Abstract
Since Guilford (1950) first suggested divergent thinking as a component of human cognition, creativity has been associated with positive qualities, characteristics, and outcomes. On the one hand, Bruner (1962) saw creativity as a defining characteristic of human intelligence, distinguishing it from impersonal, cold, machine intelligence. A. J. Cropley drew together these positive views, which he suggested see creativity as” a principle of nature and that it is, by définition, a universal bénéficiai force fostering growth and rebuilding in all organic systems” (2010a, p. 2). In parallel with this view, creativity also has long been seen as good for the individual, and it is associated with many positive personal properties, such as courage, openness to experience, and flexibility, as well as offering bénéficiai effects for mental health (Cropley, 1990). Adding to these positive perspectives, creativity is understood to be vital culturally and organizationally” for shaping... future orientations and actualizing reforms in political, economic and cultural areas” (Oral, 2006, p. 65) and economically” as the key to meeting challenges... arising from technological advances, social change, globalization, and now the global financial crisis” (Cropley, 2010a, p. 3). In fact, whether creativity is defined and studied in relation to the person, the process, the product, or the press (environment)—namely, the 4Ps (Rhodes, 1961)—a great deal of attention is paid to the positive aspects of creativity.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Blumrich, J. R (1970). Design. Science, 168, 1551–1554.
Bruner, J. S. (1962). The creative surprise. In H. E. Gruber, G. Terrell, & M. Wertheimer (eds.), Contemporary Approaches to Creative Thinking (pp. 1–30). New York: Atherton.
Cropley, A. J. (1990). Creativity and mental health in everyday life. Creativity Research Journal, 3(3), 167–178.
Cropley, A. J. (2010a). The dark side ol creativity. In D. H. Cropley, A. J. Cropley, J. C. Kaulman, & M. A. Runco (eds.), The Dark Side of Creativity (pp. 1–14). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Cropley, D. H. (2010b). Summary—The dark side ol creativity: A differentiated model. In D. H. Cropley, A. J. Cropley, J. C. Kaulman, & M. A. Runco (eds.), The Dark Side of Creativity (pp. 360–374). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Cropley, D. H., & Cropley, A.J. (2005). Engineering creativity: A systems concept of functional creativity. In J. C. Kaufman & J. Baer (eds.), Faces of the Muse: How People Think, Work and Act Creatively in Diverse Domains (pp. 169–185). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Cropley, D. H., & Cropley, A. J. (2012). A psychological taxonomy of organizational innovation: Resolving the paradoxes. Creativity Research Journal, 24(1), 29–40.
Cropley, D. H., & Cropley, A. J. (2013). Creativity and Crime: A Psychological Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cropley, D. H., Kaufman, J. C, & Cropley, A. J. (2008). Malevolent creativity: A functional model of creativity in terrorism and crime. Creativity Research Journal, 20(2), 105–115.
Cropley, D. H., Cropley, A. J., Kaufman, J. C, & Runco, M. A. (eds.). (2010). The Dark Side of Creativity. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Dieter, G. E., & Schmidt, L. C. (2012). Engineering Design, 5th edn. New York: McGraw-Hill Higher Education.
Fleddermann, C. B. (2004). Engineering Ethics, 2nd edn. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
Guilford, J. P. (1950). Creativity. American Psychologist, 5, 444–454.
Guilford, J. P. (1967). The Nature of Human Intelligence. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Horenstein, M. N. (2002). Design Concepts for Engineers, 2nd edn. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Hursthouse, R. (1999). On Virtue Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Isaksen, S. G., & Treffinger, D. J. (2004). Celebrating 50 years of reflective practice: Versions of creative problem solving. Journal of Creative behavior, 38(2), 75–101.
Kant, I., Wood, A. W., & Schneewind, J. B. (2002). Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
MacKinnon, D. W. (1978). In Search of Human Effectiveness: Identifying and Developing Creativity. Buffalo, NY: Creative Education Foundation.
Martindale, C, & Moore, K. (1988). Priming, prototypicality, and preference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 14(4), 661–670.
Mill, J. S. (2007). Utilitarianism, Liberty and Representative Government. Rockville, MD: Wildside Press.
Oral, G. (2006). Creativity of Turkish prospective teachers. Creativity Research Journal, 18(1), 65–73.
Osborn, A. F. (1953). Applied Imagination. New York: Scribners.
Plucker, J. A., Beghetto, R. A., & Dow, G. T. (2004). Why isn’t creativity more important to educational psychologists? Potentials, pitfalls, and future directions in creativity research. Educational Psychologist, 39(2), 83–96.
Puccio, G., & Cabra, J. (2009). Creative problem solving: Past, present and future. The Routledge Companion to Creativity (pp. 327–337). Oxford: Routledge.
Puccio, G. J., Murdock, M. C, & Mance, M. (2005). Current developments in creative problem solving for organizations: A focus on thinking skills and styles. Korean Journal of Thinking and Problem Solving, 15(2), 43–76.
Rhodes, M. (1961). An analysis of creativity. ThePhi Delta Kappan, 42(7), 305–310.
Russ, S. W., & Fiorelli, J. A. (2010). Developmental approaches to creativity. Inj. C. Kaufman & R.J. Sternberg (eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Creativity (pp. 233–249). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Salcedo-Albarân, E., Kuszewski, A., de Leon-Beltran, L, & Garay, L. J. (2009). Rule-breaking from illegality: A trans-disciplinary inquiry. METODO Working Papers No. 63. Bogota: Grupo Metodo.
Silvia, P. J., & Brown, E. M. (2007). Anger, disgust, and the negative aesthetic emotions: Expanding an appraisal model of aesthetic experience. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 2(2), 100–106.
Torrance, E. P. (1966). Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking: Technical Norms Manual. Lexington, MA: Personnel Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2014 David H. Cropley
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Cropley, D.H. (2014). Engineering, Ethics, and Creativity: N’er the Twain Shall Meet?. In: Moran, S., Cropley, D., Kaufman, J.C. (eds) The Ethics of Creativity. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137333544_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137333544_9
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-137-33352-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-33354-4
eBook Packages: Palgrave Social Sciences CollectionSocial Sciences (R0)