Skip to main content

High-Throughput Cell Toxicity Assays

  • Protocol
  • First Online:
High Throughput Screening

Part of the book series: Methods in Molecular Biology ((MIMB,volume 1439))

Abstract

Understanding compound-driven cell toxicity is vitally important for all drug discovery approaches. With high-throughput screening (HTS) being the key strategy to find hit and lead compounds for drug discovery projects in the pharmaceutical industry [1], an understanding of the cell toxicity profile of hit molecules from HTS activities is fundamentally important. Recently, there has been a resurgence of interest in phenotypic drug discovery and these cell-based assays are now being run in HTS labs on ever increasing numbers of compounds. As the use of cell assays increases the ability to measure toxicity of compounds on a large scale becomes increasingly important to ensure that false hits are not progressed and that compounds do not carry forward a toxic liability that may cause them to fail at later stages of a project. Here we describe methods employed in the AstraZeneca HTS laboratory to carry out very large scale cell toxicity screening.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Protocol
USD 49.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Macarron R et al (2011) Impact of high-throughput screening in biomedical research. Nat Rev Drug Discov 10:188–195

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Mayr LM, Bojanic D (2009) Novel trends in high-throughput screening. Curr Opin Pharmacol 9:580–588

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cook D et al (2014) Lessons learned from the fate of AstraZeneca’s drug pipeline: a five-dimensional framework. Nat Rev Drug Discov 13:419–431

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. O’Brien J et al (2000) Investigation of the Alamar Blue (resazurin) fluorescent dye for the assessment of mammalian cell cytotoxicity. Eur J Biochem 267:5421–5426

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Hamid R et al (2004) Comparison of alamar blue and MTT assays for high through-put screening. Toxicol In Vitro 18(2004):703–710

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Nakayama GR et al (1997) Assessment of the Alamar Blue assay for cellular growth and viability in vitro. J Immunol Methods 204:205–208

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Slater K (2001) Cytotoxicity tests for high-throughput drug discovery. Curr Opin Biotechnol 12:70–74

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Weyermann J et al (2005) A practical note on the use of cytotoxicity assays. Int J Pharm 288:369–376

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Promega Corporation. CellToxâ„¢ Green Cytotoxicity Assay. https://www.promega.com/products/cell-health-and-metabolism/cytotoxicity-assays/real-time-cytotoxicity-assay/celltox-green-cytotoxicity-assay/?activeTab= 0. Accessed 1 July 2015

    Google Scholar 

  10. McDougal M et al (2010) Nucleic acid binding dyes and uses thereof. US Patent 2010/0233710 A1

    Google Scholar 

  11. Korzeniewski C, Callewaert DM (1983) An enzyme-release assay for natural cytotoxicity. J Immunol Methods 64:313–320

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Lobner D (2000) Comparison of the LDH and MTT assays for quantifying cell death: validity for neuronal apoptosis? J Neurosci Methods 96:147–152

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Fotakis G, Timbrell JA (2006) In vitro cytotoxicity assays: comparison of LDH, neutral red, MTT and protein assay in hepatoma cell lines following exposure to cadmium chloride. Toxicol Lett 160:171–177

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Luu YK et al (2012) Profiling of toxicity and identification of distinct apoptosis profiles using a 384-well high-throughput flow cytometry screening platform. J Biomol Screen 17:806–812

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Griffith D et al (2012) Implementation and development of an automated, ultra-high-capacity, acoustic, flexible dispensing platform for assay-ready plate delivery. J Lab Autom 17(5):348–358

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Zhang J-H et al (1999) A simple statistical parameter for use in evaluation and validation of high throughput screening assays. J Biomol Screen 4:67–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Lundholt BK et al (2003) A simple technique for reducing edge effect in cell-based assays. J Biomol Screen 8:566–570

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David Murray .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this protocol

Cite this protocol

Murray, D., McWilliams, L., Wigglesworth, M. (2016). High-Throughput Cell Toxicity Assays. In: Janzen, W. (eds) High Throughput Screening. Methods in Molecular Biology, vol 1439. Humana Press, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-3673-1_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-3673-1_16

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Humana Press, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-3671-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-3673-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Protocols

Publish with us

Policies and ethics