Skip to main content

EPIC-μCT Imaging of Articular Cartilage

  • Protocol
  • First Online:
Osteoporosis and Osteoarthritis

Part of the book series: Methods in Molecular Biology ((MIMB,volume 1226))

Abstract

Characterization of articular cartilage morphology and composition using microcomputed tomography (microCT) techniques requires the use of contrast agents to enhance X-ray attenuation of the tissue. This chapter describes the use of an anionic iodinated contrast agent at equilibrium with articular cartilage. In this technique, negatively charged contrast agent molecules distribute themselves inversely with respect to the negatively charged proteoglycans (PGs) within the cartilage tissue (Palmer et al. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103:19255–19260, 2006). This relationship allows for assessment of cartilage degradation, as areas of high X-ray attenuation have been shown to correspond to areas of depleted PGs (Palmer et al. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103:19255–19260, 2006; Xie et al. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 18:65–72, 2010).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Protocol
USD 49.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Palmer AW, Guldberg RE, Levenston ME (2006) Analysis of cartilage matrix fixed charge density and three-dimensional morphology via contrast-enhanced microcomputed tomography. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103:19255–19260

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Xie L, Lin AS, Guldberg RE et al (2010) Nondestructive assessment of sGAG content and distribution in normal and degraded rat articular cartilage via EPIC-microCT. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 18:65–72

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Gerwin N, Bendele AM, Glasson S et al (2010) The OARSI histopathology initiative—recommendations for histological assessments of osteoarthritis in the rat. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 18(Suppl 3):S24–S34

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Glasson SS, Chambers MG, Van Den Berg WB et al (2010) The OARSI histopathology initiative—recommendations for histological assessments of osteoarthritis in the mouse. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 18(Suppl 3):S17–S23

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Xie L, Lin AS, Levenston ME et al (2009) Quantitative assessment of articular cartilage morphology via EPIC-microCT. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 17:313–320

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Xie L, Lin AS, Kundu K et al (2012) Quantitative imaging of cartilage and bone morphology, reactive oxygen species, and vascularization in a rodent model of osteoarthritis. Arthritis Rheum 64:1899–1908

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Bansal PN, Joshi NS, Entezari V et al (2010) Contrast enhanced computed tomography can predict the glycosaminoglycan content and biomechanical properties of articular cartilage. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 18:184–191

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Bansal PN, Joshi NS, Entezari V et al (2011) Cationic contrast agents improve quantification of glycosaminoglycan (GAG) content by contrast enhanced CT imaging of cartilage. J Orthop Res 29:704–709

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Bansal PN, Stewart RC, Entezari V et al (2011) Contrast agent electrostatic attraction rather than repulsion to glycosaminoglycans affords a greater contrast uptake ratio and improved quantitative CT imaging in cartilage. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 19:970–976

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Hayward LN, de Bakker CM, Gerstenfeld LC et al (2013) Assessment of contrast-enhanced computed tomography for imaging of cartilage during fracture healing. J Orthop Res 31: 567–573

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kotwal N, Li J, Sandy J et al (2012) Initial application of EPIC-muCT to assess mouse articular cartilage morphology and composition: effects of aging and treadmill running. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 20:887–895

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Lakin BA, Grasso DJ, Shah SS et al (2013) Cationic agent contrast-enhanced computed tomography imaging of cartilage correlates with the compressive modulus and coefficient of friction. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 21:60–68

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Lakin BA, Grasso DJ, Stewart RC et al (2013) Contrast enhanced CT attenuation correlates with the GAG content of bovine meniscus. J Orthop Res 31:1765–1771. doi:10.1002/jor.22421

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Siebelt M, Waarsing JH, Kops N et al (2011) Quantifying osteoarthritic cartilage changes accurately using in vivo microCT arthrography in three etiologically distinct rat models. J Orthop Res 29:1788–1794

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Thote T, Lin AS, Raji Y et al (2013) Localized 3D analysis of cartilage composition and morphology in small animal models of joint degeneration. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 21: 1132–1141

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Lusic H, Grinstaff MW (2013) X-ray-computed tomography contrast agents. Chem Rev 113: 1641–1666

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert E. Guldberg Ph.D. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media. New York

About this protocol

Cite this protocol

Lin, A.S.P., Salazar-Noratto, G.E., Guldberg, R.E. (2015). EPIC-μCT Imaging of Articular Cartilage. In: Westendorf, J., van Wijnen, A. (eds) Osteoporosis and Osteoarthritis. Methods in Molecular Biology, vol 1226. Humana Press, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-1619-1_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-1619-1_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Humana Press, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-1618-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-1619-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Protocols

Publish with us

Policies and ethics