Abstract
With the development of semiquantitative PCR, scientists were able to begin looking at specific genes; however, this technique had several limitations. Specifically, semiquantitative PCR is an end point study, only yielding information on the expression of the target gene at the end of several amplification cycles, which, in turn, limits its ability to quantify gene expression based only on signal intensity. This signal could be affected by various factors, such as the number of cycles performed, and often the final product is oversaturated. In order to combat this limitation, scientists developed real-time PCR (qRT-PCR). qRT-PCR allowed for a “real time” view of gene expression by taking a reading after each individual amplification cycle. With these successive readings, qRT-PCR allows for a relative quantification of gene expression between an experimental group and its control using the “double delta” (2Δ equation). However, quantitative PCR has its own limitations. To address these limitations, a process known as digital droplet PCR (ddPCR) was developed. In this chapter readers would learn about the ddPCR technique and its applications.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Cao L, Cui X, Hu J et al (2017) Advances in digital polymerase chain reaction (dPCR) and its emerging biomedical applications. Biosens Bioelectron 90:459–474. https://doi.org/10.1016/jbios.2016.09.082
Quan PL, Sauzade M, Brouzes E (2018) dPCR: a technology review. Sensors (Basel) 18(4):E1271. https://doi.org/10.3390/s18041271
Yu M, Heinzerling TJ, Grady WM (2018) DNA methylation analysis using droplet digital PCR. Methods Mol Biol 1768:363–383. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-7778-9_21
Taylor SC, Laperriere G, Germain H (2017) Droplet digital PCR versus qPCR for gene expression analysis with low abundant targets: from variable nonsense to publication quality data. Sci Rep 7(1):2409. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-02217-x
Harmala SK, Butcher R, Roberts CH (2017) Copy number variation analysis by droplet digital PCR. Methods Mol Biol 1654:135–149. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-7231-9_9
Wang Y, Bergelson S, Feschenko M (2018) Determination of Lentiviral infectious titer by a novel droplet digital PCR method. Hum Gene Ther Methods 29(2):96–103. https://doi.org/10.1089/hgtb.2017.198
Mazaika E, Homsy J (2014) Digital droplet PCR: CNV analysis and other applications. Curr Protoc Hum Genet 82:7.24.1–7.2413. https://doi.org/10.1002/0471142905.hg0724s82
Gutierrez-Aguirre I, Racki N, Dreo T, Ravnikar M (2015) Droplet digital PCR for absolute quantification of pathogens. Methods Mol Biol 1302:331–347. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-2620-6_24
Van Ginkel JH, Huibers MMH, Van Es RJJ, De Bree R, Willems SM (2017) Droplet digital PCR for detection and quantification of circulating tumor DNA in plasma of head and neck cancer patients. BMC Cancer 17(1):428. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-017-3424-0
Van Wesenbeeck L, Janssens L, Meeuws H, Lagatie O, Stuyver L (2018) Droplet digital PCR is an accurate method to assess methylation status on FFPE samples. Epigenetics 13(3):207–213. https://doi.org/10.1080/15592294.2018.1448679
Postel M, Roosen A, Laurent-Puig O, Taly V, Wang-Renault SF (2018) Droplet-based digital PCR and next generation sequencing for monitoring circulating tumor DNA: a cancer diagnostic perspective. Expert Rev Mol Diagn 18(1):7–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/14737159.2018.1400384
Perkins G, Lu H, Garlan F, Taly V (2017) Droplet-based digital PCR: application in cancer research. Adv Clin Chem 79:43–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.acc.2016.10.001
Dobnik D, Stebih D, Blejec A, Morisset D, Zel J (2016) Multiplex quantification of four DNA targets in one reaction with bio-rad droplet digital PCR system for GMO detection. Sci Rep 6:35451. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep35451
Vossen RH, White SJ (2017) Quantitative DNA analysis using droplet digital PCR. Methods Mol Biol 1492:167–177. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-6442-0_11
Parkin B (2019) Rare variant quantitation using droplet digital PCR. Methods Mol Biol 1881:239–251. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-8876-1_18
Otsuji K, Sasaki T, Tanaka A et al (2017) Use of droplet digital PCR for quantitative and automatic analysis of the HER2 status in breast cancer patients. Breast Cancer Res Treat 162(1):11–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-016-4092-5
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature
About this protocol
Cite this protocol
Doxtater, K.A., Tripathi, M.K., Yallapu, M.M., Jaggi, M., Chauhan, S.C. (2020). Use of Droplet PCR in Biomedical Research. In: Gupta, N., Gupta, V. (eds) Experimental Protocols in Biotechnology. Springer Protocols Handbooks. Humana, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-0607-0_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-0607-0_13
Published:
Publisher Name: Humana, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-0716-0606-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-0716-0607-0
eBook Packages: Springer Protocols