Skip to main content

The Development of Moral Imagination

  • Chapter
The Ethics of Creativity

Abstract

Creativity has been defined as the ability to generate ideas that are original and unexpected, but are considered useful or important (Sternberg, 1999). Moral imagination involves not only the ability to generate useful ideas, but also the abilities to form ideas about what is good and right, and to put the best ideas into action for the service of others. This involves sensitivity to the people and lifescapes at hand. The everyday world is populated with opportunities to steer consciously through the shoals of social relationships and decide what sort of agent to be. Research into mental preoccupations indicates that individuals ponder moral and relational issues much of the time (Klinger, 1978). Thus, on a daily basis, people employ one of humanity’s greatest gifts: moral imagination. But what fosters the development of moral imagination and determines to what extent it is used to benefit humanity? How does the morally imaginative individual utilize emotional and social experiences, reasoning, and selection to produce imaginative moral action? These are the questions that this chapter addresses.

A man, to be greatly good, must imagine intensely and comprehensively; he must put himself in the place of many others... the great instrument of moral good is the imagination. Percy Bysshe Shelley 1821, p. 13

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 24.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 37.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Ariely, D. (2012). The (Honest) Truth about Dishonesty: How We Lie to Everyone— Especially Ourselves. New York: HarperCollins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1999). Moral disengagement in the perpetration ol inhumanities. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 3, 193–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baron, J., & Spranca, M. (1997). Protected values. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 70, 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartels, D. M. (2008). Principled moral sentiment and the flexibility ol moral judgment and decision making. Cognition, 108(2), 381–417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Batson, C. D., Polycarpou, M. P., Harmon-Jones, E., Imholl, H., Mitchener, E. C, Bednar, L. L., Klein, T. R., & Highberger, L. (1997). Empathy and attitudes: Can feeling for a member of a stigmatized group improve feelings toward the group? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 105–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumeister, R. R, & Vohs, K. D. (2004). Four roots of evil. In A. G. Miller (ed.), The Social Psychology of Good and Evil (pp. 85–101). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Ze’ev, A. (2000). The Subtlety of Emotions. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Betancourt, H., Hardin, C, & Manzi, I. J. (1992). Beliefs, value orientation, and culture in attribution processes and helping behavior. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 23, 179–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blasi, A. (1999). Emotions and moral motivation. Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior, 29, 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blum, L. (1994). Moral Perception and Particularity. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (2009[1908]). Ethics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenberg, N. (2000). Emotion, regulation, and moral development. Annual Review of Psychology, 51, 665–697.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fesmire, S. (2003). John Dewey and the Moral Imagination: Pragmatism in Ethics. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frankfurt, H. (1993). What we are morally responsible for. In J. M. Fischer & M. Ravizza (eds.), Perspectives on Moral Responsibility (pp. 286–294). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fredrickson, B. L., & Branigan, C. (2005). Positive emotions broaden the scope of attention and thought-action repertoires. Cognition & Emotion, 29(3), 313–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frimer, J. A., Walker, L. J., Dunlop, W. L., Lee, B. H., & Riches, A. (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  • The integration of agency and communion in moral personality: Evidence of enlightened self-interest. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 149–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbs, J. C. (2003). Moral Development and Reality: Beyond the Theories of Kohlberg and Hoffman. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gino, R, & Ariely, D. (2012). The dark side of creativity: Original thinkers can be more dishonest. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102, 445–459.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gollwitzer, P. M., & Sheeran, P. (2006). Implementation intentions and goal achievement: A meta-analysis of effects and processes. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 69–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenspan, S. I., & Shanker, S. I. (2004). The Pirstldea. Cambridge, MA: Da Capo Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hadot, P. (2011). The Present Alone Is Our Happiness (M. Djaballah & M. Chase, trans.). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haidt, J. (2001). The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychological Review, 108, 814–834.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haidt, J. (2007). The new synthesis in moral psychology. Science, 316, 998–1002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heath, C, & Heath, D. (2010). Switch: How to Change Things When Change Is Hard. New York: Broadway Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogarth, R. M. (2001). Educating Intuition. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hume, D. (1969[1739/1740]). A Treatise of Human Nature. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Isen, A. M., & Daubman, K. A. (1984). The influence of affect on categorization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47(6), 1206.

    Google Scholar 

  • John-Steiner, V. (2000). Creative Collaboration. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, M. (1993). Moral Imagination. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, I. (1949). Pundamental Principles of the Metaphysics of Morals. New York: Liberal Arts Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klinger, E. (1978). Modes of normal conscious flow. In K. S. Pope & J. L. Singer (eds.), The Stream of Consciousness: Scientific Investigations into the Plow of Human Experience (pp. 225–258). New York: Plenum.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Loewenstein, G., & Small, D. (2007). The scarecrow and the tin man: The vicissitudes of human sympathy and caring. Review of General Psychology, 11, 112–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lupien, S. J., McEwen, B. S., Gunnar, M. R., & Heim, C. (2009). Effects of stress throughout the lifespan on the brain, behaviour and cognition. Nature Reviews Neurosciences, 10, 434–445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacLean, P. D. (1990). The Triune Brain in Evolution: Role in Paleocerebral Punctions. New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGilchrist, I. (2009). The Master and His Emissary: The Divided Brain and the Making of the Western World. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meaney, M. (2010). Epigenetics and the biological définition of gene x environment interactions. Child Development, 81(1), 41–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monin, B., Pizarro, D., & Beer, J. (2007). Emotion and reason in moral judgment: Different prototypes lead to different theories. In K. D. Vohs, R. R Baumeister, & G. Loewenstein (eds.), Do Emotions Help or Hurt Decision Making? New York: Russell Sage Foundation Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mrkva, K., & Narvaez, D. (in press). Moral psychology and the” cultural other”: Cultivating an openness to experience and the new. In B. Zizek & A. Escher (eds.), Ways of Approaching the Strange. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murdoch, I. (1989[1970]). The Sovereignty of Good. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Narvaez, D. (2006). Integrative ethical education. In M. Killen & J. Smetana (eds.), Handbook of Moral Development (pp. 703–733). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Narvaez, D. (2008). Triune ethics: The neurobiological roots of our multiple moralities. New Ideas in Psychology 26, 95–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Narvaez, D. (2010). Moral complexity: The fatal attraction of truthiness and the importance of mature moral functioning. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5, 163–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Narvaez, D. (2012). Moral neuroeducation from early life through the lifespan. Neuroethics, 5(2), 145–157. doi:10.1007/sl2152–011-9117-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Narvaez, D. (2013a). Development and socialization within an evolutionary context: Growing up to become” A good and useful human being.” In D. Fry (ed.), War, Peace and Human Nature: The Convergence of Evolutionary and Cultural Views (pp. 643–672). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Narvaez, D. (2013b). Neurobiology and moral mindsets. In K. Heinrichs & F. Oser (eds.), Moral and Immoral Behavior: Theoretical and Empirical Perspectives on Moral Motivation (pp. 289–307). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Narvaez, D. (2014). The Neurobiology and Development of Human Morality: Evolution, Culture and Wisdom. New York: W.W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Narvaez, D., & Gleason, T. (2013). Developmental optimization. In D. Narvaez, J. Panksepp, A. Schore, & T. Gleason (eds.), Evolution, Early Experience and Human Development: Prom Research to Practice and Policy (pp. 307–325). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Narvaez, D. & Lapsley, D. K. (2005). The psychological foundations of everyday morality and moral expertise. In D. Lapsley & C. Power (eds.), Character Psychology and Character Education (pp. 140–165). Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Narvaez, D., & Rest, J. (1995). The four components of acting morally. In W. Kurtines & J. Gewirtz (eds.), Moral Behavior and Moral Development: An Introduction (pp. 385–400). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Narvaez, D., & Vaydich, J. (2008). Moral development and behavior under the spotlight of the neurobiological sciences. Journal of Moral Education, 37, 289–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Narvaez, D., Brooks, J., & Mattan, B. (2011). Triune ethics moral identities are shaped by attachment, personality factors and influence moral behavior. Annual meeting of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, San Antonio.

    Google Scholar 

  • Narvaez, D., Hardy, S., & Brooks, J. (2014). A multidimensional approach to moral identity: Early life experience, prosocial personality, and moral outcomes. Manuscript submitted for publication.

    Google Scholar 

  • Narvaez, D., Panksepp, J., Schore, A., & Gleason, T. (eds.) (2013). Evolution, Early Experience and Human Development: Prom Research to Practice and Policy. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Narvaez, D., Wang, L., Gleason, T., Cheng, A., Lefever, J., & Deng, L. (2013). The evolved developmental niche and sociomoral outcomes in Chinese three-year-olds. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 10(2), 106–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Panksepp, J. (1998). Affective Neuroscience. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pizarro, D. (2000). Nothing more than feelings? The role ol emotions in moral judgment. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 30, 355–455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pizarro, D., Detweiler-Bedell, B., & Bloom, P. (2006). The creativity ol everyday reasoning: Empathy, disgust and moral persuasion. In J. Kaulman & J. Baer (eds.), Creativity and Reason in Cognitive Development, (pp. 81–98). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi, M. (1958). Personal Knowledge: Towards a Post-Critical Philosophy. Chicago, IL: University ol Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porges, S. W. (2011). The Polyvagal Theory: Neurophysiologial Toundations of Emotions, Attachment, Communication, Self-Regulation. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ray, P. H., & Anderson, S. R. (2000). The Cultural Créatives: How 50 Million People Are Changing the World. New York: Harmony Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reid, S. (1999). Autism and trauma. Autistic post-traumatic developmental disorder. In A. Alvarez & S. Reid (eds.), Autism and Personality. Pindings from the Tavistock Autism Workshop (pp. 93–109). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rest, J. (1983). Morality. In P. H. Müssen (series ed.) & J. Flavell & E. Markman (vol. eds.), Handbook of Child Psychology: Vol. 3, Cognitive Development (4th edn., pp. 556–629). New York: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rest, J. R. (1986). Moral Development: Advances in Research and Theory. New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rest, J., Narvaez, D., Bebeau, M. J., & Thoma, S. J. (1999). Postconventional Moral Thinking: A Neo-Kohlbergian Approach. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sapolsky, R. (2004). Why Zebras Don’t Get Ulcers, 3rd edn. New York: Holt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schore, A. N. (1994). Affect Regulation and the Origin of the Self. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schore, A. (2003a). Affect Regulation and the Repair of the Self. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schore, A. (2003b). Affect Dysregulation and Disorders of the Self. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shelley, P. B. (1821). A Defence of Poetry. Downloaded on September 16, 2012 from http://www.bartleby.com/27/23.html.

  • Shonkoff, J. P., & Garner, A. S., The Committee on Psychosocial Childhood, Adoption, and Dependent Care, and Section on Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics, Siegel, B. S., Dobbins, M. I., Earls, M. R, Garner, A. S., McGuinn, L., Pascoe, D., & Wood, D. L. (2012). The lifelong effects ol early childhood adversity and toxic stress. Pediatrics, 129, e232. doi: 10.1542/peds.2011-2663.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegel, D. J. (1999). The Developing Mind: How Relationships and the Brain Interact to Shape Who We Are. New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slade, A. (1987). The quality ol attachment and symbolic play. Developmental Psychology, 23, 78–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slade, A. (1994). Making meaning and making believe: Their role in the clinical process. In A. Slade & D. Woll (eds.), Children at Play: Clinical and Developmental Approaches to Meaning and Representation (pp. 81–110). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slovic, P., Finucane, M., Peters, E., & MacGregor, D. G. (2002). Rational actors or rational fools: Implications of the affect heuristic for behavioral economics. Journal of Socioeconomics, 31(4), 329–342.

    Google Scholar 

  • Somerville, M. (2006). The Ethical Imagination: Journeys of the Human Spirit. Toronto: House of Anansi Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. J. (ed.). (1999). Handbook of Creativity. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tegano, D. W. (1990). Relationship of tolerance of ambiguity and playfulness to creativity. Psychological Reports, 66(3), 1047–1056.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tetlock, P. E. (2005). Expert Political Judgment: How Good Is It? How Can We Know? Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trevarthen, C. (2005). Action and emotion in development of the human self, its sociability and cultural intelligence: Why infants have feelings like ours. In J. Nadel & D. Muir (eds.), Emotional Development (pp. 61–91). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trevathan, W. R. (2011). Human Birth: An Evolutionary Perspective, 2nd edn. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trout, J. D. (2009). The Empathy Gap. New York: Viking/Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wainryb, C., & Pasupathi, M. (2010). Political violence and disruptions in the development of moral agency. Child Development Perspectives, 4, 48–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, J. D. (1988). Moral Relevance and Moral Conflict. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, J. Q. (1993). The Moral Sense. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yurtsever, G. (2000). Ethical beliefs and tolerance of ambiguity. Social Behavior and Personality, 28(2), 141–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2014 Darcia Narvaez and Kellen Mrkva

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Narvaez, D., Mrkva, K. (2014). The Development of Moral Imagination. In: Moran, S., Cropley, D., Kaufman, J.C. (eds) The Ethics of Creativity. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137333544_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics