Skip to main content

Heuristics

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science

Heuristics are strategies that ignore information in order to make faster decisions. Traditional theories of decision-making (including the highly influential “heuristics-and-biases framework”; Tversky and Kahneman 1974) suggest that heuristics are suboptimal shortcuts that lead to systematic errors, trading accuracy for speed. These frameworks imply that heuristics are irrational and that decision-makers would be better off if they could avoid heuristics altogether.

In reality, heuristics are extremely sensible, having proven to be reliable tools for successfully navigating diverse situations of uncertainty (Gigerenzer et al. 1999, 2011; Gigerenzer and Gaissmaier 2011). For example, Ortmann et al. (2008) observed that, on average, stock portfolios created using the recognition heuristic(i.e., if one option is recognized and the other is not, choose the recognized option) outperformed unplanned portfolios, the market, managed funds, and stock experts. Heuristics are not only useful...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Axelrod, R., & Hamilton, W. D. (1981). The evolution of cooperation. Science, 211, 1390–1396.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gigerenzer, G. (2007). Gut feelings: The intelligence of the unconscious. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gigerenzer, G., & Gaissmaier, W. (2011). Heuristic decision-making. Annual Review of Psychology, 62, 451–482.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gigerenzer, G., Todd, P. M., & the ABC Research Group. (1999). Simple heuristics that make us smart. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gigerenzer, G., Hertwig, R., & Pachur, T. (2011). Heuristics: The foundations of adaptive behavior. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gonzales, J., Mishra, S., & Camp, R. D. (2017). For the win: Risk-sensitive decision-making in teams. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 30, 462–472.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLeod, P., & Dienes, Z. (1996). Do fielders know where to go to catch the ball or only how to get there? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 22(3), 531.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mishra, S. (2014). Decision-making under risk: Integrating perspectives from biology, economics, and psychology. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 18, 280–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ortmann, A., Gigerenzer, G., Borges, B., & Goldstein, D. G. (2008). The recognition heuristic: A fast and frugal way to investment choice? Handbook of Experimental Economics Results, 1, 993–1003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scheibehenne, B., Miesler, L., & Todd, P. M. (2007). Fast and frugal food choices: Uncovering individual decision heuristics. Appetite, 49(3), 578–589.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaffer, D. M., Krauchunas, S. M., Eddy, M., & McBeath, M. K. (2004). How dogs navigate to catch Frisbees. Psychological Science, 15(7), 437–441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H. A. (1990). Invariants of human behavior. Annual Review of Psychology, 41(1), 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185, 1124–1131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sandeep Mishra .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Gonzales, J., Mishra, S. (2018). Heuristics. In: Shackelford, T., Weekes-Shackelford, V. (eds) Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6_626-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6_626-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-16999-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-16999-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Behavioral Science and PsychologyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics