Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Turn of the Tide—New Horizons in German Education Policymaking through IO Influence

  • Chapter
Transformation of Education Policy

Part of the book series: Transformations of the State ((TRST))

Abstract

The recent years of German education policymaking have been characterized by immense changes and continuing reform dynamics. Particularly in comparison to previous decades, which were a period of stagnation and marginal adjustments, far-reaching reforms in both secondary and higher education have taken place since the late 1990s. However, national factors did not provide the main impulse for this rediscovery of education policy. First and foremost, initiatives on the international level promoted by international organizations (IOs) were responsible for putting issues of education back on the agenda. In secondary education, the Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA), as carried out by the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), influenced themes and debates in matters of education policy (Jakobi and Martens 2007; Martens 2007). PISA revealed the mediocrity of Germany’s education system compared to other industrialized countries in late 2001 and triggered an intensive discourse about improving secondary education. It became obvious that reforms to modernize the German school system were inevitable. For higher education, efforts at the European level to create a common university sector undertaken under the label “Bologna Process” gradually became linked to the European Union (EU)1 and stimulated an ongoing process of reorganization of the German system (Hahn 2004).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Ammermüller, Andreas (2004) “PISA: What Makes the Difference?” Diskussionspapiere der DFG-Forschergruppe 04/07, 1–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balzer, Carolin and Alessandra Rusconi (2007) “From the European Commission to the Member States and Back—a Comparison of the Bologna and the Copenhagen Process,” in K. Martens, A. Rusconi, and K. Leuze, eds., New Areas of Education Governance. The Impact of International Organizations and Markets on Educational Policy Making, Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave, 57–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumert, Jürgen, Cordula Artelt, Eckhardt Klieme, Michael Neubrand, Manfred Prenzel, Ulrich Schiefele, W. Schmieder, K.-J. Tilmann, and M. Weiß (2003) Pisa 2000—Ein differenzierter Blick auf die Länder der Bundesrepublik Deutschland, Opladen: Leske + Budrich.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Baumert, Jürgen, Petra Stanat, and Anke Demmrich (2001) “PISA 2000: Untersuchungsgegenstand, theoretische Grundlagen und Durchführung der Studie,” in Deutsches PISA-Konsortium, ed., PISA 2000—Basiskompetenzen von Schülerinnen und Schülern im internationalen Vergleich, Opladen: Leske + Budrich, 15–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • BMBF (2008) Bericht zur Umsetzung des Bologna-Prozesses in Deutschland (Online: http://www.bmbf.de/pub/umsetzung_bologna_prozess_2007_09.pdf, last access: June 15, 2009).

    Google Scholar 

  • Carey, David (2008) “Improving Education Outcomes in Germany,” OECD Economics Department Working Papers, 611.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • EQAR, European Quality Assurance Register (2009) European Quality Assurance Register—EQAR (Online: http://www.eqar.eu/uploads/media/EQAR_Infodoc. pdf, last access: May 17, 2009).

    Google Scholar 

  • Erk, Jan (2003) “Federal Germany and Its Non-Federal Society: Emergence of an All-German Educational Policy in a System of Exclusive Provincial Jurisdiction,” Canadian Journal of Political Science 36 (2), 295–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ertl, Hubert (2006) “Educational Standards and the Changing Discourses on Education: The Reception and Consequences of the PISA Study in Germany,” Oxford Review of Education 32 (5), 619–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ertl, Hubert and David Phillips (2000) “The Enduring Nature of the Tripartite System of Secondary Schooling in Germany: Some Explanations,” British Journal of Educational Studies 48 (4), 391–412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Führ, Christoph (1997) Deutsches Bildungswesen seit 1945, Kriftel, Neuwied: Luchterhand.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gehrmann, Axel, Peter Massing, Einhard Rau, and Bernhard Muszynski (2003) Bildungspolitik in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland—Eine Einführung, Schwalbach, Taunus: Wochenschau Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hahn, Karola (2004) Die Internationalisierung der deutschen Hochschulen. Kontext, Kernprozesse, Konzepte und Strategien, Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hartmann, Michael (2006) “Die Exzellenzinitiative—ein Paradigmenwechsel in der deutschen Hochschulpolitik,” Leviathan 34 (4), 447–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heichel, Stephan, Katharina Holzinger, Thomas Sommerer, Duncan Liefferink, Jessica Pape, and Sietske Veenman (2008) “Research Design, Variables and Data,” in K. Holzinger, C. Knill, and B. Arts, eds., Environmental Policy Convergence in Europe—the Impact of International Institutions and Trade, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 64–97.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • IQB, Institut zur Qualitätsentwicklung im Bildungswesen (2009) Perspectives and Visions. The Standardization and Illustration of National Educational Standards in the Federal States of Germany. Introducing the IQB (Online: http://www.iqb.huberlin.de/institut, last access: February 22, 2009).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jakobi, Anja P. and Kerstin Martens (2007) “Diffusion durch internationale Organisationen: Die Bildungspolitik der OECD,” in K. Holzinger, H. Jörgens, and C. Knill, eds., Politische Vierteljahresschrift—Special Issue: Transfer, Diffusion und Konvergenz von Politiken, 247–70.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Katzenstein, Peter (1987) Policy and Politics in West Germany. The Growth of a Semisouvereign State, Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiper, Hanna and Ulrich Kattmann (2003) “Basiskompetenzen im Vergleich— Überblick über Ergebnisse der PISA-Studie 2000,” in B. Moschner, H. Kiper, and U. Kattmann, eds., PISA 2000 als Herausforderung, Baltmannweiler: Schneider Verlag Hohengehren, 15–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • KMK (2001) Strukturvorgaben für die Einführung von Bachelor-/Bakkalaureus und Master-/Magisterstudiengängen (Online: http://www.hrk.de/de/download/ dateien/strukvor.pdf, last access: October 15, 2008).

    Google Scholar 

  • KMK (2008) The Education System of the Federal Republic of Germany 2006. A Description of the Responsibilities, Structures and Developments in Education Policy for the Exchange ofInformation in Europe (edited by B. Lohmar and T. Eckhardt), Bonn: KMK.

    Google Scholar 

  • KMK and BMBF (2008) Ergebnisse von PIRLS/IGLU 2006-I und PISA-I: Gemeinsame Empfehlungen der Kultusministerkonferenz und des Bundesministeriums für Bildung und Forschung (Online: http://www.kmk.org/fileadmin/pdf/dokumentation/ BeschlKMK/Vereinbarungen__Erklaerungen/080306-pisa.pdf, last access: May 28, 2009).

    Google Scholar 

  • Krücken, Boris (2005) “Hochschulen im Wettbewerb—Eine Untersuchung am Beispiel der Einführung von Bachelor- und Masterstudiengängen an deutschen Universitäten,” Endbericht des Lehrforschungsprojekt, 1–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Künzel, Klaus (1982) “The State and Higher Education in the Federal Republic of Germany,” European Journal of Education 17 (3), 243–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loeber, Heinz-Dieter and Wolf-Dieter Scholz (2003) “Von der Bildungskatastrophe zum Bildungsschock—Zur Kontinuität sozialer Benachteiligung durch das deutsche Bildungssystem,” in B. Moschner, H. Kiper, and U. Kattmann, eds., PISA 2000 als Herausforderung, Baltmannsweiler: Schneider Verlag Hohengehren, 241–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maassen, Oliver T. (2004) DieBologna-Revolution: Auswirkungen derHochschulreform in Deutschland, Frankfurt am Main: Bankakad.-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martens, Kerstin (2007) “How to Become an Influential Actor—the‘Comparative Turn’ in OECD Education Policy,” in K. Martens, A. Rusconi, and K. Leuze, eds., New Areas of Education Governance. The Impact of International Organizations and Markets on Educational Policy Making, Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave, 40–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martens, Kerstin and Dennis Niemann (2009) “Governance by Comparison— How Ratings & Rankings Can Impact National Policy Making in Education,” paper presented at the Conference “International Studies Association,” New York City, New York, February 15–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Massing, Peter (2003) “Konjunkturen und Institutionen der Bildungspolitik,” in P. Massing, Bildungspolitik in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland, Schwalbach: Wochenschau Verlag, 9–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, Karl Ulrich (2005) “Das Hochschulwesen,” in K.S. Cortina, J. Baumert, A. Leschinsky, K.U. Mayer, and L. Trommer, eds., Das Bildungswesen in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland. Strukturen und Entwicklungen im Überblick, Reinbek: Rowohlt Taschenbuch Verlag, 581–624.

    Google Scholar 

  • MIWFT—Ministerium für Innovation, Wissenschaft, Forschung und Technologie des Landes Nordrhein-Westfalen (2007) Ziel- und Leistungsvereinbarungen 2007–2010. Hochschulen in Nordrhein-Westfalen (Online: http://www.innovation.nrw.de/obj ekt-pool/download_dateien/hochschulen_und_forschung/Broschuere_ ZLV_2007.pdf, last access: May 25, 2009).

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller-Böling, Detlef (2000) Die entfesselte Hochschule, Bertelsmann Stiftung: Bertelsmann Stiftung.

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller-Böling, Detlef (2006) Nach der Reform ist vor der Reform. Neue Herausforderungen für die entfesselte Hochschule, Cologne: Josef Eul Verlag GmbH.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mushaben, Joyce Marie (1984) “Reform in Three Phases: Judicial Action and the German Federal Framework Law for Higher Education of 1976,” Higher Education 13 (4), 423–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nieke, Wolfgang (2003) “Schulreform: Wie reagiert die Fachpolitik auf bildungswissenschaftliche Bestandsaufnahmen?” in T. Hansel, ed., PISA—und die Folgen? Die Wirkung von Leistungsvergleichsstudien in der Schule, Herbolzheim: Centaurus Verlag, 197–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Picht, Georg (1964) Die deutsche Bildungskatastrophe. Analyse und Dokumentation, Munich: Walter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prenzel, Manfred (2007) “PISA 2006: Die wichtigsten Ergebnisse im Überblick,” in M. Prenzel, C. Artelt, J. Baumert, W. Blum, M. Hammann, E. Klieme, and R. Pekrun, PISA 2006. Die Ergebnisse der internationalen Vergleichsstudie, Münster, Munich: Waxmann, 13–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prenzel, Manfred, Jürgen Baumert, Werner Blum, Rainer Lehmann, Detlev Leutner, Michael Neubrand, Reinhard Pekrun, Jürgen Rost, and Ulrich Schiefele (2005) PISA 2003. Der zweite Vergleich der Länder in Deutschland—Was wissen und können Jugendliche?, Münster, New York, Munich, Berlin: Waxmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pritchard, Rosalind (2006) “Trends in the Restructuring of German Universities,” Comparative Education Review 50 (1), 90–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reinalda, Bob (2008) “The Bologna Process and Its Achievements in Europe 1999–2007,” Journal of Political Science Education 4 (4), 463–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rürup, Matthias (2007) Innovationswege im deutschen Bildungssystem. Die Verbreitung der Idee “Schulautonomie” im Ländervergleich, Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schramm, Jürgen (1980) “Development of Higher Education and Employment in the Federal Republic of Germany,” Higher Education 9 (5), 605–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • STMWFK—Bayerisches Staatsministerium für Wissenschaft, Forschung und Kunst (2005) Gemeinsamer Leitfaden für den Abschluss von Zielvereinbarungen zwischen den Bayerischen Universitäten und dem Staatsministerium für Wissenschaft, Forschung und Kunst, Munich: STMWFK.

    Google Scholar 

  • STMWFK—Bayerisches Staatsministerium für Wissenschaft, Forschung und Kunst (2006) Neues Hochschulrecht in Bayern (Online: http://www.stmwfk. bayern.de/Hochschule/pdf/themenblaetter_hochschulrecht.pdf, last access: May 25, 2009).

    Google Scholar 

  • Teichler, Ulrich (2005) Hochschulstrukturen im Umbruch. Eine Bilanz der Reformdynamik seit vier Jahrzehnten, Frankfurt, New York: Campus Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilde, Stephanie (2002) “Secondary Education in Germany 1990–2000: ‘One Decade of Non-Reform in Unified German Education’?” Oxford Review of Education 28 (1), 39–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wößmann, Ludger (2002) Schooling and the Quality of Human Capital, Berlin: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Dennis Niemann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. University of Bremen, Germany

    Kerstin Martens (Associate Professor of International Relations) (Associate Professor of International Relations)

  2. Ruhr-University, Bochum, Germany

    Alexander-Kenneth Nagel (Assistant Professor of Sociology of Religion) (Assistant Professor of Sociology of Religion)

  3. Department of Social Sciences, University of Bremen, Germany

    Michael Windzio (Professor of Sociology) & Ansgar Weymann (Professor of Sociology) (Professor of Sociology) &  (Professor of Sociology)

Copyright information

© 2010 Dennis Niemann

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Niemann, D. (2010). Turn of the Tide—New Horizons in German Education Policymaking through IO Influence. In: Martens, K., Nagel, AK., Windzio, M., Weymann, A. (eds) Transformation of Education Policy. Transformations of the State. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230281295_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation