Abstract
Somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT) has a low success rate that rarely exceeds 5 %. Moreover, SCNT requires highly technical skills and may be influenced by the biological material used (oocyte and donor cell quality). Hence, it is crucial to check the normality of the donor cell’s karyotype. Numerical and structural chromosome abnormalities are detected by cytogenetic analysis at minimum using G-banding to identify the chromosomes. Here, we describe the classical protocols that are needed to perform complete cytogenetic analyses, i.e., G-banding to identify chromosome aberrations, followed by Fluorescent In Situ Hybridization (FISH) of specific probes for a more sensitive detection and precise identification of the rearrangement.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Fulka J Jr, Fulka H (2007) Somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT) in mammals: the cytoplast and its reprogramming activities. Adv Exp Med Biol 591:93–102
Guo J, Jauch A, Heidi HG et al (2005) Multicolor karyotype analyses of mouse embryonic stem cells. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim 41:278–283
Sugawara A, Goto K, Sotomaru Y et al (2006) Current status of chromosomal abnormalities in mouse embryonic stem cell lines used in Japan. Comp Med 56:31–34
Sumner AT (1972) A simple technique for demonstrating centromeric heterochromatin. Exp Cell Res 75:304–306
Seabright M (1971) A rapid banding technique for human chromosomes. Lancet 2:971–972
Ducos A, Pinton A, Yerle M et al (2002) Cytogenetic and molecular characterization of eight new reciprocal translocations in the pig species. Estimation of their incidence in French populations. Genet Sel Evol 34:389–406
Jouneau A, Ciaudo C, Sismeiro O et al (2012) Naive and primed murine pluripotent stem cells have distinct miRNA expression profiles. RNA 18:253–264
Maruotti J, Dai XP, Brochard V et al (2010) Nuclear transfer-derived epiblast stem cells are transcriptionally and epigenetically distinguishable from their fertilized-derived counterparts. Stem Cells 28:743–752
MacLeod RA, Drexler HG (2013) Classical and molecular cytogenetic analysis. Methods Mol Biol 946:39–60
Meisner LF, Johnson JA (2008) Protocols for cytogenetic studies of human embryonic stem cells. Methods 45:133–141
Ducos A, Revay T, Kovacs A et al (2008) Cytogenetic screening of livestock populations in Europe: an overview. Cytogenet Genome Res 120:26–41
Kubickova S, Cernohorska H, Musilova P et al (2002) The use of laser microdissection for the preparation of chromosome-specific painting probes in farm animals. Chromosome Res 10:571–577
Pinton A, Ducos A, Yerle M (2003) Chromosomal rearrangements in cattle and pigs revealed by chromosome microdissection and chromosome painting. Genet Sel Evol 35:685–696
Rubes J, Pinton A, Bonnet-Garnier A et al (2009) Fluorescence in situ hybridization applied to domestic animal cytogenetics. Cytogenet Genome Res 126:34–48
Acknowledgements
The authors wish to acknowledge Josette Catalan and the CeMEB Cytogenomics platform for their assistance in mouse stem cell karyotype analysis, Vincent Brochard and Sylvie Ruffini for their technical help in stem cells culturing and bovine fibroblast cultures respectively and Anne Calgaro and Alain Pinton for their advice on bovine karyotype analysis.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this protocol
Cite this protocol
Bonnet-Garnier, A., Veillard, AC., Bed’Hom, B., Hayes, H., Britton-Davidian, J. (2015). Assessing the Quality of Donor Cells: Karyotyping Methods. In: Beaujean, N., Jammes, H., Jouneau, A. (eds) Nuclear Reprogramming. Methods in Molecular Biology, vol 1222. Humana Press, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-1594-1_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-1594-1_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Humana Press, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-1593-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-1594-1
eBook Packages: Springer Protocols