Definition
Romantic or sexual partner selection by men; characteristics that guide male choice of their romantic or sexual partners.
Introduction
According to the Parental Investment Theory (Trivers 1972), males and females present their mating strategies related to the investment they make in their offspring. In general, females tend to invest more time and energy in their children. Males, on the other hand, do not invest in offspring as much as females do, and the low paternal investment necessity allows them to invest more time and energy in mating effort. For them, engaging more in short-term relationships, with different sexual partners, increases their probability of having a greater reproductive success since they can have more children in a short period of time. Therefore, men’s reproductive success is limited by their access to women, which leads them to compete to have access to females, a limiting resource.
Se...
References
Buss, D. M. (1989). Sex differences in human mate preference: Evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 12(1), 1–49.
Buss, D. M., & Schmitt, D. P. (1993). Sexual strategies theory: An evolutionary perspective on human mating. Psychological Review, 100(2), 204–232. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.100.2.204.
Karremans, J., Frankenhuis, W., & Arons, S. (2010). Blind men prefer a low waist-to-hip ratio. Evolution and Human Behavior, 31, 182–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2009.10.001.
Kenrick, D., & Keefe, R. (1992). Age preferences in mate reflect sex differences in human reproductive strategies. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 15, 75–133. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00067595.
Kruger, D., Fitzgerald, C., & Peterson, T. (2010). Female scarcity reduces women’s marital ages and increases variance in men’s marital ages. Evolutionary Psychology, 8(3), 420–431. PMid:22947810.
Pawlowski, B. (2000). The biological meaning of preferences on the human mate market. Anthropological Review, 63, 39–72. Retrieved from: http://www.academia.edu/3298609/The_biological_meaning_of_preferences_on_the_human_mate_market.
Penke, L., & Denissen, J. (2008). Sex differences and lifestyle-dependent shifts in the attunement of self-esteem to self- perceived mate value: Hints to an adaptive mechanism? Journal of Research in Personality, 42, 1123–1129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2008.02.003.
Trivers, R. (1972). Parental investment and sexual selection. In B. Campbell (Ed.), Sexual selection and the descent of man (pp. 136–179). Chicago: Aldine- Atherton.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Section Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this entry
Cite this entry
Mafra, A.L. (2019). Male Mate Choice. In: Shackelford, T., Weekes-Shackelford, V. (eds) Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6_1410-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6_1410-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-16999-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-16999-6
eBook Packages: Springer Reference Behavioral Science and PsychologyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences