Skip to main content

PFGE Protocols to Distinguish Subspecies of Lactococcus lactis

  • Protocol
Pulse Field Gel Electrophoresis

Abstract

Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE), developed in the mid-1980s, rapidly became a “gold standard” method for analyzing bacterial chromosomes. Today, although outcompeted in resolution by alternative methods, such as optical mapping, and not applicable for high-throughput analyses, PFGE remains a valuable method for bacterial strain typing. Here, we describe optimized protocols for macrorestriction fingerprinting, characterization of plasmid complements, and gene localization by DNA-DNA hybridization of Lactococcus lactis genomes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Protocol
USD 49.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Le Bourgeois P, Mata M, Ritzenthaler P (1989) Genome comparison of Lactococcus strains by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. FEMS Microbiol Lett 59:65–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Tanskanen EI, Tulloch DL, Hillier AJ, Davidson BE (1990) Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis of SmaI digest of lactococcal genomic DNA, a novel method of strain identification. Appl Environ Microbiol 56:3105–3111

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Tulloch DL, Finch LR, Hillier AJ, Davidson BE (1991) Physical map of the chromosome of Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactis DL11 and localization of six putative rRNA operons. J Bacteriol 173:2768–2775

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Le Bourgeois P, Lautier M, Mata M, Ritzenthaler P (1992) Physical and genetic map of the chromosome of Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactis IL1403. J Bacteriol 174:6752–6762

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Le Bourgeois P, Lautier M, van den Berghe L, Gasson MJ, Ritzenthaler P (1995) Physical and genetic map of the Lactococcus lactis subsp. cremoris MG1363 chromosome: comparison with that of Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactis IL1403 reveals a large genome inversion. J Bacteriol 177:2840–2850

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Rademaker JL, Herbet H, Starrenburg MJ, Naser SM, Gevers D, Kelly WJ, Hugenholtz J, Swings J, van Hylckama Vlieg JET (2007) Diversity analysis of dairy and nondairy Lactococcus lactis isolates, using a novel multilocus sequence analysis scheme and (GTG)5-PCR fingerprinting. Appl Environ Microbiol 73:7128–7137

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Passerini D, Beltramo C, Coddeville M, Quentin Y, Ritzenthaler P, Daveran-Mingot ML, Le Bourgeois P (2010) Genes but not genomes reveal bacterial domestication of Lactococcus lactis. PLoS One 5:e15306

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kutahya OE, Starrenburg MJ, Rademaker JL, Klaassen CH, van Hylckama Vlieg JET, Smid EJ, Kleerebezem M (2011) High-resolution amplified fragment length polymorphism typing of Lactococcus lactis strains enables identification of genetic markers for subspecies-related phenotypes. Appl Environ Microbiol 77:5192–5198

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Cai W, Jing J, Irvin B, Ohler L, Rose E, Shizuya H, Kim UJ, Simon M, Anantharaman T, Mishra B, Schwartz DC (1998) High-resolution restriction maps of bacterial artificial chromosomes constructed by optical mapping. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 95:3390–3395

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kelly WJ, Ward LJ, Leahy SC (2010) Chromosomal diversity in Lactococcus lactis and the origin of dairy starter cultures. Genome Biol Evol 2:729–744

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Campo N, Dias MJ, Daveran-Mingot ML, Ritzenthaler P, Le Bourgeois P (2004) Chromosomal constraints in Gram-positive bacteria revealed by artificial inversions. Mol Microbiol 51:511–522

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Le Bourgeois P, Daveran-Mingot ML, Ritzenthaler P (2000) Genome plasticity among related Lactococcus strains: identification of genetic events associated with macrorestriction polymorphisms. J Bacteriol 182:2481–2491

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Barton BM, Harding GP, Zuccarelli AJ (1995) A general method for detecting and sizing large plasmids. Anal Biochem 226:235–240

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. McClelland M, Patel R, Nelson M (1987) Restriction endonucleases for pulsed-field mapping of bacterial genomes. Nucleic Acids Res 15:5985–6005

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Hightower RC, Metge DW, Santi DV (1987) Plasmid migration using orthogonal-field-alternation gel electrophoresis. Nucleic Acids Res 15:8387–8398

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Beverley SM (1988) Characterization of the ‘unusual’ mobility of large DNAs in pulsed field-gradient electrophoresis. Nucleic Acids Res 16:925–938

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Wang M, Lai E (1995) Pulsed field separation of large supercoiled and open-circular DNAs and its application to bacterial artificial chromosome cloning. Electrophoresis 16:1–7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Mathews MK, Hui CF, Smith CL, Cantor CR (1988) High-resolution separation and accurate size determination in pulsed-field gel electrophoresis of DNA: 4. Influence of DNA topology. Biochemistry 27:9222–9226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Leach TJ, Glaser RL (1998) Quantitative hybridization to genomic DNA fractionated by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. Nucleic Acids Res 26:4787–4789

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Klaenhammer TR, McKay LL, Baldwin KA (1978) Improved lysis of group N streptococci for isolation and rapid characterization of plasmid deoxyribonucleic acid. Appl Environ Microbiol 35:592–600

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, the University Toulouse III–University Paul Sabatier, and the Région Midi-Pyrénées (APRRTT 2010 program).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pascal Le Bourgeois .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this protocol

Cite this protocol

Le Bourgeois, P., Passerini, D., Coddeville, M., Guellerin, M., Daveran-Mingot, ML., Ritzenthaler, P. (2015). PFGE Protocols to Distinguish Subspecies of Lactococcus lactis . In: Jordan, K., Dalmasso, M. (eds) Pulse Field Gel Electrophoresis. Methods in Molecular Biology, vol 1301. Humana Press, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-2599-5_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-2599-5_17

  • Publisher Name: Humana Press, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-2598-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-2599-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Protocols

Publish with us

Policies and ethics