Skip to main content
Log in

The Tesistan, Mexico earthquake (Mw 4.9) of 11 May 2016: seismic-tectonic environment and resonance vulnerability on buildings

  • Published:
Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To highlight the importance of small earthquakes in seismic hazard, a study of the 11 May 2016, Mw 4.9, Tesistan, Mexico earthquake is presented. Due to the close proximity of the event to the city, accelerations were considerably higher than those caused by historical severe earthquakes (6.0 < Mw < 8.2). This paper addresses two objectives related to the Tesistan event: the first is to estimate the focal mechanism solution in order to place the event in the context of the tectonic environment of this area. The second is focused on a vulnerability evaluation of buildings that suffered resonance. Several building’s typologies with variations in construction system and height are assessed in terms of resonance with the structural and soil periods. The results show that around the Zapopan station, strong damage is expected in intermediate to high-rise buildings (12–30 m) with moment resistant frame systems and in reinforced concrete shear walls. Masonry structures around this station may not present resonance. In contrast, in the surroundings of the Guadalajara station, all intermediate height buildings from 9 to 21 m may present resonance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bandy WL and Pardo M (1994), “Statistical Examination of the Existence and Relative Motion of the Jalisco and Southern Mexico Blocks,” Tectonics, 13 (4): 755–768, DOI:https://doi.org/10.1029/94TC00594.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campillo M, Singh SK, Shapiro N, Pacheco J and Herrmann RB (1996), “Crustal Structure of the Mexican Volcanic Belt, Based on Group Velocity Dispersion,” Geophysics Journal International, 35: 361–370.

    Google Scholar 

  • Causse M, Laurendeau A, Perrault M, Douglas J, Bonilla LF and Guéguen P (2014), “Eurocode-Compatible Synthetic Time-Series as Input to Dynamic Analysis,” Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 12 (2): 755–768.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castillo-Aja R and Ramírez-Herrera MT (2017), “Updated Tsunami Catalog for the Jalisco-Colima Coast, Mexico, Using Data from Historical Archives,” Seismological Research Letters, 88 (1): 144–158, doi: https://doi.org/10.1785/0220160133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiauzzi L, Masi A, Mucciarelli M, Cassidy JF, Kutyn K, Traber J, Ventura C and Yao F (2012), “Estimate of Fundamental Period of Reinforced Concrete Buildings: Code Provisions vs. Experimental Measures in Victoria and Vancouver (BC, Canada),” 12th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering (WCEE), Lisbon.

  • Crowley H and Pinho R (2004), “Period-Height Relationship for Existing European Reinforced Concrete buildings,” Earthquake Engineering, 8 (1): 93–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crowley H and Pinho R (2006), “Simplified Equations for Estimating the Period of Vibration of Existing Buildings,” First European Conference on Earthquake Engineering and Seismology, Paper 1122.

  • Eurocode 8 (2004), Design of Structures for Earthquake Resistance. Part 1: General Rules, Seismic Actions and Rules for Buildings, European Standard.

  • Ferrari L, Pasquare G, Venegas S, Castillo D and Romero F (1994), “Regional Tectonics of Western Mexico and Its Implications for the Northern Boundary of the Jalisco Block,” Geofisica Internacional, 33: 139–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallipoli MR, Mucciarelli M and Vona M (2009), “Empirical Estimate of Fundamental Frequencies and Damping for Italian Buildings,” Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 38 (8): 973–988.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallipoli MR, Mucciarelli M, Šket-Motnikar B, Zupancic P, Gosar A, Prevolnik S, Herak M, Stipcevic J, Herak D, Milutinovic Z and Olumceva T (2010), “Empirical Estimates of Dynamic Parameters on a Large Set of European Buildings,” Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 8: 593–607.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garduño VH and Tibaldi A (1991), “Kinematic Evolution of the Continental Active Triple Junction of Western Mexican Volcanic Belt,” Comptes Rendus Academie des Sciences, 312: 135–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gehl P, Seyedi DM and Douglas J (2013), “Vector-Valued Fragility Functions for Seismic Risk Evaluation,” Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 11 (2): 365–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Global Centroid Moment Tensor (CMT) project, https://doi.org/www.globalcmt.org/CMTsearch.html (last access March 10 of 2017).

  • Goel KR and Chopra KA (1997), “Period Formulas for Moment-Resisting Frame Buildings,” Journal of Structural Engineering, 123: 1454–1461.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hong LL and Hwang WL (2000), “Empirical Formula for Fundamental Vibration Periods of Reinforced Concrete Buildings in Taiwan,” Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 29: 327–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ingham JM and Griffith MC (2011a), “The Performance of Unreinforced Masonry Buildings in the 2010/2011 Canterbury Earthquake Swarm,” Report to the Royal Commission of Inquiry, Christchurch, New Zealand: Canterbury Earthquakes Royal Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingham JM and Griffith MC (2011b), “The Performance of Earthquake Strengthened URM Buildings in the Christchurch CBD in the 22 February 2011 Earthquake,” Addendum Report to the Royal Commission of Inquiry, Christchurch, New Zealand: Canterbury Earthquakes Royal Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • INEGI (2010), Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía, Censo de población del municipio de Tlajomulco de Zúñiga, Jalisco 2000 y 2010. (in Spanish)

  • Irikura K (1986), “Prediction of Strong Accelerations Motions Using Empirical Green’s Function,” Proceedings of the 7 th Japan Earthquake Engineering Symposium, 151–156.

  • Lienert BR and Havskov J (1995), “A Computer Program for Locating Earthquakes Both Locally and Globally,” Seismological Research Letters, 66: 26–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luhr JF, Nelson SA, Allan JF and Carmichael ISE (1985), “Active Rifting in Southwestern Mexico: Manifestations of an Incipient Eastward Spreading-Ridge Jump,” Geology, 13: 54–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore G, Marone C, Carmichael ISE and Renne P (1994), “Basaltic Volcanism and Extension Near the Intersection of the Sierra Madre Volcanic Province and the Mexican Volcanic Belt,” Geological Society of America Bulletin, 106: 383–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nakamura Y (1989), “A Method for Dynamic Characteristics Estimation of Subsurface Using Microtremor on the Ground Surface,” Railway Technical Research Institute, 30: 25–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • NBCC (2005), National Building Code of Canada, National Research Council Canada.

  • NEHRP (1994), Recommended Provisions for the Development of Seismic Regulations for New Buildings, Building Seismic Safety Council, Washington D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nieto-Obregón J, Delgado-Argote L and Damon P (1985), “Geochronologic, Petrologic and Structural Data Related to Large Morphologic Features Between the Sierra Madre Occidental and the Mexican Volcanic Belt,” Geofisica Internacional, 24: 623–663.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliveira CS and Navarro M (2010), “Fundamental Periods of Vibration of RC Buildings in Portugal from In-Situ Experimental and Numerical Techniques,” Bulletin of Earthquake Enggineering, 8 (3): 609–642.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pacheco JF, Mortera Gutiérrrez CA, Delgado H, Singh SK, Valenzuela RW, Shapiro NM, Santoyo MA, Hurtado A, Barron R and Gutiérrez-Moguel E (1999), “Tectonic Significance of an Earthquake Sequence in the Zacoalco Half-Graben, Jalisco, Mexico,” Journal of South American Earth Sciences, 12: 557–565, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0895-981(99)00039-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Preciado A, Rodriguez O, Caro-Becerra JL and Lujan-Godinez R (2015), “Seismic Damage Scenarios at Territorial Scale on Unreinforced Masonry in Tlajomulco, Jalisco,” XX National Congress on Earthquake Engineering, Mexican Society of Civil Engineering, November 24–28, Acapulco, Mexico. (in Spanish).

  • Preciado A, Rodriguez O, Alejandro Ramirez-Gaytan, Rosales G, Caro JL and Lujan-Godinez R (2016a), “Seismic Vulnerability Indicators of the Franciscan Route churches in Tlajomulco, Mexico by Simplified Methods,” 10th International Conference on Structural Analysis of Historical Constructions (SAHC), September 13–15, Leuven, Belgium.

  • Preciado A, Sperbeck ST and Alejandro Ramirez-Gaytan (2016b), “Seismic Vulnerability Enhancement of Medieval and Masonry Bell Towers Externally Prestressed with Unbonded Smart Tendons,” Engineering Structures, 122: 50–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Preciado A, Budelmann H and Bartoli G (2016c), “Earthquake Protection of Colonial Bell Towers in Colima, Mexico with Externally Prestressed FRPs,” International Journal of Architectural Heritage, 10 (4): 499–515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramírez-Gaytán Alejandro, Jorge Aguirre and Carlos Huerta (2010), “Simulation of Accelerograms, Peak Ground Accelerations, and MMI for the Tecomán Earthquake of 21 January 2003,” Bulletin Seismological Society of America, 100 (5A): 2163–2173, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1785/0120090053.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • RCDF (2004), Construction Code of Mexico City, Government of Mexico City.

  • Selvans MM, Stock JM, DeMets C, Sanchez O and Marquez-Azua B (2011), “Constraints on Jalisco Block Motion and Tectonics of the Guadalajara Triple Junction from 1998–2001 Campaign GPS data,” Pure and Applied Geophysics, 168: 1435–1447, DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s0024-010-0201-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snoj J, Österreicher M and Dolšek M (2013), “The Importance of Ambient and Forced Vibration Measurements for the Results of Seismic Performance Assessment of Buildings Obtained by Using a Simplified Non-Linear Procedure: Case Study of an Old Masonry Building,” Bulletinn of Earthquake Engineering, 11 (6): 2105–2132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suárez G, Garcia-Acosta V and Gaulon R (1994), “Active Crustal Deformation in the Jalisco Block, Mexico: Evidence for a Great in the 16th Century,” Tectonophysics, 234 (1–2): 117–127, DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/0040-1951(94)90207-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suter M (2014), “Comment on Estimation of Ground Motion in Mexico City from a Repeat of the M1 7:0 Acambay Earthquake of 1912′ by S. K. Singh, A. Iglesias, M. Ordaz, X. Pérez-Campos, and L. Quintanar,” Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 104 (5): 2562–2564.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suter M (2015), “The A.D. 1567 M w 7.2 Ameca, Jalisco, Earthquake (Western Trans-Mexican Volcanic Belt): Surface Rupture Parameters, Seismogeological Effects, and Macroseismic Intensities from Historical Sources,” Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 105 (2A): 646–656.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suter M (2016), “Structure and Holeocene Rupture of the Morelia Fault, Trans-Mexican Volcanic Belt, and Their Significance for Seismic-Hazard Assessment,” Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 106 (5): 2376–2388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suter M (2017), “The 2 October 1847 M 1 5.7 Chapala Graben Triggered Earthquake (Trans-Mexican Volcanic Belt, West-Central Mexico): Macroseismic Observations and Hazard Implications,” Seismological Research Letters, 89 (1): 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • UBC (1997), Uniform Building Code, International Conference of Building Officials, Whittier, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • USGS, “Seismic Hazard Program,” Report of M w. 4.5 Tesistan Earthquake, https://doi.org/earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/eventpage/us10005gn4#origin.

  • Vidal F, Navarro M, Aranda C and Enomoto T (2014), “Changes in Dynamic Characteristics of Lorca RC Buildings from Pre- and Post-Earthquake Ambient Vibration Data,” Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 12 (5): 2095–2110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

The authors thank the Seismic Instrumentation Group of the Instituto de Ingeniería of UNAM for providing the accelerogram records and in particular engineers David Almora and Miguel Torres. They also thank SSN for providing regional data to estimate location and focal mechanism.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alejandro Ramírez-Gaytán.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ramírez-Gaytán, A., Preciado, A., Bandy, W.L. et al. The Tesistan, Mexico earthquake (Mw 4.9) of 11 May 2016: seismic-tectonic environment and resonance vulnerability on buildings. Earthq. Eng. Eng. Vib. 18, 579–595 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11803-019-0523-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11803-019-0523-8

Keywords

Navigation