Abstract
The use of vertebrate models allows researchers to investigate mechanisms of CCM pathogenesis in vivo, to investigate discrepancies between observations seen in the lab with in vitro experiments and how they translate into animal models; these in vivo models are more relevant in terms of CCM pathogenesis seen in humans than the in vitro counterparts. The use of CCM-deficient Zebrafish model offers advantages given their optical clarity during embryogenesis, short generation time, and high fecundity. When looking at the in vivo mouse model, gene conservation among CCM1, CCM2, and CCM3 is much higher among mammals (>92%), offering higher relevance in terms of similarities between what is seen in a mouse compared to human CCM pathogenesis. With both models, deficiencies in CCM1, CCM2, and CCM3 demonstrate perturbed cardiovascular development and underlying mechanisms of CCM pathogenesis at multiple stages seen in humans. The optimized methods described in this chapter allow researchers to benefit from both in vivo models, investigating impacts of deficiencies in CCM gene expression and its effect on angiogenesis and other signaling cascades, offering a much wider view of the molecular and cellular mechanisms in CCM progression.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Dooley K, Zon LI (2000) Zebrafish: a model system for the study of human disease. Curr Opin Genet Dev 10(3):252–256. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-437X(00)00074-5
Chan AC, Li DY, Berg MJ, Whitehead KJ (2010) Recent insights into cerebral cavernous malformations: animal models of CCM and the human phenotype. FEBS J 277(5):1076–1083. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1742-4658.2009.07536.x
Yoruk B, Gillers BS, Chi NC, Scott IC (2012) Ccm3 functions in a manner distinct from Ccm1 and Ccm2 in a zebrafish model of CCM vascular disease. Dev Biol 362(2):121–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ydbio.2011.12.006
Hogan BM, Bussmann J, Wolburg H, Schulte-Merker S (2008) ccm1 cell autonomously regulates endothelial cellular morphogenesis and vascular tubulogenesis in zebrafish. Hum Mol Gen 17(16):2424–2432. https://doi.org/10.1093/hmg/ddn142
Mably JD, Chuang LP, Serluca FC, Mohideen MA, Chen JN, Fishman MC (2006) Santa and valentine pattern concentric growth of cardiac myocardium in the zebrafish. Development 133(16):3139–3146. https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.02469
Zheng X, Xu C, Di Lorenzo A, Kleaveland B, Zou Z, Seiler C, Chen M, Cheng L, Xiao J, He J, Pack MA, Sessa WC, Kahn ML (2010) CCM3 signaling through sterile 20–like kinases plays an essential role during zebrafish cardiovascular development and cerebral cavernous malformations. J Clin Invest 120(8):2795–2804. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI39679
Liu H, Rigamonti D, Badr A, Zhang J (2010) Ccm1 assures microvascular integrity during angiogenesis. Transl Stroke Res 1:146–153. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12975-010-0010-z
Liu H, Rigamonti D, Badr A, Zhang J (2011) Ccm1 regulates microvascular morphogenesis during angiogenesis. J Vasc Res 48(2):130–140. https://doi.org/10.1159/000316851
Dietrich F, Lelkes PI (2006) Fine-tuning of a three-dimensional microcarrier-based angiogenesis assay for the analysis of endothelial-mesenchymal cell co-cultures in fibrin and collagen gels. Angiogenesis 9(3):111–125. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10456-006-9037-x
Nakatsu MN, Davis J, Hughes CC (2007) Optimized fibrin gel bead assay for the study of angiogenesis. J Vis Exp 3:186. https://doi.org/10.3791/186
Sacharidou A, Koh W, Stratman AN, Mayo AM, Fisher KE, Davis GE (2010) Endothelial lumen signaling complexes control 3D matrix-specific tubulogenesis through interdependent Cdc42- and MT1-MMP-mediated events. Blood 115(25):5259–5269. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2009-11-252692
Thisse C, Thisse B (2008) High-resolution in situ hybridization to whole-mount zebrafish embryos. Nat Protoc 3(1):59–69. https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2007.514
Braissant O, Wahli W (1998) A simplified in situ hybridization protocol using non-radioactively labelled probes to detect abundant and rare mRNAs on tissue sections. Biochemica 1:10–16
van de Corput MPC, Dirks RW, van Gijlswijk RPM, van de Rijke FM, Raap AK (1998) Fluorescence in situ hybridization using horseradish peroxidase-labeled oligodeoxynucleotides and tyramide signal amplification for sensitive DNA and mRNA detection. Histochem Cell Biol 110(4):431–437. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004180050304
Welten MC, de Haan SB, van den Boogert N, Noordermeer JN, Lamers GE, Spaink HP, Meijer AH, Verbeek FJ (2006) ZebraFISH: fluorescent in situ hybridization protocol and three-dimensional imaging of gene expression patterns. Zebrafish 3(4):465–476. https://doi.org/10.1089/zeb.2006.3.465
Kleaveland B, Zheng X, Liu JJ, Blum Y, Tung JJ, Zou Z, Sweeney SM, Chen M, Guo L, Lu M-m, Zhou D, Kitajewski J, Affolter M, Ginsberg MH, Kahn ML (2009) Regulation of cardiovascular development and integrity by the heart of glass–cerebral cavernous malformation protein pathway. Nat Med 15:169. https://doi.org/10.1038/nm.1918. https://www.nature.com/articles/nm.1918#supplementary-information
Plummer NW, Squire TL, Srinivasan S, Huang E, Zawistowski JS, Matsunami H, Hale LP, Marchuk DA (2006) Neuronal expression of the Ccm2 gene in a new mouse model of cerebral cavernous malformations. Mamm Genome 17(2):119–128. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00335-005-0098-8
Whitehead KJ, Chan AC, Navankasattusas S, Koh W, London NR, Ling J, Mayo AH, Drakos SG, Jones CA, Zhu W, Marchuk DA, Davis GE, Li DY (2009) The cerebral cavernous malformation signaling pathway promotes vascular integrity via rho GTPases. Nat Med 15:177. https://doi.org/10.1038/nm.1911. https://www.nature.com/articles/nm.1911#supplementary-information
Boulday G, Blecon A, Petit N, Chareyre F, Garcia LA, Niwa-Kawakita M, Giovannini M, Tournier-Lasserve E (2009) Tissue-specific conditional CCM2 knockout mice establish the essential role of endothelial CCM2 in angiogenesis: implications for human cerebral cavernous malformations. Dis Model Mech 2(3–4):168–177. https://doi.org/10.1242/dmm.001263
McDonald DA, Shenkar R, Shi C, Stockton RA, Akers AL, Kucherlapati MH, Kucherlapati R, Brainer J, Ginsberg MH, Awad IA, Marchuk DA (2011) A novel mouse model of cerebral cavernous malformations based on the two-hit mutation hypothesis recapitulates the human disease. Hum Mol Genet 20(2):211–222. https://doi.org/10.1093/hmg/ddq433
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature
About this protocol
Cite this protocol
Abou-Fadel, J., Zhang, J. (2020). Vertebrate Models to Investigate CCM Pathogenesis: The Zebrafish and Mouse Model. In: Trabalzini, L., Finetti, F., Retta, S. (eds) Cerebral Cavernous Malformations (CCM) . Methods in Molecular Biology, vol 2152. Humana, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-0640-7_17
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-0640-7_17
Published:
Publisher Name: Humana, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-0716-0639-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-0716-0640-7
eBook Packages: Springer Protocols