocation concealment, blinded assessment of outcome, sample size calculation, and measures to avoid publication bias. In addition, we give a brief introduction to systematic review and meta-analysis of data from animal experiments.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
O’Collins VE, Macleod MR, Donnan GA, Horky LL, van der Worp BH, Howells DW (2006) 1,026 experimental treatments in acute stroke. Ann Neurol 59(3):467–477
Macleod MR, van der Worp HB, Sena ES, Howells DW, Dirnagl U, Donnan GA (2008) Evidence for the efficacy of NXY-059 in experimental focal cerebral ischaemia is confounded by study quality. Stroke 39(10):2824–2829
van der Worp HB, Sena ES, Donnan GA, Howells DW, Macleod MR (2007) Hypothermia in animal models of acute ischaemic stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Brain 130(Pt 12):3063–3074
Sena ES, van der Worp HB, Bath PM, Howells DW, Macleod MR (2010) Publication bias in reports of animal stroke studies leads to major overstatement of efficacy. PLoS Biol 8(3), e1000344
Tsilidis KK, Panagiotou OA, Sena ES, Aretouli E, Evangelou E, Howells DW, Al-Shahi SR, Macleod MR, Ioannidis JP (2013) Evaluation of excess significance bias in animal studies of neurological diseases. PLoS Biol 11(7), e1001609
Ioannidis JP (2005) Why most published research findings are false. PLoS Med 2(8), e124
Lenth RV, Java applets for power and sample size. Retrieved 31st March 2009, from http://www.stat.uiowa.edu/~rlenth/Power
Sena ES, Jeffreys AL, Cox SF, Sastra SA, Churilov L, Rewell S, Batchelor PE, Vander Worp HB, Macleod MR, Howells DW (2013) The benefit of hypothermia in experimental ischemic stroke is not affected by pethidine. Int J Stroke 8:180–185
Macleod MR, Fisher M, O’Collins V, Sena ES, Dirnagl U, Bath PM, Buchan A, van der Worp HB, Traystman RJ, Minematsu K, Donnan GA, Howells DW (2009) Reprint: good laboratory practice: preventing introduction of bias at the bench. Int J Stroke 4(1):3–5
Kilkenny C, Browne WJ, Cuthill IC, Emerson M, Altman DG (2010) Improving bioscience research reporting: the ARRIVE guidelines for reporting animal research. PLoS Biol 8(6), e1000412
Vesterinen HM, Sena ES, Egan KJ, Hirst TC, Churolov L, Currie GL, Antonic A, Howells DW, Macleod MR (2013) Meta-analysis of data from animal studies: a practical guide. J Neurosci Methods 221C:92–102. doi:10.1016/j.jneumeth.2013.09.010.:92-102
Sena ES, Currie GL, McCann SK, Macleod MR, Howells DW (2014) Systematic reviews and meta-analysis of preclinical studies: why perform them and how to appraise them critically. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 34(5):737–742
Prinz F, Schlange T, Asadullah K (2011) Believe it or not: how much can we rely on published data on potential drug targets? Nat Rev Drug Discov 10(9):712
Llovera G, Hofmann K, Roth S, Salas-Perdomo A, Ferrer-Ferrer M, Perego C, Zanier ER, Mamrak U, Rex A, Party H, Agin V, Fauchon C, Orset C, Haelewyn B, De Simoni MG, Dirnagl U, Grittner U, Planas AM, Plesnila N, Vivien D, Liesz A (2015) Results of a preclinical randomized controlled multicenter trial (pRCT): Anti-CD49d treatment for acute brain ischemia. Sci Transl Med 7(299):299ra121
Macleod MR, Lawson McLean A, Kyriakopoulou A, Serghiou S, de Wilde A, Sherratt N, Hirst T, Hemblade R, Bahor Z, Nunes-Fonseca C, Potluru A, Thomson A, Baginskaite J, Egan K, Vesterinen H, Currie GL, Churilov L, Howells DW, Sena ES (2015) Correction: Risk of bias in reports of in vivo research: a focus for improvement. PLoS Biol 13(11):e1002301
Howells DW, Macleod MR (2013) Evidence-based translational medicine. Stroke 44(5):1466–1471
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this protocol
Cite this protocol
Macleod, M.R., Sena, E. (2016). How to Avoid Bumping into the Translational Roadblock. In: Dirnagl, U. (eds) Rodent Models of Stroke. Neuromethods, vol 120. Humana Press, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-5620-3_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-5620-3_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Humana Press, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-5618-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-5620-3
eBook Packages: Springer Protocols