Skip to main content

Ethics of Modeling of Cerebral Ischemia in Small Animals

  • Protocol
  • First Online:
Rodent Models of Stroke

Part of the book series: Neuromethods ((NM,volume 120))

  • 1049 Accesses

Abstract

Animal models of cerebral ischemia have deepened our insight into the pathophysiology of ischemic brain damage. Success rates in translation to the bedside, however, are low. This fact entails unmet hopes for patients and ineffective deployment of money and time. It also highlights the important ethical issue of the quality of animal experiments in stroke research. Attention to this issue should start with the planning phase. This chapter will help researchers to design studies at a high ethical level and thus provide important arguments for obtaining permission from regulatory authorities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Protocol
USD 49.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Kaste M (2005) Use of animal models has not contributed to development of acute stroke therapies: pro. Stroke 36:2323–2324

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Schnabel J (2008) News feature: standard model. Nature 454:682–685

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Suckling K (2008) Opinion: animal research: too much faith in models clouds judgement. Nature 455:460

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Green S (2008) Opinion: animal research: raise standards to protect patients. Nature 455:460

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Fisher M, Tatlisumak T (2005) Use of animal models has not contributed to development of acute stroke therapies: con. Stroke 36:2324–2325

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Wright KC (1997) Working with laboratory animals: general principles and practical considerations. J Vasc Interv Radiol 8:363–373

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. American Physiological Society (2002) Guiding principles for research involving animals and human beings. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 283:R281–R283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Festing MFW (2003) Principles: the need for better experimental design. Trends Pharmacol Sci 24:341–345

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Russell WMS, Burch RL (1959) The principles of humane experimental technique. Methuen, London

    Google Scholar 

  10. Sandberg K, Umans JG, Georgetown Consensus Conference Work Group (2015) Recommendations concerning the new U.S. National Institutes of Health initiative to balance the sex of cells and animals in preclinical research. FASEB J 29:1646–1652

    Google Scholar 

  11. Cressey D (2015) News in focus: UK funders demand strong statistics for animal studies. Nature 520:271–272

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Sotocinal SG, Sorge RE, Zaloum A, Tuttle AH, Martin LJ, Wieskopf JS, Mapplebeck JC, Wei P, Zhan S, Zhang S, McDougall JJ, King OD, Mogil JS (2011) The rat grimace scale: a partially automated method for quantifying pain in the laboratory rat via facial expressions. Mol Pain 7:55

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Meisel C, Prass K, Braun J, Victorov I, Wolf T, Megow D, Halle E, Volk HD, Dirnagl U, Meisel A (2004) Preventive antibacterial treatment improves the general medical and neurological outcome in a mouse model of stroke. Stroke 35:2–6

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Corbett D, Nurse S (1998) The problem of assessing effective neuroprotection in experimental cerebral ischemia. Prog Neurobiol 54:531–548

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Cenci MA, Whishaw IQ, Schallert T (2002) Animal models of neurological deficits: how relevant is the rat? Nat Rev Neurosci 3:574–579

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Meng X, Fisher M, Shen Q, Sotak CH, Duong TQ (2004) Characterizing the diffusion/perfusion mismatch in a rat stroke model of focal cerebral ischemia. Ann Neurol 55:207–212

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Klohs J, Gräfe M, Graf K, Steinbrink J, Dietrich T, Stibenz D, Bahmani P, Kronenberg G, Harms C, Endres M, Lindauer U, Greger K, Stelzer EHK, Dirnagl U, Wunder A (2008) In vivo imaging of the inflammatory receptor CD40 after cerebral ischemia using a fluorescent antibody. Stroke 39:2845–2852

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Würbel H, Garner JP (2007) Refinement of rodent research through environmental enrichment and systematic randomization. NC3Rs #9:1–9

    Google Scholar 

  19. Nevalainen TC, Dontas I, Forslid A, Howard BR, Klusa V, Käsermann HP, Melloni E, Nebendahl K, Stafleu FR, Vergara P, Verstegen J (2000) FELASA recommendations for the education and training of persons carrying out animal experiments (Category B). FELASA working group on education of persons carrying out animal experiments. Lab Anim 34:229–235

    Google Scholar 

  20. Stroke Therapy Academic Industry Roundtable STAIR (1999) Recommendations for standards regarding preclinical neuroprotective and restorative drug development. Stroke 30:2752–2758

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Fisher M1, Feuerstein G, Howells DW, Hurn PD, Kent TA, Savitz SI, Lo EH, STAIR Group (2009) Update of the stroke therapy academic industry roundtable preclinical recommendations. Stroke 40:2244–2250

    Google Scholar 

  22. Kilkenny C, Browne WJ, Cuthill IC, Emerson M, Altman DG (2010) Improving bioscience research reporting: the ARRIVE guidelines for reporting animal research. PLoS Biol 8:e1000412

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ute Lindauer DVM .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this protocol

Cite this protocol

Lindauer, U. (2016). Ethics of Modeling of Cerebral Ischemia in Small Animals. In: Dirnagl, U. (eds) Rodent Models of Stroke. Neuromethods, vol 120. Humana Press, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-5620-3_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-5620-3_17

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Humana Press, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-5618-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-5620-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Protocols

Publish with us

Policies and ethics