Skip to main content

Visualization as Heuristics: The Use of Maps and Diagrams in 19th Century Epidemiology

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Model-Based Reasoning in Science and Technology

Part of the book series: Studies in Applied Philosophy, Epistemology and Rational Ethics ((SAPERE,volume 27))

  • 630 Accesses

Abstract

In this paper, I argue that visualization and the use of figures represent genuine heuristic, knowledge-enhancing tools in scientific inquiry; in fact, visualization shows a distinctive ability in producing genuinely new knowledge by filling theoretical gaps and in solving problems. I show, then, how visualization can be rightfully appraised as a plausible model for the growth of knowledge, gaining a paramount importance when used at the frontier of research. Unrelated here to the notion of intuition, visualization is treated as an ampliative inference and, being obviously related to figures and vision it is also a way of representing knowledge: this double function justifies it as a non-trivial heuristic device, not replaceable by axiomatic-deductive reasoning. A case study is proposed, regarding the London cholera epidemic, spread between August and September 1854. I show how the recourse to dot maps and a “primitive” version of network Voronoi diagrams as instruments of inquiry helped in filling the then existing theoretical gaps consisting in the ignorance of the existence and action of bacteria in disease transmission. Visualization, on the one hand, acted as an effective problem-solving activity, as it permitted the formulation of a successful strategy to stop the spreading of the epidemic; on the other, through the identification of new causes responsible for the spreading of the epidemic, it allowed to surpass the critical theoretical gap at the frontier of epidemiological knowledge.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Snow (1855) p. 24.

  2. 2.

    Ibidem, p. 28.

  3. 3.

    Okabe (2012), p. 43.

  4. 4.

    This distinction recalls the one between epistemological and heuristic characteristics of visualization proposed in the Introduction.

References

  • Cellucci, C. (2002). Filosofia e matematica. Laterza: Roma.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cellucci, C. (2006). The question Hume didn’t ask: Why should we accept deductive inferences? In C. Cellucci & P. Pecere (Eds.), Demonstrative and non-demonstrative reasoning in mathematics and natural sciences. Cassino: Edizioni dell’Università di Cassino.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cellucci, C. (2008). Perché ancora la filosofia. Laterza: Roma.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cellucci, C. (2013). Rethinking logic: Logic in relation to mathematics, evolution and method. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cellucci, C. (2014). Knowledge, truth and plausibility. Axiomathes, 24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandrasekharan, S., & Neressian, N. J. (2014). Building cognition: The construction of computational representations for scientific discovery. Cognitive Science. doi:10.1111/cogs.12203

    Google Scholar 

  • Giaquinto, M. (2008). Visualising in mathematics. In P. Mancosu (Ed.), The philosophy of mathematical practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grosholz, E. (2005). Constructive ambiguity in mathematical reasoning. In C. Cellucci & D. Gillies (Eds.), Mathematical reasoning and heuristics. London: King’s College Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grosholz, E. (2007). Representation and productive ambiguity in mathematics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grosholz, E. (2011a). The representation of time in Galileo, Newton and Leibniz: Reference and analysis. Journal of the History of Ideas, 72(3).

    Google Scholar 

  • Grosholz, E. (2011b). Logic, Mathematics, heterogeneity. In C. Cellucci, E. Grosholz, & E. Ippoliti (Eds.), Logic and knowledge. Newcastle Upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ippoliti, E. (2002). Cognitive visualization of some integer-valued Polynomials. Visual Mathematics, 4(13).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ippoliti, E. (2008). Inferenze ampliative. Visualizzazione, analogia e rappresentazioni multiple. Morrisville, Lulu Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ippoliti, E. (2011). Between data and hypotheses. In c Cellucci, E. Grosholz, & E. Ippoliti (Eds.), Logic and knowledge. Newcastle Upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ippoliti, E. (2014). Generation of hypotheses by ampliation of data. In L. Magnani (Ed.), Model-based reasoning in science and technology, studies in applied philosophy, epistemology, and rational ethics (Vol. 8). Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laudan, L. (1977). Progress and its problems. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magnani, L. (2001). Abduction, reason and science. Processes of discovery and explanation. New York: Kluwer Academic.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Magnani, L. (2013). Are heuristics knowledge-enhancing? Abduction, models, and fictions in science. In E. Ippoliti (Ed.), Heuristic reasoning. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mancosu, P. (2005). Visualization in logic and mathematics. In K. Jorgensen, P. Mancosu, & S. Pedersen (Eds.), Visualization, explanation and reasoning styles in mathematics. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • McLeod, K. S. (2000). Our sense of Snow: the myth of John Snow in medical geography. Social Science and Medicine, 50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nickles, T., & Meheus, J. (Eds.). (2009). Models of discovery and creativity. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Okabe, A., Boots, B., & Sugihara, K. (1992). Spatial tessellations: Concepts and applications of Voronoi diagrams. Toronto: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Okabe, A., & Sugihara, K. (2012). Spatial analysis along networks. Statistical and computational Methods. Toronto: Wiley.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Seaman, V. (1797). An inquiry into the cause of the prevalence of yellow fever in New York. Medical Repository, 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snow, J. (1855). On the modes of communication of cholera. London: John Churchill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson, L. G. (1965). Putting disease on the map. The Early Use of Spot Maps in the Study of Yellow Fever. Journal of the History of Medicine and Allied Sciences, 20 XX, (Vol.8), 226–261. doi:10.1093/jhmas/XX.3.226

    Google Scholar 

  • Tufte, E. (1997). Visual explanations. Images and quantities, Evidence and narrative. Cheshire Connecticut: Graphics Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weisberg, R. W. (2006). Creativity, understanding innovation in problem solving, science, invention and the arts. Hoboken: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Giulia Miotti .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Miotti, G. (2016). Visualization as Heuristics: The Use of Maps and Diagrams in 19th Century Epidemiology. In: Magnani, L., Casadio, C. (eds) Model-Based Reasoning in Science and Technology. Studies in Applied Philosophy, Epistemology and Rational Ethics, vol 27. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-38983-7_37

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics