Skip to main content
Log in

How social network position relates to knowledge building in online learning communities

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Frontiers of Education in China

Abstract

Social Network Analysis, Statistical Analysis, Content Analysis and other research methods were used to research online learning communities at Capital Normal University, Beijing. Analysis of the two online courses resulted in the following conclusions: (1) Social networks of the two online courses form typical core-periphery structures; (2) Social networks of the two online courses contain “structural holes,” where some actors position themselves to become potential opinion-leaders within their social networks; (3) Actors, variously positioned within a core-periphery structure, show quite significant differences in terms of knowledge building; (4) Taking “structural holes” into account, there exist considerable differences in knowledge building between opinion-leaders and non opinion-leaders; (5) Actors in the “core” and “structural hole” positions have very different characteristics in terms of knowledge building. These actors in particular play important roles in online learning communities, impacting on the level of the constructed knowledge.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baldwin, T. T., Bedell, M. D., & Johnson, J. L. (1997). Social networks in a team-based MBA program: Effects on student satisfaction and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 40, 1369–1397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartlett, A. (2000). Improving teacher education through electronic portfolios. In B. Benzie & D. Passey (Eds.), Proceedings of conference on educational uses of information and communication technology (pp. 296–297). Beijing: Publishing House of Electronic Industry.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beasley, N., & Smyth, K. (2004). Expected and actual student use of an online learning. Electronic Journal on e-Learning, 2(1), 43–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (2003). Learning to work creatively with knowledge. In E. De Corte, L. Verschaffel, N. Entwistle, & J. Van Merriënboer (Eds.), Unraveling basic components and dimensions of powerful learning environments (pp. 55–68). Oxford: Elsevier Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brass, D. J. (1981). Structural relationships, job characteristics and worker satisfaction and performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 26, 331–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brass, D. J. (1984). Being in the right place: A structural analysis of individual influence in an organization. Administrative Science Quarterly, 29, 518–539.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bryman, A. (2004). Social research methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burt, R. S. (1992). Structural holes: The social structure of competition. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burt, R. S. (1999). The social capital of opinion leaders. Annals, 566, 37–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burt, R. S., Jannotta, J. E., & Mahoney, J. T. (1998). Personality correlates of structural holes. Social Networks, 20, 63–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cho, H., Gay, G., Davidson, B., & Infraffea, A. (2007). Social networks, communication styles, and learning performance in a CSCL community. Computers & Education, 49, 309–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, D., & Prusak, L. (2001). In good company: How social capital makes organizations work. MA, Boston: Harvard Business Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denzin, K., & Lincoln, S. (2005). Handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed.). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edward, G. C., & Richard, A. Z. (1979). Reliability and validity assessment. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliot, J. (1991). Action research for educational change. Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emirbayer, M., & Goodwin, J. (1994). Network analysis, culture, and the problem of agency. American Journal of Sociology, 99, 1411–1454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, L. C. (1979). Centrality in social networks, conceptual clarification. In R. A. J. Leenders, & S. M. Gabbay (Eds.), Corporate social capital and liability (pp. 215–239). Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunawardena, C. N., Lowe, C. M. A., & Anderson, T. (1997). Interaction analysis of a global online debate and the development of an interaction analysis model. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 17(4), 397–431.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ibarra, H. (1993). Personal networks of women and minorities in management: A conceptual framework. Academy of Management Review, 18(1), 56–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kilduff, M. (1992). The friendship network as a decision-making resource: Dispositional moderators of social influences on organizational choices. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62(1), 168–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, H. L. Z., Zhu, L. L., Chen, Y. Q., & Huang, R. H. (2005). 基于交互分析的协同知识建构的分析 [A research about collaborative knowledge building through interaction analysis]. 开放教育研究 [Open Education Research], (2), 31–37.

  • Liu, J. (2004). 社会网络分析导论 [An introduction to social network analysis]. Beijing: Social Sciences Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLean, R. S. (1999). Meta-Communication widgets for knowledge building in distance education. In C. Hoadley & J. Roschelle (Eds.), Designing new media for a new millenium: Collaborative technology for learning, education, and training, Proceedings of CSCL’1999 Conference (pp. 383–390). NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mehra, A., Kilduff, M., & Brass, D. J. (2001). The social networks of high and low self-monitors: Implications for work place performances. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46(1), 121–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, E. (2004). Recognizing and promoting collaboration in an online asynchronous discussion. British Journal of Educational Technology, 4, 421–431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka, I., & Konno, N. (1998). The concept of BA: Building a foundation for knowledge creation. California Management Review, 40(3), 40–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Qiu, Y. D. (2003). 以社会网络分析法评估工作团队知识创造与分享 [Evaluation of group knowledge building and knowledge sharing: Using Social Network Analysis method]. Degree theses, National Central University, Taiwan of China.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richmond, V. P., Gorham, J. S., & McCroskey, J. C. (1987). The relationship between selected immediacy behaviors and cognitive learning. In M. L. McLaughlin (Ed.), Communication yearbook 10 (pp. 574–590). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russo, T. C., & Koesten, J. (2005). Prestige, centrality, and learning: A social network analysis of an online class. Communication Education, 54(3), 254–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scanlan, C. L. (2003). Reliability and validity of a student scale for assessing the quality of internet-based distance learning. Distance Learning Administration [Electronic version], 2(3). Available from http://www.westga.edu/~distance/ojdla/fall63/scanlan63. html

  • Sparrowe, R. T., Liden, R. C., & Kraimer, M. L. (2001). Social networks and the performance of individuals and groups. Academy of Management Journal, 44(2), 316–425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, L. (2004). 虚拟学习社区原理与应用 [The principle and application of virtual learning community]. Beijing: Higher Education Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, L., Ma, R. X. (2009). 意见领袖在虚拟学习社区社会网络中的作用 [Role of opinion leader in the social network of virtual learning community]. 电化教育研究 [e-Education Research], (1), 54–58.

  • Yang, H. (2008). 社会网络视角下CSCL 中知识建构与知识传播的研究 [Knowledge building and communication in CSCL: Study from a social network perspective]. Unpublished Master Theses, Capital Normal University, China.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xi, Y., & Tang, F. (2004). Multiplex multi-core pattern of network organizations: An exploratory study. Computational & Mathematical Organization Theory, 10, 179–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, G. L. (2003). 20 世纪传播学经典文本 [The selection of classic texts in communication]. Shanghai: Fudan University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, W. Y. (2003). 远程教育研究中质的和量的研究设计之探讨 [On the research design of quality and quantity about distance education research]. 远程教育 [Distant Learning], (12), 54–59.

  • Zirkin, B., & Sumler, D. (1995). Interactive or non-interactive? That is the Question! An annotated bibliography. Journal of Distance Education, 10(1), 95–112.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lu Wang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wang, L. How social network position relates to knowledge building in online learning communities. Front. Educ. China 5, 4–25 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11516-010-0003-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11516-010-0003-4

Keywords

Navigation