Abstract
This chapter focuses on the application of process modeling to determination of design space for pharmaceutical manufacturing processes. The first two sections define design space and related terms from a regulatory perspective and discuss how these apply in practice during pharmaceutical process development. In Sect. 3, a variety of mathematical techniques that can be used to guide design space development are introduced. An emphasis is placed on the use of feasibility analysis and the relationship between process feasibility and design space. Statistical techniques, including latent variable and Bayesian methods, are also discussed in detail. For methods that have been reported in the literature for pharmaceutical manufacturing applications, an overview of the relevant case studies is provided. If methods have not yet been applied to pharmaceutical processes, potential applications for these techniques are indicated. To illustrate the applicability of these concepts to pharmaceutical manufacturing processes, a brief case study is presented in Sect. 4. A discussion of design space verification and issues related to scale-up is provided in Sect. 5. Finally a brief summary of the concepts presented and their potential role in design space development for pharmaceutical processes is given in Sect. 6.
This chapter is intended to provide readers with an understanding of mathematical techniques that can be used during process development to assist in the determination of process design space. An overview of the problem formulation and solution approaches for each method are presented. More detailed mathematical developments for each technique are available in the references provided. Table 1 provides a list of symbols that are used throughout this chapter, while Table 2 describes acronyms used within this chapter.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
ICH (2005) ICH Q8 pharmaceutical development
McKenzie P, Kiang S, Tom J, Rubin E, Futran M (2006) Can pharmaceutical process development become high tech? AIChE J. 52 (12)
ICH Harmonised Tripartite Guideline: Pharmaceutical Development Q8(R2) Current Step 4 Version (2009) International Conference on Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use
Guidance for Industry (2006) Q8 pharmaceutical development, USA
Yu LX (2008) Pharmaceutical quality by design: product and process development, understanding, and control. Pharm Res 25(4):781–791. doi:10.1007/s11095-007-9511-1
ICH (2005) ICH Q9 quality risk management
ICH (2005) ICH Q10 pharmaceutical quality systems
Chatterjee S (2008) Overview of models used in design space determination: a regulatory perspective. Paper presented at the AIChE annual meeting, Philadelphia, PA
Chatterjee S (2012) Design space considerations. In: AAPS annual meeting, Chicago, Il
Degerman M, Westerberg K, Nilsson B (2009) A model-based approach to determine the design space of preparative chromatography. Chem Eng Technol 32(8):1195–1202. doi:10.1002/ceat.200900102
Leopore J, Spavins J (2008) PQLI design space. J Pharm Innov 3(2):79–87
Peterson JJ (2008) A Bayesian approach to the ICH Q8 definition of design space. J Biopharm Stat 18(5):959–975. doi:10.1080/10543400802278197
Guidance for Industry (1995) Immediate release solid oral dosage forms scale-up and postapproval changes: chemistry, manufacturing, and controls, in vitro dissolution testing, and in vivo bioequivalence documentation, USA
Guidance for Industry (1997) Modified release solid oral dosage forms scale-up and postapproval changes: chemistry, manufacturing, and controls, in vitro dissolution testing, and in vivo bioequivalence documentation, USA
Guidance for Industry (1997) Nonsterile semisolid dosage forms scale-up and postapproval changes: chemistry, manufacturing, and controls, in vitro dissolution testing, and in vivo bioequivalence documentation, USA
Guidance for Industry (2004) Changes to an approved NDA or ANDA, USA
Charoo NA, Shamsher AA, Zidan AS, Rahman Z (2012) Quality by design approach for formulation development: a case study of dispersible tablets. Int J Pharm 423(2):167–178. doi:10.1016/j.ijpharm.2011.12.024
Kenett R, Kenett D (2008) Quality by design applications in biosimilar pharmaceutical products. Accredit Qual Assur 13(12):681–690. doi:10.1007/s00769-008-0459-6
Lionberger RA, Lee SL, Lee L, Raw A, Yu LX (2008) Quality by design: concepts for ANDAs. AAPS J 10(2):268–276. doi:10.1208/s12248-008-9026-7
Airaksinen S, Karjalainen M, Shevchenko A, Westermarck S, Leppanen E, Rantanen J, Yliruusi J (2005) Role of water in the physical stability of solid dosage formulations. J Pharm Sci 94(10):2147–2165. doi:10.1002/jps.20411
Wu H, White M, Khan MA (2011) Quality-by-Design (QbD): an integrated process analytical technology (PAT) approach for a dynamic pharmaceutical co-precipitation process characterization and process design space development. Int J Pharm 405(1-2):63–78. doi:10.1016/j.ijpharm.2010.11.045
am Ende D, Bronk KS, Mustakis J, O’Connor G, Santa Maria CL, Nosal R, Watson TNJ (2007) API quality by design example from the torcetrapib manufacturing process. J Pharm Innov 2:71–86
Cimarosti Z, Bravo F, Castoldi D, Tinazzi F, Provera S, Perboni A, Papini D, Westerduin P (2010) Application of the QbD principles in the development of the casopitant mesylate manufacturing process. Process research studies for the definition of the control strategy of some drug substance-CQAs for stages 2a, 2b, and 2c. Org Process Res Dev 14(4):805–814. doi:10.1021/Op1000622
Dach R, Song JHJ, Roschangar F, Samstag W, Senanayake CH (2012) The eight criteria defining a good chemical manufacturing process. Org Process Res Dev 16(11):1697–1706. doi:10.1021/Op300144g
Adeyeye MC (2008) Drug-excipient interaction occurrences during solid dosage form development. Drugs Pharm Sci 178:357–436
Campisi B, Chicco D, Vojnovic D, Phan-Tan-Luu R (1998) Experimental design for a pharmaceutical formulation: optimisation and robustness. J Pharm Biomed Anal 18(1-2):57–65
Muzzio FJ, Alexander A, Goodridge C, Shen E, Shinbrot T (2004) Solids Mixing. In: Paul EL, Atiemo-Obeng VA, Kresta SM (eds) Handbook of Industrial mixing: science and practice. Wiley, Hoboken, NJ, pp 887–985
Faldu B, Sharma A, Sharma A, Chauhan CS (2012) Roller compaction: imperative process for tablet manufacturing: a review. Int J Pharm Res Dev 4(10):40–47
Lee KT, Ingram A, Rowson NA (2013) Comparison of granule properties produced using twin screw extruder and high shear mixer: a step towards understanding the mechanism of twin screw wet granulation. Powder Technol 238:91–98
Rogers AJ, Hashemi A, Ierapetritou MG (2013) Modeling of particulate processes for the continuous manufacture of solid-based pharmaceutical dosage forms. Processes 1(2):67–127
Ng KM (2002) Design and development of solids processes – a process systems engineering perspective. Powder Technol 126(3):205–210
Strong J (2009) Scale-up of pharmaceutical manufacturing operations of solid dosage forms. In: Qiu Y, Chen Y, Zhang GZ, Liu L, Porter WR (eds) Developing solid oral dosage forms: pharmaceutical theory and practice. Academic Press, New York, NY, USA, pp 615–636. doi:10.1016/B978-0-444-53242-8.00027-8, An Imprint of Elsevier
Järvinen MA, Paaso J, Paavola M, Leivisk K, Juuti M, Muzzio F, Järvinen K (2013) Continuous direct tablet compression: effects of impeller rotation rate, total feed rate and drug content on the tablet properties and drug release. Drug Dev Ind Pharm 39(11):1802–1808
Boukouvala F, Niotis V, Ramachandran R, Muzzio FJ, Ierapetritou MG (2012) An integrated approach for dynamic flowsheet modeling and sensitivity analysis of a continuous tablet manufacturing process. Comput Chem Eng 42:30–47. doi:10.1016/j.compchemeng.2012.02.015
Gentis ND, Betz G (2012) Compressibility of binary powder formulations: investigation and evaluation with compaction equations. J Pharm Sci 101(2):777–793. doi:10.1002/jps.22794
Faure A, York P, Rowe RC (2001) Process control and scale-up of pharmaceutical wet granulation processes: a review. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 52:269–277
Vervaet C, Remon JP (2005) Continuous granulation in the pharmaceutical industry. Chem Eng Sci 60:3949–3957
Iveson SM, Litster JD, Hapgood K, Ennis BJ (2001) Nucleation, growth and breakage phenomena in agitated wet granulation processes: a review. Powder Technol 117:3–39
Kleinebudde P (2004) Roll compaction/dry granulation: pharmaceutical applications. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 58:317–326
Lecompte T, Doremus P, Thomas G, Perier-Camby L (2005) Dry granulation of organic powders – dependence of pressure 2D-distribution on different process parameters. Chem Eng Sci 60:3933–3940
Hlinak AJ, Kuriyan K, Morris KR, Reklaitis GV, Basu PK (2006) Understanding critical material properties for solid dosage form design. J Pharm Innov 1(1):12–17
Jornitz MW (2008) Vendor qualification and validation. In: Agalloco J, Carleton FJ (eds) Validation of pharmaceutical processes, 3rd edn. Informa Healthcare, New York, NY, USA, p 529
Zhang X, Lionberger RA, Davit BM, Yu LX (2011) Utility of physiologically based absorption modeling in implementing quality by design in drug development. AAPS J 13(1):59–71. doi:10.1208/s12248-010-9250-9
Jivraj M, Martini LG, Thomson CM (2000) An overview of the different excipients useful for the direct compression of tablets. Pharm Sci Technol Today 3(2):58–63
Pifferi G, Santoro P, Pedrani M (1999) Quality and functionality of excipients. Farmaco 54(1–2):1–14
Morin G, Briens L (2013) The effect of lubricants on powder flowability for pharmaceutical application. AAPS PharmSciTech 14(3):1158–1168
Wang J, Wen H, Desai D (2010) Lubrication in tablet formulations. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 75(1):1–15. doi:10.1016/j.ejpb.2010.01.007
Onuki Y, Kawai S, Arai H, Maeda J, Takagaki K, Takayama K (2012) Contribution of the physicochemical properties of active pharmaceutical ingredients to tablet properties identified by ensemble artificial neural networks and Kohonen’s self-organizing maps. J Pharm Sci 101(7):2372–2381. doi:10.1002/jps.23134
Herting MG, Kleinebudde P (2007) Roll compaction/dry granulation: effect of raw material particle size on granule and tablet properties. Int J Pharm 338(1-2):110–118. doi:10.1016/j.ijpharm.2007.01.035
Kushner J, Langdon BA, Hiller JI, Carlson GT (2011) Examining the impact of excipient material property variation on drug product quality attributes: a quality-by-design study for a roller compacted, immediate release tablet. J Pharm Sci 100(6):2222–2239. doi:10.1002/jps.22455
Nosal R, Schultz T (2008) PQLI definition of criticality. J Pharm Innov 3(2):69–78
Garcia T, Cook G, Nozal R (2008) PQLI key topics: criticality, design space, and control strategy. J Pharm Innov 3(2):60–68
Saltelli A, Chan K, Scott EM (2000) Sensivivity analysis. Wiley, Chichester
Saltelli A, Annoni P, Azzini I, Campolongo F, Ratto M, Tarantola S (2010) Variance based sensitivity analysis of model output. Design and estimator for the total sensitivity index. Comput Phys Commun 181(2):259–270. doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2009.09.018
Rogers AJ, Inamdar C, Ierapetritou MG (2013) An integrated approach to simulation of pharmaceutical processes for solid drug manufacture. Ind Eng Chem Res 131015102838009. doi: 10.1021/ie401344a
Kikuchi S, Takayama K (2009) Reliability assessment for the optimal formulations of pharmaceutical products predicted by a nonlinear response surface method. Int J Pharm 374(1-2):5–11. doi:10.1016/j.ijpharm.2009.02.016
Grossmann IE, Calfa B, Garcia-Herreros P (2014) Evolution of concepts and models for quantifying resiliency and flexibility of chemical processes. Comput Chem Eng. doi:10.1016/j.compchemeng.2013.12.013
Lima FV, Jia Z, Lerapetritou M, Georgakis C (2010) Similarities and differences between the concepts of operability and flexibility: the steady-state case. AIChE J 56(3):702–716. doi:10.1002/Aic.12021
Boukouvala F, Muzzio FJ, Ierapetritou MG (2010) Design space of pharmaceutical processes using data-driven-based methods. J Pharm Innov 5(3):119–137. doi:10.1007/s12247-010-9086-y
Morari M (1983) Flexibility and resiliency of process systems. Comput Chem Eng 7(4):423–437
Swaney RE, Grossmann IE (1985) An index for operational flexibility in chemical process design. Part II: computational algorithms. AIChE J 31(4):631–641
Swaney RE, Grossmann IE (1985) An index for operational flexibility in chemical process design. Part II: computational algorithms. AIChE J 31(4):631–641
Boukouvala F, Ierapetritou MG (2012) Feasibility analysis of black-box processes using an adaptive sampling Kriging-based method. Comput Chem Eng 36:358–368. doi:10.1016/j.compchemeng.2011.06.005
Grossmann IE, Floudas CA (1987) Active constraint strategy for flexibility analysis in chemical processes. Comput Chem Eng 11(6):675–693
Biegler LT, Grossmann IE, Westerberg AW (1997) Systematic methods of chemical process design. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ
Halemane KP, Grossmann IE (1983) Optimal process design under uncertainty. AIChE J 49:425
Kuhn HW, Tucker AW (1950) Nonlinear programming. In: Proceedings of the second Berkeley symposium on mathematical statistics and probability. University of California Press, Berkeley, CA, pp 481–492
Ostrovsky GM, Volin YM, Barit EI, Senyavin MM (1994) Flexibility analysis and optimization of chemical plants with uncertain parameters. Comput Chem Eng 18:755–767
Ostrovsky GM, Achenie LEK, Wang Y, Volin YM (2002) A unique approach for solving sub-problems in flexibility analysis. Chem Eng Comm 189(1):125–149
Ostrovsky GM, Achenie LEK, Wang Y (2000) A new algorithm for computing process flexibility. Ind Eng Chem Res 39:2368–2377
Floudas CA, Gümüs ZH, Ierapetritou MG (2001) Global optimization in design under uncertainty: feasibility test and flexibility index problems. Ind Eng Chem Res 40:4267–4282
Floudas CA (2000) Nonconvex optimization and its applications. In: Floudas CA (ed) Deterministic global optimization: theory, methods and applications, vol 37. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands
Subrahmanyam S, Peknyt JF, Reklaitis GV (1994) Design of batch chemical-plants under market uncertainty. Ind Eng Chem Res 33(11):2688–2701. doi:10.1021/Ie00035a019
Vin JP, Ierapetritou MG (2001) Robust short-term scheduling for multiproduct batch plants under demand uncertainty. Ind Eng Chem Res 40:4543–4554
Linninger AA, Chakraborty A (2001) Pharmaceutical waste management under uncertainty. Comput Chem Eng 25(4–6):675–681. doi:10.1016/S0098-1354(01)00668-8
Pistikopoulos EN, Mazzuchi TA (1990) A novel flexibility analysis approach for processes with stochastic parameters. Comput Chem Eng 14(9):991–1000
Straub DA, Grossmann IE (1990) Integrated stochastic metric of flexibility for systems with discrete state and continuous parameter uncertainties. Comput Chem Eng 14(9):967–985
Straub DA, Grossmann IE (1993) Design optimization of stochastic flexibility. Comput Chem Eng 17(4):339–354
Grossmann IE, Straub DA (1996) Recent developments in the evaluation and optimization of flexible chemical processes. In: Reklaitis GV, Sunol AK, Rippin DWT, Hortacsu O (eds) Batch processing systems engineering fundamentals and applications for chemical engineering, vol 143, Fundamentals and applications for chemical engineering. Springer in Collaboration with NATO Scientific Affairs Division, Heidelberg, Berlin, pp 495–516
Bansal V, Perkins JD, Pistikopoulos EN (2000) Flexibility analysis and design of linear systems by parametric programming. AIChE J 46(2):335–354. doi:10.1002/aic.690460212
Bansal V, Perkins JD, Pistikopoulos EN (2002) Flexibility analysis and design using a parametric programming framework. AIChE J 48(12):2851–2868
Pistikopoulos EN, Ierapetritou MG (1995) Novel-approach for optimal process design under uncertainty. Comput Chem Eng 19(10):1089–1110. doi:10.1016/0098-1354(94)00093-4
Bansal V, Perkins JD, Pistikopoulos EN (1998) Flexibility analysis and design of dynamic processes with stochastic parameters. Comput Chem Eng 22(Suppl):S817–S820. doi:10.1016/S0098-1354(98)00156-2
Boukouvala F, Ierapetritou M (2012) Simulation-based derivative-free optimization for computationally expensive function. In: AIChE annual meeting, Pittsburgh, PA
Myers RH, Montgomery DC (2002) Response surface methodology process and product optimization using designed experiments. Wiley, New York
Box GEP, Wilson KB (1951) On the experimental attainment of optimum conditions. J Roy Stat Soc B 13(1):1–35
Jia ZY, Davis E, Muzzio FJ, Ierapetritou MG (2009) Predictive modeling for pharmaceutical processes using Kriging and response surface. J Pharm Innov 4(4):174–186. doi:10.1007/s12247-009-9070-6
Calder CA, Cressie N (2009) Kriging and variogram models. In: Kitchin R, Thrift N (eds) International encyclopedia of human geography, vol 1. Elsevier, Oxford, pp 49–55
Kleijnen JPC (2009) Kriging metamodeling in simulation: a review. Eur J Oper Res 192(3):707–716. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2007.10.013
Metheron G (1963) Principles of geostatistics. Econ Geol 58(8)
Agatonovic-Kustrin S, Beresford R (2000) Basic concepts of artificial neural network (ANN) modeling and its application in pharmaceutical research. J Pharm Biomed Anal 22(5):717–727
Basheer IA, Hajmeer M (2000) Artificial neural networks: fundamentals, computing, design, and application. J Microbiol Methods 43(1):3–31
Li G, Rosenthal C, Rabitz H (2001) High dimensional model representations. J Phys Chem A 105(33)
Li GY, Wang SW, Rabitz H (2002) Practical approaches to construct RS-HDMR component functions. J Phys Chem A 106(37):8721–8733. doi:10.1021/Jp014567t
Li G, Rabitz H, Hu J, Chen Z, Ju Y (2008) Regularized random-sampling high dimensional model representation (RS-HDMR). J Math Chem 43(3):1207–1232
Boukouvala F, Muzzio FJ, Ierapetritou MG (2011) Dynamic data-driven modeling of pharmaceutical processes. Ind Eng Chem Res 50(11):6743–6754. doi:10.1021/Ie102305a
Jia Z, Davis E, Muzzio FJ, Ierapetritou MG (2009) Predictive modeling for pharmaceutical processes using Kriging and response surface. J Pharm Innov
Boukouvala F, Ierapetritou MG (2014) Derivative-free optimization for expensive constrained problems using a novel expected improvement objective function. AIChE J 60(7):2462–2474
Johanson JR (1965) A rolling theory for granular solids. ASME J Appl Mech E32(4):842–848
Samsatli NJ, Papageorgiou LG, Shah N (1999) Batch process design and operating using operational envelopes. Comput Chem Eng Suppl 5887–5890
Ierapetritou MG (2001) A new approach for quantifying process feasibility: convex and one dimensional quasi-convex regions. AIChE J 47(6):1407–1417
Goyal V, Ierapetritou MG (2002) Determination of operability limits using simplicial approximation. AIChE J 48(12):2902–2909
Director SW, Hachtel GD (1977) The simplicial approximation approach to design centering. IEEE Trans Circ Syst 24(7)
Banarjee I, Ierapetritou MG (2005) Feasibility evaluation of nonconvex systems using shape reconstruction techniques. Ind Eng Chem Res 44:3638–3647
Wold S, Sjostrom M, Eriksson L (2001) PLS-regression: a basic tool of chemometrics. Chemometr Intell Lab 58(2):109–130. doi:10.1016/S0169-7439(01)00155-1
López-Negrete de la Fuente R, GarcÃa-Muñoz S, Biegler LT (2010) An efficient nonlinear programming strategy for PCA models with incomplete data sets. J Chemometr 24(6):301–311
Burnham AJ, MacGregor JF, Viveros R (1999) Latent variable multivariate regression modeling. Chemometr Intell Lab 48(2):167–180. doi:10.1016/S0169-7439(99)00018-0
Hoskuldsson A (1988) PLS regression methods. J Chemometr 2:211
GarcÃa-Muñoz S, Polizzi M (2012) WSPLS – a new approach towards mixture modeling and accelerated product development. Chemometr Intell Lab 15:116–121
GarcÃa-Muñoz S, MacGregor JF, Kourti T (2005) Product transfer between sites using Joint-Y PLS. Chemometr Intell Lab 79:101–114
Huang J, Kaul G, Cai C, Chatlapalli R, Hernandez-Abad P, Gosh K, Nagi A (2009) Quality by design case study: an integrated multivariate approach to drug product and process development. Int J Pharm 382:23–32
MacGregor JF, Bruwer M-J (2008) A framework for the development of design and control spaces. J Pharm Innov 3:15–22
GarcÃa-Muñoz S, Dolph S, Ward HWI (2010) Handling uncertainty in the establishment of a design space for the manufacture of a pharmaceutical product. Comput Chem Eng 34:1098–1107
GarcÃa-Muñoz S (2009) Establishing multivariate specifications for incoming materials using data from multiple scales. Chemometr Intell Lab 98(1):51–57
Duchesne C, Macgregor JF (2004) Establishing multivariate specification regions for incoming materials. J Qual Technol 36(1):78–94
Nasr M (2007) The FDA’s initiative on pharmaceutical quality for the 21-st century: emphasizing quality by design. In: IFPAC, Baltimore, MD
Garcia-Munoz S, MacGregor JF, Kourti T, Apruzzece F, Champagne M (2006) Optimization of batch operating policies. Part I. Handling multiple solutions. Ind Eng Chem Res 45(23):7856–7866
GarcÃa-Muñoz S, MacGregor JF, Neogi D, Latshaw BE, Mehta S (2008) Optimization of batch operating policies. Part II. Incorporating process constraints and industrial applications. Ind Eng Chem Res 47(12):4202–4208
Jaeckle CM, MacGregor JF (1998) Product design through multivariate statistical analysis of process data. AIChE J 44(5):1105–1118. doi:10.1002/aic.690440509
Montgomery DC, Bettencourt VMJ (1977) Multiple response surface methods in computer simulation. Simulation 29:113–121
Park KS, Kim KJ (2005) Optimizing multi-response surface problems: how to use multi-objective optimization techniques. IIE Trans 37(6):523–532. doi:10.1080/07408170590928992
Khuri AI, Conlon M (1981) Simultaneous optimization of multiple responses represented by polynomal regression function. Technometrics 23:363–375
Pignatiello JJ (1993) Strategies for robust multiresponse quality engineering. IIE Trans 25(3):5–15. doi:10.1080/07408179308964286
Vining GG (1998) A compromise approach to multi-response optimization. J Qual Technol 30:309–313
Peterson JJ (2004) A posterior predictive approach to multiple response surface optimization. J Qual Technol 36(2):139–153
Dimitriadis VD, Pistikopoulos EN (1995) Flexibility analysis of dynamic-systems. Ind Eng Chem Res 34(12):4451–4462. doi:10.1021/Ie00039a036
Holt BR, Morari M (1985) Design of resilient processing plants V – the effect of deadtime on dynamic resilience. Chem Eng Sci 40:1229
Holt BR, Morari M (1985) Design of resilient processing plants VI – the effect of right half plane zeros on dynamic resilience. Chem Eng Sci 40:59
Skogestad S, Morari M (1987) Design of resilient processing plants IX – the effect of model uncertainty on dynamic resilience. Chem Eng Sci 42:1765
Soroush M, Kravaris C (1993) Optimal-design and operation of batch reactors. 1. Theoretical framework. Ind Eng Chem Res 32(5):866–881. doi:10.1021/Ie00017a015
Soroush M, Kravaris C (1993) Optimal-design and operation of batch reactors. 2. A case-study. Ind Eng Chem Res 32(5):882–893. doi:10.1021/Ie00017a016
Vassiliadis VS, Sargent RWH, Pantelides CC (1994) Solution of a class of multistage dynamic optimization problems. 1. Problems without path constraints. Ind Eng Chem Res 33(9):2111–2122. doi:10.1021/Ie00033a014
Vassiliadis VS, Sargent RWH, Pantelides CC (1994) Solution of a class of multistage dynamic optimization problems. 2. Problems with path constraints. Ind Eng Chem Res 33(9):2123–2133. doi:10.1021/Ie00033a015
Biegler LT (2007) An overview of simultaneous strategies for dynamic optimization. Chem Eng Process 46(11):1043–1053. doi:10.1016/j.cep.2006.06.021
Biegler LT, Cervantes AM, Wächter A (2002) Advances in simultaneous strategies for dynamic process optimization. Chem Eng Sci 57(4):575–593, Doi: Pii S0009-2509(01)00376-1
Kameswaran S, Biegler LT (2006) Simultaneous dynamic optimization strategies: recent advances and challenges. Comput Chem Eng 30:1560–1575
Betts JT (2001) Practical methods for optimal control using nonlinear programming. Advances in design and control. SIAM, Philadelphia, PA
Bahri PA, Bandoni JA, Romagnoli JA (1997) Integrated flexibility and controllability analysis in design of chemical processes. AIChE J 43(4):997–1015. doi:10.1002/aic.690430415
Mohideen MJ, Perkins JD, Pistikopoulos EN (1996) Optimal design of dynamic systems under uncertainty. AIChE J 42(8):2251–2272
Engisch WE, Muzzio FJ (2012) Method for characterization of loss-in-weight feeder equipment. Powder Technol 228:395–403. doi:10.1016/j.powtec.2012.05.058
Zhou H, Li X, Qian Y, Kraslawski A (2009) Optimizing the initial conditions to improve the dynamic flexibility of batch processes. Ind Eng Chem Res 48:6321–6326
Luus R, Hennessy D (1999) Optimization of fed-batch reactors by the Luus-Jaakola optimization procedures. Ind Eng Chem Res 38:1948–1955
Huang W, Li X, Yang S, Qian Y (2011) Dynamic flexibility analysis of chemical reaction systems with time delay: Using a modified finite element collocation method. Chem Eng Res Des 89:1938–1946
Uchida K, Shimemura E, Kubo T, Abe M (1988) The linear-quadratic optimal control approach to feedback control design for systems with delay. Automatica 24:773–780
Kim AV, Han SH, Kwon WH, Pimenov VG (1998) Explicit numerical methods and LQR control algorithms for time-delay systems. In: International conference on electrical engineering, Korea, pp 21–25
Bindhumadhavan G, Seville JPK, Adams MJ, Greenwood RW, Fitzpatrick S (2005) Roll compaction of a pharmaceutical excipient: experimental validation of rolling theory for granular solids. Chem Eng Sci 60:3891–3897
Reynolds G, Ingale R, Roberts R, Kothari S, Gururagan B (2010) Practical application of roller compaction process modeling. Comput Chem Eng 34:1049–1057
Hsu SH, Reklaitis GV, Venkatasubramanian V (2010) Modeling and control of roller compaction for pharmaceutical manufacturing. Part I: process dynamics and control framework. J Pharm Innov 5:14–23
Garcia T, McCurdy V, Watson TNJ, Ende MA, Butterell P, Vukovinsky K, Chueh A, Coffman J, Cooper S, Schuemmelfeder B (2012) Verification of design spaces developed at subscale. J Pharm Innov 7(1):13–18. doi:10.1007/s12247-012-9123-0
Plumb K (2005) Continuous processing in the pharmaceutical industry – changing the mind set. Chem Eng Res Des 83(A6):730–738. doi:10.1205/Cherd.04359
Brone D, Alexander A, Muzzio FJ (1998) Quantitative characterization of mixing of dry powders in V-blenders. AIChE J 44(2):217–278
Ahmend SU, Katdare A, Naini V, Wadgaonkar D (2014) Scale-up, technology transfer, and process performance qualification. In: Shargel L, Kanfer I (eds) Generic drug product development: solid oral dosage forms, vol 129, 2nd edn, Drugs and the pharmaceutical sciences. CRC Press Taylor & Francis Group, Boca Raton, FL
Hallow DM, Mudryk BM, Braem AD, Tabora JE, Lyngberg OK, Bergum JS, Rossano LT, Tummala S (2010) An example of utilizing mechanistic and empirical modeling in quality by design. J Pharm Innov 5(4):193–203. doi:10.1007/s12247-010-9094-y
Burt JL, Braem AD, Ramirez A, Mudryk B, Rossano L, Tummala S (2011) Model-guided design space development for a drug substance manufacturing process. J Pharm Innov 6(3):181–192. doi:10.1007/s12247-011-9109-3
Shah N (2004) Pharmaceutical supply chains: key issues and strategies for optimisation. Comput Chem Eng 28(6-7):929–941. doi:10.1016/j.compchemeng.2003.09.022
Gao Y, Muzzio FJ, Ierapetritou MG (2011) Characterization of feeder effects on continuous solid mixing using Fourier series analysis. AIChE J 57(5):1144–1153
Yang S, Evans JRG (2007) Metering and dispensing of powder; the quest for new solid freeforming techniques. Powder Technol 178:56–72
Nakach M, Authelin J-R, Chamayou A, Dodds J (2004) Comparison of various milling technologies for grinding pharmaceutical powders. Int J Miner Process 74S:S173–S181
Reynolds GK (2010) Modelling of pharmaceutical granule size reduction in a conical screen mill. Chem Eng J 164:383–392
Verheezen JJAM, van der Voort Maarschalk K, Faassen F, Vromans H (2004) Milling of agglomerates in an impact mill. Int J Pharm 278:165–172
Vendola TA, Hancock BC (2008) The effect of mill type on two dry-granulated placebo formulations. Pharm Technol. 32(11)
Pernenkil L, Cooney CL (2006) A review on the continuous blending of powders. Chem Eng Sci 61(2):720–742. doi:10.1016/j.ces.2005.06.016
Portillo PM, Ierapetritou MG, Muzzio FJ (2008) Characterization of continuous convective powder mixing processes. Powder Technol 182(3):368–378. doi:10.1016/j.powtec.2007.06.024
Marikh K, Berthiaux H, Gatumel C, Mizonov V, Barantseva E (2008) Influence of stirrer type on mixture homogeneity in continuous powder mixing: a model case and a pharmaceutical case. Chem Eng Res Des 86(9A):1027–1037. doi:10.1016/j.cherd.2008.04.001
Vanarase AU, Muzzio FJ (2011) Effect of operating conditions and design parameters in a continuous powder mixer. Powder Technol 208(1):26–36. doi:10.1016/j.powtec.2010.11.038
Dhenge RM, Cartwright JJ, Hounslow MJ, Salman AD (2012) Twin screw wet granulation: effects of properties of granulation liquid. Powder Technol 229:126–136
Betz G, Junker-Burgin P, Leuenberger H (2003) Batch and continuous processing in the production of pharmaceutical granules. Pharmaceut Dev Tech 8(3):289–297
Vercruysse J, Córdoba DÃaz D, Peeters E, Fonteyne M, Delaet U, Van Assche I, De Beer T (2012) Continuous twin screw granulation: influence of process variables on granule and tablet quality. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 82:205–211
Yu S, Gururajan B, Reynolds G, Roberts R, Adams MJ, Wu CY (2012) A comparative study of roll compaction of free-flowing and cohesive pharmaceutical powders. Int J Pharm 428:39–47
Kudra T, Mujumdar AS (2009) Advanced drying technologies, 2nd edn. Taylor & Francis Group, Boca Raton, FL
Paltzer S (2007) Drying of wet agglomerates in a continuous fluid bed: influence of residence time, air temperature and air-flowrate on the drying kinetics and the amount of oversize particles. Chem Eng Sci 62:463
Mortier ST, De Beer T, Gernaey KV, Vercruysse J, Fonteyne M, Remon JP, Vervaet C, Nopens I (2012) Mechanistic modelling of the drying behaviour of single pharmaceutical granules. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 80(3):682–689. doi:10.1016/j.ejpb.2011.12.010
Hovmand S (1995) Fluidized bed drying. In: Mujumdar AS (ed) Handbook of industrial drying, 2nd edn. Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York, NY
Carstensen JT, Zoglio MA (1982) Tray drying of pharmaceutical wet granulations. J Pharm Sci 71(1):35–39
McLoughlin CM, McMinn WAM, Magee TRA (2003) Microwave-vacuum drying of pharmaceutical powders. Dry Technol 21(9):1719–1733. doi:10.1081/Drt-120025505
Patel S, Kaushal AM, Bansal AK (2007) Effect of particle size and compression force on compaction behavior and derived mathematical parameters of compressibility. Pharm Res 24(1):111–124. doi:10.1007/s11095-006-9129-8
Jackson S, Sinka IC, Cocks AC (2007) The effect of suction during die fill on a rotary tablet press. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 65(2):253–256. doi:10.1016/j.ejpb.2006.10.008
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to acknowledge financial support from Bristol-Myers Squibb as well as from the Engineering Research Center for Structured Organic Particulate Systems at Rutgers University (NSF-0504497, NSF-ECC 0540855).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this protocol
Cite this protocol
Rogers, A., Ierapetritou, M.G. (2016). Mathematical Tools for the Quantitative Definition of a Design Space. In: Ierapetritou, M.G., Ramachandran, R. (eds) Process Simulation and Data Modeling in Solid Oral Drug Development and Manufacture. Methods in Pharmacology and Toxicology. Humana, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-2996-2_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-2996-2_8
Publisher Name: Humana, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-2995-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-2996-2
eBook Packages: Springer Protocols