Abstract
This chapter addresses issues particular to the optimal design of fMRI experiments. It describes procedures for isolating the psychological process of interest and gives an overview of block, event-related and participant-response-dependent designs. An additional focus is placed on data analysis with emphasis on optimizing and isolating the neuroimaging signal in activated brain regions. Finally, the chapter addresses a number of practical matters including optimal sample sizes and trial durations that confront all researchers when designing their experiments.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Helmchen C, Mohr C, Erdmann C, Binkofski F, Buchel C (2006) Neural activity related to self- versus externally generated painful stimuli reveals distinct differences in the lateral pain system in a parametric fMRI study. Hum Brain Mapp 27:755–765
Braver TS, Cohen JD, Nystrom LE, Jonides J, Smith EE, Noll DC (1997) A parametric study of prefrontal cortex involvement in human working memory. Neuroimage 5:49–62
Price CJ, Friston KJ (1997) Cognitive conjunction: a new approach to brain activation experiments. Neuroimage 5:261–270
Garavan H, Ross TJ, Murphy K, Roche RA, Stein EA (2002) Dissociable executive functions in the dynamic control of behavior: inhibition, error detection, and correction. Neuroimage 17:1820–1829
Donaldson DI, Petersen SE, Ollinger JM, Buckner RL (2001) Dissociating state and item components of recognition memory using fMRI. Neuroimage 13:129–142
Simões-Franklin C, Hester R, Shpaner M, Foxe JJ, Garavan H (2010) Executive function and error detection: the effect of motivation on cingulate and ventral striatum activity. Hum Brain Mapp 31:458–469
Margulies DS, Kelly AM, Uddin LQ, Biswal BB, Castellanos FX, Milham MP (2007) Mapping the functional connectivity of anterior cingulate cortex. Neuroimage 37:579–588
Weiskopf N, Veit R, Erb M et al (2003) Physiological self-regulation of regional brain activity using real-time functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI): methodology and exemplary data. Neuroimage 19:577–586
Hasson U, Nir Y, Levy I, Fuhrmann G, Malach R (2004) Intersubject synchronization of cortical activity during natural vision. Science 303:1634–1640
Slotnick SD, Yantis S (2005) Common neural substrates for the control and effects of visual attention and perceptual bistability. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res 24:97–108
Hahn B, Ross TJ, Stein EA (2007) Cingulate activation increases dynamically with response speed under stimulus unpredictability. Cereb Cortex 17:1664–1671
Risinger RC, Salmeron BJ, Ross TJ et al (2005) Neural correlates of high and craving during cocaine self-administration using BOLD fMRI. Neuroimage 26:1097–1108
Kampe KK, Frith CD, Frith U (2003) “Hey John”: signals conveying communicative intention toward the self activate brain regions associated with “mentalizing,” regardless of modality. J Neurosci 23:5258–5263
O'Doherty JP, Dayan P, Friston K, Critchley H, Dolan RJ (2003) Temporal difference models and reward-related learning in the human brain. Neuron 38(2):329–337, PMID: 12718865
Murphy K, Garavan H (2004) Artifactual fMRI group and condition differences driven by performance confounds. Neuroimage 21:219–228
Poldrack RA (2000) Imaging brain plasticity: conceptual and methodological issues--a theoretical review. Neuroimage 12:1–13
Kelly AM, Garavan H (2005) Human functional neuroimaging of brain changes associated with practice. Cereb Cortex 15:1089–1102
Ioannidis JP (2005) Why most published research findings are false. PLoS Med 2:e124
Button KS, Ioannidis JP, Mokrysz C, Nosek BA, Flint J, Robinson ES, Munafò MR (2013) MR.Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience. Nat Rev Neurosci 5:365–76. doi:10.1038/nrn3475, Epub 2013 Apr 10. Erratum in: Nat Rev Neurosci. 6, 451
Friston KJ, Holmes AP, Worsley KJ (1999) How many subjects constitute a study? Neuroimage 10:1–5
Desmond JE, Glover GH (2002) Estimating sample size in functional MRI (fMRI) neuroimaging studies: statistical power analyses. J Neurosci Methods 118:115–128
Thirion B, Pinel P, Meriaux S, Roche A, Dehaene S, Poline JB (2007) Analysis of a large fMRI cohort: statistical and methodological issues for group analyses. Neuroimage 35:105–120
Murphy K, Garavan H (2004) An empirical investigation into the number of subjects required for an event-related fMRI study. Neuroimage 22:879–885
Saad ZS, Ropella KM, DeYoe EA, Bandettini PA (2003) The spatial extent of the BOLD response. Neuroimage 19:132–144
Huettel SA, McCarthy G (2001) The effects of single-trial averaging upon the spatial extent of fMRI activation. Neuroreport 12:2411–2416
Murphy K, Garavan H (2005) Deriving the optimal number of events for an event-related fMRI study based on the spatial extent of activation. Neuroimage 27:771–777
Murphy K, Bodurka J, Bandettini PA (2007) How long to scan? The relationship between fMRI temporal signal to noise ratio and necessary scan duration. Neuroimage 34:565–574
Cohen MS (1997) Parametric analysis of fMRI data using linear systems methods. Neuroimage 6:93–103
Friston KJ, Holmes AP, Poline JB et al (1995) Analysis of fMRI time-series revisited. Neuroimage 2:45–53
Worsley KJ, Friston KJ (1995) Analysis of fMRI time-series revisited–again. Neuroimage 2:173–181
Smith S, Jenkinson M, Beckmann C, Miller K, Woolrich M (2007) Meaningful design and contrast estimability in FMRI. Neuroimage 34:127–136
Bandettini PA, Cox RW (2000) Event-related fMRI contrast when using constant interstimulus interval: theory and experiment. Magn Reson Med 43:540–548
Miezin FM, Maccotta L, Ollinger JM, Petersen SE, Buckner RL (2000) Characterizing the hemodynamic response: effects of presentation rate, sampling procedure, and the possibility of ordering brain activity based on relative timing. Neuroimage 11:735–759
Dale AM (1999) Optimal experimental design for event-related fMRI. Hum Brain Mapp 8:109–114
Birn RM, Cox RW, Bandettini PA (2002) Detection versus estimation in event-related fMRI: choosing the optimal stimulus timing. Neuroimage 15:252–264
Liu TT, Frank LR, Wong EC, Buxton RB (2001) Detection power, estimation efficiency, and predictability in event-related fMRI. Neuroimage 13:759–773
Wager TD, Nichols TE (2003) Optimization of experimental design in fMRI: a general framework using a genetic algorithm. Neuroimage 18:293–309
Liu TT (2004) Efficiency, power, and entropy in event-related fMRI with multiple trial types. Part II: design of experiments. Neuroimage 21:401–413
Glover GH, Li TQ, Ress D (2000) Image-based method for retrospective correction of physiological motion effects in fMRI: RETROICOR. Magn Reson Med 44:162–167
Birn RM, Diamond JB, Smith MA, Bandettini PA (2006) Separating respiratory-variation-related fluctuations from neuronal-activity-related fluctuations in fMRI. Neuroimage 31:1536–1548
Birn RM, Murphy K, Handwerker DA, Bandettini PA (2009) fMRI in the presence of task-correlated breathing variations. NeuroImage 47(3):1092–1104
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this protocol
Cite this protocol
Garavan, H., Murphy, K. (2016). Experimental Design. In: Filippi, M. (eds) fMRI Techniques and Protocols. Neuromethods, vol 119. Humana Press, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-5611-1_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-5611-1_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Humana Press, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-5609-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-5611-1
eBook Packages: Springer Protocols