Skip to main content

Criteria for Crosswind Variations during Approach and Touchdown at Airports

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Simulation of Wing and Nacelle Stall (FOR 1066 2014)

Part of the book series: Notes on Numerical Fluid Mechanics and Multidisciplinary Design ((NNFM,volume 131))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Landing in adverse wind conditions in a majorairport can sometimes result in incidents, which in some cases can be attributed to the local infrastructure. The measurement of the representative wind near a runway and touchdown zone is discussed including the influence of the built environment on the wind conditions and how representative they are. Localised rapidly changing wind conditions, or building induced turbulence, will result in aircraft attitude changes (and occasionally with consequences like hard landings, pod strikes or go-arounds). The development of the original crosswind criterion and the extended criteria which limit the crosswind and headwind variations, are presented and their application to the built environment of airports is discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Airbus, Flight Operations Briefing Notes - Landing Techniques - Crosswind Landings. Tech. rep., Airbus (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Khatwa, R., Helmreich, R.: Analysis of Critical Factors During Approach and Landing in Accidents and Normal Flight. Tech. Rep. Flight Safety Digest Volume 17 & 18, Flight Safety Foundation (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  3. FAA, Runway Overrun Prevention. Tech. Rep. Advisory Circular AC 91–79, Federal Aviation Administration (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  4. FSF, Reducing the Risk of Runway Excursions - Report of the Runway Safety Initiative. Tech. rep., Flight Safety Foundation (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Chan, P.W., Lo, W.Y., Leung, D.Y.C.: In The 5th Int. Symp. on Computational Wind Engineering (CWE2010) (Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA, 2010)

    Google Scholar 

  6. AAIB, AAIB Bulletin: 6/2002, Airbus Industrie A300, G-MONS. Tech. Rep. EW/C2002/02/05, Air Accidents Investigation Branch (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  7. ATSB, Boeing Co 737–476, VH-TJG, Canberra Airport, 5 November 2002. Tech. Rep. ATSB-200205179, Australian Transport Safety Bureau (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  8. AAIB, Multiple nacelle ground collisions, Boeing 747–412, B-KAG. Tech. Rep. EW/C2008/03/01, Air Accidents Investigation Branch (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  9. AAIB, Serious incident during aborted landing, Airbus A300-B4-622R, TF-ELK. Tech. Rep. EW/C2011/01/03, Air Accidents Investigation Branch (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  10. BFU, Untersuchungsbericht zu einer schweren Störung in Hamburg. Tech. Rep. 5X003-0/08, Bundesstelle für Flugunfalluntersuchung (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  11. NTSB, Runway Side Excursion During Atttempted Takeoff in Strong and Gusty Crosswind Conditions, Continental Airlines Flight 1404, Boeing 737–500, N18611, Denver, Colorado, December 20, 2008. Tech. Rep. NTSB/AAR-10/04, National Transportation Safety Board (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Rijkoort, P.: Reductie van windsnelheidsgemiddelden van de anemometer op de toren te De Bilt in verband met de bepaling van windnormalen. Tech. Rep. KNMI V-159, KNMI, De Bilt (1964)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Wieringa, J.: Boundary Layer Meteorology 3, 424 (1973)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Wieringa, J.: Bestaat representatieve grondwindmeeting? Tech. Rep. KNMI V-257, KNMI, De Bilt (1974)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Wieringa, J.: Quart. J. Royal Meteorological Soc. 102(431), 241 (1976)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Beljaars, A.C.M.: De invloed van meetsystemen op de waarneming van gemiddelden, standaarddeviaties en maxima. Tech. Rep. WR 83–2, KNMI, De Bilt (1983)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Beljaars, A.C.M.: The measurement of gustiness at routine wind stations: a review. Tech. Rep. WR 87–11, KNMI, De Bilt (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Verkaik, J.W.: Journal of Applied Meteorology 39(9), 1613 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Wichers Schreur, B., Geertsema, G.: HIRLAM Newsletter 54 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Panofsky, H.A., Dutton, J.A.: Atmospheric turbulence models and methods for engineering aplications (John Wiley & Sons Ltd., 1984)

    Google Scholar 

  21. WMO, Guide to Meteorological Instruments and Methods of Observation. Report WMO-No.8, World Meteorological Organization (WMO) (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Krüs, H.W., Haanstra, J.O., van der Ham, R., Wichers Schreur B.: Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics 91, 1215 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  23. van Es, G.W.H.: Analysis of existing practices and issues regarding near-ground wind gust information for flight crews. Tech. Rep. NLR-CR-2012-143, National Aerospace Laboratory NLR (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Lelaie, C.: A380 Flight tests (presentation). Tech. rep, Airbus (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  25. AAIU, Serious incident to MD 11, N803DE, at Dublin Airport, 3 February 2002. Tech. Rep. AAIU-2003/004, Air Accident Investigation Unit (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Nieuwpoort, A.M.H., Gooden, J.H.M., de Prins, J.L.: Wind criteria due to obstacles at and around airports. Tech. Rep. NLR-CR-2006-261, Nationaal Lucht- en Ruimtevaart Laboratorium, NLR (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Eurocontrol, A Study of Runway Excursions from a European Perspective. Tech. Rep. 10/04/13-59, European Organisation for the Safety of Air Navigation (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  28. A.M.H. Nieuwpoort, J.H.M. Gooden, J.L. de Prins, Wind criteria due to obstacles at and around airports. Tech. Rep. NLR-TP-2010-312, Nationaal Lucht- en Ruimtevaart Laboratorium, NLR (2010)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Henk W. Krüs .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Krüs, H.W. (2016). Criteria for Crosswind Variations during Approach and Touchdown at Airports. In: Radespiel, R., Niehuis, R., Kroll, N., Behrends, K. (eds) Advances in Simulation of Wing and Nacelle Stall. FOR 1066 2014. Notes on Numerical Fluid Mechanics and Multidisciplinary Design, vol 131. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21127-5_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21127-5_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-21126-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-21127-5

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics