Skip to main content

Impact of Different UHBR-Engine Positions on the Aerodynamics of a High-Lift Wing

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Simulation of Wing and Nacelle Stall (FOR 1066 2014)

Part of the book series: Notes on Numerical Fluid Mechanics and Multidisciplinary Design ((NNFM,volume 131))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

To meet the demands of society and air transport regarding more efficient transport aircraft [1], improvement of the aerodynamic performance of high-lift systems during take-off and landing is of importance. Novel closely coupled Ultra-High-Bypass-Ratio-Engines (UHBR) are equipped with a geared fan which enables to achieve a lower noise emission and to maximize propulsion-efficiency. However, the flow around these engines differs from existing engines which has a strong impact on the achievable high-lift performance and stall behavior. The integration of these modern UHBR-engines into transport aircraft configurations is therefore an aerodynamic research topic that promises to be a major contribution in reaching the claimed goals. The DLR Institute of Aerodynamics and Flow Technology is currently investigating these integration effects in the sub-project MOVE.ON-LEDCCEN of the Luftfahrtforschungsprogramm IV-4 funded by the BMWi [3]. In this project different engine positions on a high-lift wing were investigated in a numerical study using RANS-CFD for several angle of attack settings. The extent of the leading edge devices was adjusted with the horizontal and the streamwise engine position through an integrated design. Thus, the maximum possible slat-length and the minimum required free cross-section between inboard- and outboard-slat were obtained for all engine positions. The investigation was conducted with a generic swept untapered wing based on the DLR-F15 airfoil in landing configuration [10] that depicts, together with a generic UHBR-engine with take-off thrust rating, a go-around flight attitude. The results of the study to be presented focus on the effects of the engine position on achievable maximum lift coefficient and on lift-to-drag ratio to identify an optimal engine position related to high-lift performance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. European Commission et al. Flightpath 2050. Europe’s Vision for Aviation. Report of the High Level Group on Aviation Research (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Dirk M.: Franke. Multidisciplinary optimization of a generic 2d high-lift configuration regarding kinematics, aerodynamics and flight mechanics. AIAA-Paper-No. 2012–3017 (June 2012)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bundesministerium für Wirtschaft und Energie. Luftfahrtforschungsprogramm des Bundes (LuFo) (July 2014). http://www.bmwi.de (visited on July 3, 2014)

  4. Gerhold, T., Friedrich, O., Evans, J., Galle, M.: Calculation of complex three-dimensional configurations employing the DLR-TAU-code. AIAA paper 167, 10 (1997). AIAA-Paper-No. 97–0167

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kallinderis, Y., Khawaja, A., McMorris, H.: Hybrid prismatic/tetrahedral grid generation for viscous flows around complex geometries. AIAA Journal 34(2), 291–298 (1996)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Korbacher, G.K.: Aerodynamics of powered high-lift systems. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics 6(1), 319–358 (1974)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Rudnik, R., Rossow, C.-C., v. Geyr, H.F.: Numerical simulation of engine/airframe integration for high-bypass engines. Aerospace Science and Technology 6(1), 31–42 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Spalart, P.R., Allmaras, S.R.: A one equation turbulence model for aerodinamic flows. AIAA Journal 94 (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Wild, J.: Thrust/drag bookkeeping and aerodynamic force brakedown over components. Technical Report DLR-IB 129–99, German Aerospace Center - Institute of Aerodynamics and Flow Technology, Braunschweig, March 1999

    Google Scholar 

  10. Wild, J.: Mach and Reynolds number dependencies of the stall behavior of high-lift wing-sections. Journal of Aircraft 50(4), 1202–1216 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sebastian Ritter .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Ritter, S. (2016). Impact of Different UHBR-Engine Positions on the Aerodynamics of a High-Lift Wing. In: Radespiel, R., Niehuis, R., Kroll, N., Behrends, K. (eds) Advances in Simulation of Wing and Nacelle Stall. FOR 1066 2014. Notes on Numerical Fluid Mechanics and Multidisciplinary Design, vol 131. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21127-5_22

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21127-5_22

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-21126-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-21127-5

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics