Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Impact of Indigenous Chinese Management Concepts on Leadership Practices

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Palgrave Handbook of Leadership in Transforming Asia

  • 1639 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter explores the impact of Confucian values and Maoist thoughts on modern Chinese business leaders. Additionally, 142 Chinese managers’ leadership styles are reconciled with traditional Western-based theoretical leadership constructs. By conducting an in-depth content analysis, an almost equal distribution of Confucian and Maoist influence, a third hybrid leadership form, and two distinct patterns can be revealed. While Confucian leaders pursue either ethical or empowering leadership practices, follow Maoist leaders either transactional or transformational leadership styles. The application of a more context-specific and emic approach enables the detection of China-specifics as well as the provision of their causes. By analyzing the impact of both cultural and political dimensions simultaneously, this study enhances the understanding of the interactions between institutions and individuals and makes thereto related suggestions for future research. An important theoretical implication lies in showing why existing theoretical perspectives need modifications to account for emerging market phenomena. An important practical implication is the evidence that in China today both Confucian values and Maoist dialectics coexist.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ahlstrom, D., Chen, S., & Yeh, K. (2012). Managing in ethnic Chinese communities: Culture, institutions, and context. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 27(3), 341–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Antonakis, J., Avolio, B., & Sivasubbramaniam, N. (2003). Context and leadership: An examination of the nine-factor full-range leadership theory using the Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire. The Leadership Quarterly, 14, 261–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aquino, K., & Reed, A. (2002). The self-importance of moral identity. Journal Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 1423–1440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arnold, J., Arad, S., Rhoades, J., & Drasgow, F. (2000). The empowering leadership questionnaire. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 21, 249–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Avolio, B., & Bass, B. M. (1991). The full-range leadership development programs. Binghamton, NY: Bass, Avolio.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bass, B. M., & Avolio, B. J. (1997). Full range leadership development: Manual for the multifactor leadership questionnaire. Palo Alto, CA: Mindergarden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, D. (2008). China’s new Confucianism: Politics and everyday life in a changing society. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennis, W., & Nanus, B. (1985). Leadership. New York, NY: Harper &Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bond, M., & Hwang, K. (1986). The social psychology of Chinese people. In M. Bond (Ed.), The psychology of the Chinese people. Hong Kong: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, M., & Trevino, L. (2006). Ethical leadership. Leadership Quarterly, 17, 595–616.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, M., Trevino, L., & Harrison, D. (2005). Ethical leadership. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 97, 117–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burns, J. (1978). Leadership. New York, NY: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bycio, P., Hackett, R., & Allen, J. (1995). Further assessments of Bass’ conceptualization of transactional and transformational leadership. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80, 468–478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chai, S., & Rhee, M. (2010). Confucian capitalism and the paradox of closure and structural holes in East Asian Firms. Management and Organization Review, 6(1), 5–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, G., Sharma, P., Edinger, S., Shapiro, D., & Farh, J. (2011). Motivating and demotivating forces in teams: Cross-level influences of empowering leadership and relationship conflict. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(3), 541–557.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, M. J. (2002). Transcending paradox: The Chinese ‘middle way’ perspective. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 19, 179–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, S., Chang, L., & Ledford, G. (1997). A hierarchical construct of self-management leadership and its relationship to quality of work life and perceived work group effectiveness. Personnel Psychology, 50, 275–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conger, J. (1989). Leadership: The art of empowering others. Academy of Management Executive, 3(1), 17–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deng, G., & Kennedy, S. (2010). Big business and Industry association lobbying in China: The paradox of contrasting styles. The China Journal, 63, 101–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Detert, J., Trevino, L., Burris, E., & Andiappen, M. (2007). Managerial models of influence and counterproductivity in organizations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 993–1005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erhart, M. G. (2004). Leadership and procedural justice climate as antecedents of unit-level organizational citizenship behavior. Personnel Psychology, 57, 61–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fairbank, J, & Reischauer, E. (1973). China: Tradition and transformation. New York, NY: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fang, T. (2003). A critique of Hofstede’s fifth national culture dimension. International Journal of Cross Cultural Management, 3(3), 347–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faure, G. O., & Fang, T. (2008). Changing Chinese values: Keeping up with paradoxes. International Business Review, 17, 94–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fereday, J., & Muir-Cochrane, E. (2006). Demonstrating rigor using thematic analysis: A hybrid approach of inductive and deductive coding and theme development. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 5(1), 80–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fu, P., Wu., R., Yang, Y., & Ye, J. (2007). Chinese culture and leadership. In J. Chokar (Ed.), Culture and leadership across the world. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin, V, Wofford, J., & Whittington, J. (2001). A theoretical and empirical extension to the transformational leadership construct. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22, 759–774.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hater, J., & Bass, B. M. (1988). Superiors’ evaluations and subordinates’ perceptions of transformational and transactional leadership. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73, 695–702.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holtbrügge, D. (2013). Indigenous management research. Management International Review, 53, 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holtbrügge, D., & Garg, R. (2016). Indigenous Indian management philosophies. Key concepts and relevance for modern Indian firms. In A. Malik & V. Pereira (Ed.), Indian culture and work organisations in transition. India. (in press): Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang, X. (2008). Motivation and job satisfaction across cultures: How much do we really know? In P. Smith, M. Peterson, & D. Thomas (Eds.), Handbook of cross-cultural management research. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, J. (1999). Transformational/charismatic leadership’s transformation of the field. The Leadership Quarterly, 10, 129–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joseph, W. (2010). Politics in China: An introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirkman, B., Chen, G., Farh, J., Chen, Z., & Lowe, K. (2009). Individual power distance orientation and follower reactions to transformational leaders: A cross-level, cross-cultural examination. Academy of Management Journal, 52(4), 744–764.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lam, L., Huang, X., & Lau, D. (2012). Leadership research in Asia: Taking the road less traveled? Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 29, 195–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lapsley, D., & Lasky, B. (2001). Prototypic moral character. Identity, 1, 345–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawler, E. E. (1992). The ultimate advantage: Creating high-involvement organizations. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • LePine, J., Piccolo, R., Jackson, C., Mathieu, J., & Saul, J. (2008). A meta-analysis of teamwork processes. Personnel Psychology, 61, 273–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leung, K. (2012). Indigenous Chinese management research: Like it or not, we need it. Management and Organization Review, 8(1), 1–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, C. (2008). The philosophy of harmony in classical Confucianism. Philosophy Compass, 3(3), 423–435.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, P. (2012). Toward an integrative framework of indigenous research: The geocentric implications of Yin-Yang Balance. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 29, 849–872.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, S., & Yeh, K. (2007). Mao’s pervasive influence on Chinese CEOs. Harvard Business Review, 85(12), 16–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liden, R. (2012). Leadership research in Asia: A brief assessment and suggestions for the future. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 29, 205–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liden, R., & Tewksbury, T. (1995). Empowerment and work teams. In G. Reffis (Ed.), Handbook of human resource management. Cambridge, Mass: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, C. (2010). Studying Chinese culture and conflict: A research agenda. International Journal of Conflict Management, 21(1), 70–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, L., & Ho, Y. (2009). Confucian dynamism, culture and ethical changes in Chinese societies-a comparative study of China, Taiwan, and Hong Kong. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 20(11), 2402–2417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lockett, M. (1988). Culture and the problems of Chinese management. Organization Studies, 9(4), 475–496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lowe, K., Kroeck, K., & Sivasubramaniam, N. (1996). Effectiveness correlates of transformational and transactional leadership. Leadership Quarterly, 7, 385–425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manz, C., & Sims, H. (1987). Leading workers to lead themselves. Administrative Science Quarterly, 32, 106–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsella, A. J. (1998). Toward a ‘global-community psychology’: Meeting the needs of a changing world. American Psychologist, 53(12), 1282–1291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martinsons, M., & Westwood, R. (1997). Management information systems in the Chinese business culture: An explanatory theory. Information & Management, 32(5), 215–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, D., Aquino, K., Greenbaum, R., & Kuenzi, M. (2012). Who displays ethical leadership, and why does it matter? Academy of Management Journal, 55(1), 151–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mays, N., & Pope, C. (1995). Rigour and qualitative research. British Medical Journal, 311, 109–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, P. (2011). Maoism versus Confucianism: Ideological influences on Chinese business leaders. Journal of Management Development, 30(7/8), 632–646.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meisner, M. J. (1986). Mao’s China and after: A history of the People’s Republic. New York: Free.

    Google Scholar 

  • Melvin, S. (2007). The little red book of China business. Naperville, IL: Sourcebooks.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, K. E. (2006). Asian management research needs more self-confidence. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 23, 119–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, P. (2011). Maoism versus Confucianism: Ideological influences on Chinese business leaders. Journal of Management Development, 30(7/8), 632–646.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pan, Y., Rowney, J., & Peterson, M. (2011). The structure of Chinese cultural traditions: An empirical study of business employees in China. Management and Organization Review, 8(1), 77–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peng, M. W. (2012). The global strategy of emerging multinationals from China. Global Strategy Journal, 2, 97–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Podsakoff, P., Todor, W., & Skov, R. (1982). Effect of Leader contingent and non-contingent reward and punishment behaviors on subordinate performance and satisfaction. Academy of Management Journal, 25, 810–821.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodsutti, M., & Swierczek, F. (2002). Leadership and organizational effectiveness in multinational enterprises in southeast Asia. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 23(5), 250–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roth, K. (1995). Managing international interdependence: CEO characteristics in a resource-based framework. Academy of Management Journal, 38(1), 200–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rugman, A. M., & Li, J. (2007). Will China’s multinationals succeed globally of regionally? European Management Journal, 25(5), 333–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shamir, B., House, R., & Arthur, M. (1993). The motivational effects of charismatic leadership. Organizational Science, 4, 577–594.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slote, W., & De Vos, G. (1998). Confucianism and the family. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, D. H. (1973). Confucius. London: Maurice Temple Smith.

    Google Scholar 

  • Srivastava, A., & Bartol, K. (2006). Empowering leadership in management teams: Effects on knowledge sharing, efficacy, and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 49(6), 1239–1251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stemler, S. (2001). An overview of content analysis. Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation, 7(17), 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, A. B. (1988). Does leadership make a difference to organizational performance? Administrative Science Quarterly, 33(22), 401–417.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsui, A. S. (2004). Contributing to global management knowledge: A case for high quality indigenous research. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 21, 491–513.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Venkataraman, S., & Van de Ven, A. (1998). Hostile environmental jolts, transaction sets and new business development. Journal of Business Venturing, 13(3), 231–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walton, R., & Hackman, J. (1986). Groups under contrasting management strategies. In P. Goodman (Ed.), Designing effective work groups. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walumbwa, F., Mayer. D., Wang, P., Wang, H., Workman, K., & Christensen, A. (2011). Linking ethical leadership to employee performance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 115, 204–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, X., & Howell, J. (2010). Exploring the dual-level effects of transformational leadership on followers. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95, 1134–1144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warner, M. (2009). Making sense of HRM in China: Setting the scene. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 20(11), 2169–2193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, J. (1975). Understanding Maoism: A Chinese philosopher’s critique. Studies in Soviet Thought, 15(2), 99–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, S., & Stening, B. W. (2013). Mao meets the market. Reconciling ideology and pragmatism in China. Management International Review, 53, 419–448.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, W., & Alon, I. (2009). Biographical dictionary of New Chinese entrepreneurs and business leaders. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, Y., Harwood, J., & Hummert, M. (2005). Perceptions of conflict management styles in Chinese intergenerational dyads. Communication Monographs, 72(1), 71–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zheng, Y. (1997). The compilation of three religions: Confucianism, Taoism and Buddhism. Zhen Yishan: Taipei.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of International Management, Friedrich-Alexander-University, Erlangen-Nürnberg, Germany

    Sue Claire Berning

Authors
  1. Sue Claire Berning
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sue Claire Berning .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. School of Management, Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

    Nuttawuth Muenjohn

  2. School of Management, Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

    Adela McMurray

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Berning, S.C. (2017). Impact of Indigenous Chinese Management Concepts on Leadership Practices. In: Muenjohn, N., McMurray, A. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Leadership in Transforming Asia. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-57940-9_25

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation