Abstract
Social Network Analysis, Statistical Analysis, Content Analysis and other research methods were used to research online learning communities at Capital Normal University, Beijing. Analysis of the two online courses resulted in the following conclusions: (1) Social networks of the two online courses form typical core-periphery structures; (2) Social networks of the two online courses contain “structural holes,” where some actors position themselves to become potential opinion-leaders within their social networks; (3) Actors, variously positioned within a core-periphery structure, show quite significant differences in terms of knowledge building; (4) Taking “structural holes” into account, there exist considerable differences in knowledge building between opinion-leaders and non opinion-leaders; (5) Actors in the “core” and “structural hole” positions have very different characteristics in terms of knowledge building. These actors in particular play important roles in online learning communities, impacting on the level of the constructed knowledge.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Baldwin, T. T., Bedell, M. D., & Johnson, J. L. (1997). Social networks in a team-based MBA program: Effects on student satisfaction and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 40, 1369–1397.
Bartlett, A. (2000). Improving teacher education through electronic portfolios. In B. Benzie & D. Passey (Eds.), Proceedings of conference on educational uses of information and communication technology (pp. 296–297). Beijing: Publishing House of Electronic Industry.
Beasley, N., & Smyth, K. (2004). Expected and actual student use of an online learning. Electronic Journal on e-Learning, 2(1), 43–50.
Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (2003). Learning to work creatively with knowledge. In E. De Corte, L. Verschaffel, N. Entwistle, & J. Van Merriënboer (Eds.), Unraveling basic components and dimensions of powerful learning environments (pp. 55–68). Oxford: Elsevier Science.
Brass, D. J. (1981). Structural relationships, job characteristics and worker satisfaction and performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 26, 331–348.
Brass, D. J. (1984). Being in the right place: A structural analysis of individual influence in an organization. Administrative Science Quarterly, 29, 518–539.
Bryman, A. (2004). Social research methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Burt, R. S. (1992). Structural holes: The social structure of competition. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Burt, R. S. (1999). The social capital of opinion leaders. Annals, 566, 37–54.
Burt, R. S., Jannotta, J. E., & Mahoney, J. T. (1998). Personality correlates of structural holes. Social Networks, 20, 63–87.
Cho, H., Gay, G., Davidson, B., & Infraffea, A. (2007). Social networks, communication styles, and learning performance in a CSCL community. Computers & Education, 49, 309–329.
Cohen, D., & Prusak, L. (2001). In good company: How social capital makes organizations work. MA, Boston: Harvard Business Press.
Denzin, K., & Lincoln, S. (2005). Handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed.). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
Edward, G. C., & Richard, A. Z. (1979). Reliability and validity assessment. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
Elliot, J. (1991). Action research for educational change. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Emirbayer, M., & Goodwin, J. (1994). Network analysis, culture, and the problem of agency. American Journal of Sociology, 99, 1411–1454.
Freeman, L. C. (1979). Centrality in social networks, conceptual clarification. In R. A. J. Leenders, & S. M. Gabbay (Eds.), Corporate social capital and liability (pp. 215–239). Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Gunawardena, C. N., Lowe, C. M. A., & Anderson, T. (1997). Interaction analysis of a global online debate and the development of an interaction analysis model. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 17(4), 397–431.
Ibarra, H. (1993). Personal networks of women and minorities in management: A conceptual framework. Academy of Management Review, 18(1), 56–87.
Kilduff, M. (1992). The friendship network as a decision-making resource: Dispositional moderators of social influences on organizational choices. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62(1), 168–180.
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Liu, H. L. Z., Zhu, L. L., Chen, Y. Q., & Huang, R. H. (2005). 基于交互分析的协同知识建构的分析 [A research about collaborative knowledge building through interaction analysis]. 开放教育研究 [Open Education Research], (2), 31–37.
Liu, J. (2004). 社会网络分析导论 [An introduction to social network analysis]. Beijing: Social Sciences Academic Press.
McLean, R. S. (1999). Meta-Communication widgets for knowledge building in distance education. In C. Hoadley & J. Roschelle (Eds.), Designing new media for a new millenium: Collaborative technology for learning, education, and training, Proceedings of CSCL’1999 Conference (pp. 383–390). NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Mehra, A., Kilduff, M., & Brass, D. J. (2001). The social networks of high and low self-monitors: Implications for work place performances. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46(1), 121–146.
Murphy, E. (2004). Recognizing and promoting collaboration in an online asynchronous discussion. British Journal of Educational Technology, 4, 421–431.
Nonaka, I., & Konno, N. (1998). The concept of BA: Building a foundation for knowledge creation. California Management Review, 40(3), 40–54.
Qiu, Y. D. (2003). 以社会网络分析法评估工作团队知识创造与分享 [Evaluation of group knowledge building and knowledge sharing: Using Social Network Analysis method]. Degree theses, National Central University, Taiwan of China.
Richmond, V. P., Gorham, J. S., & McCroskey, J. C. (1987). The relationship between selected immediacy behaviors and cognitive learning. In M. L. McLaughlin (Ed.), Communication yearbook 10 (pp. 574–590). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Russo, T. C., & Koesten, J. (2005). Prestige, centrality, and learning: A social network analysis of an online class. Communication Education, 54(3), 254–261.
Scanlan, C. L. (2003). Reliability and validity of a student scale for assessing the quality of internet-based distance learning. Distance Learning Administration [Electronic version], 2(3). Available from http://www.westga.edu/~distance/ojdla/fall63/scanlan63. html
Sparrowe, R. T., Liden, R. C., & Kraimer, M. L. (2001). Social networks and the performance of individuals and groups. Academy of Management Journal, 44(2), 316–425.
Wang, L. (2004). 虚拟学习社区原理与应用 [The principle and application of virtual learning community]. Beijing: Higher Education Press.
Wang, L., Ma, R. X. (2009). 意见领袖在虚拟学习社区社会网络中的作用 [Role of opinion leader in the social network of virtual learning community]. 电化教育研究 [e-Education Research], (1), 54–58.
Yang, H. (2008). 社会网络视角下CSCL 中知识建构与知识传播的研究 [Knowledge building and communication in CSCL: Study from a social network perspective]. Unpublished Master Theses, Capital Normal University, China.
Xi, Y., & Tang, F. (2004). Multiplex multi-core pattern of network organizations: An exploratory study. Computational & Mathematical Organization Theory, 10, 179–195.
Zhang, G. L. (2003). 20 世纪传播学经典文本 [The selection of classic texts in communication]. Shanghai: Fudan University Press.
Zhang, W. Y. (2003). 远程教育研究中质的和量的研究设计之探讨 [On the research design of quality and quantity about distance education research]. 远程教育 [Distant Learning], (12), 54–59.
Zirkin, B., & Sumler, D. (1995). Interactive or non-interactive? That is the Question! An annotated bibliography. Journal of Distance Education, 10(1), 95–112.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wang, L. How social network position relates to knowledge building in online learning communities. Front. Educ. China 5, 4–25 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11516-010-0003-4
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11516-010-0003-4