Skip to main content

Myth: Patients with severe cerebrovascular accidents (CVA) require long-term bladder catheters

  • Chapter
Myths and Shibboleths in Nephrology
  • 82 Accesses

Abstract

Consequent to cerebrovascular events, variable bladder malfunction may occur ranging from difficulty in starting micturation and spontaneously emptying the bladder to physical weakness and inability to reach the bathroom in time. It would seem reasonable, therefore, to utilize a bladder catheter routinely for the first few days following a CVA severe enough to require hospitalization. Nevertheless, many acute stroke units routinely remove foley catheters when patients are more stable, especially prior to their transfer to rehabilitation departments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Michelson JD, Lotke PA, Steinberg ME. Urinary bladder management after total joint replacement surgery. N Engl J Med. 1988;319:321–326.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Kuroda K, Tatara K, Zhao L, Takotorige T. Shinsho F. Factors influencing prolonged hospital stay by elderly patients. Nippon Eiseigaku Zasshi. 1992;47:843–850.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Lapides JA, Diokno AC, Gould FR, Lowe BS. Further observations on self catheterization. J Urol. 1976;116:169.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Kass EH, Schneiderman LJ. Entry of bacteria into the urinary tracts of patients with inlying catheters. N Engl J Med. 1957;256:556.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Garibaldi RA, Burke JP, Dickman ML, Smith CB. Factors predisposing to bacteriur-ia during indwelling urethral catheterization. N Engl J Med. 1974;291:215.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Garibaldi RA, Britt MR, et al. Meatal colonization and catheter associated bacteruria. N Engl J Med. 1980;303:316.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Warren JW, Steinberg L, Hebel JR, Tenny JH. The prevalence of urethral catheterization in Maryland Nursing Homes. Arch Int Med. 1989;149:1535–1537.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Mosely CB. The impact of Federal Regulations on urethral catheterization in Virginia Nursing Homes. Am J Med Quality. 1996;11:222–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Zimakoff J, Pontoppidan B, Larsen SO, et al. The management of urinary catheters: compliance practice in Danish hospitals, nursing homes and home care to national guidelines. Scan J Urol Nephrol, 1995;29:299.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Mallappallil, M.C. (2002). Myth: Patients with severe cerebrovascular accidents (CVA) require long-term bladder catheters. In: Friedman, E.A., Anees, I. (eds) Myths and Shibboleths in Nephrology. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0407-7_24

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0407-7_24

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-0616-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-010-0407-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics