Abstract
The multistrategy learning system WHY is used as a testbed for investigating a computational cognitive model of conceptual change in children learning elementary physics'. Goal of the simulation is to support the cognitive scientist's investigation of learning in humans.
The student's mental model is manually inferred by the cognitive scientist, and by interacting with WHY, from a sequence of interviews collected along a period of eleven teaching sessions. The hypothesized cognitive models are based on a theory of conceptual change, derived from psychology results and educational experiences, which accounts for the evolution of the student's knowledge over a learning period.
The multistrategy learning system WHY, able to handle domain knowledge (including a causal model of the domain), has been chosen as tool for the interactive simulation of the cognitive models evolution. The system is able to model both the answers and the causal explanations given by the children. An example of modelisation of an observed conceptual change is provided.
This work has been performed within the project “Learning in Humans and Machines”, supported by the European Science Foundation
Chapter PDF
References
Baffes P. T. and Mooney R. J. (1996). “A Novel Application of Theory Refinement to Student Modelling”. Proc. of Thirteenth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (Portland, OR), pp. 403–408.
Caravita S. and Halldén O. (1994). “Re-framing the Problem of Conceptual Change”. Learning and Instruction, 4, 89–111.
Chi M. T. H., Slotta J. D. and de Leeuw N. (1994). “From Things to Processes: A Theory of Conceptual Change for Learning Science Concepts”. Learning and Instruction, 4, 27–43.
diSessa A. (1993). “Toward an Epistemology of Physics”. Cognition and Instruction, 10, 105–225.
Forbus K.D. and Gentner D. (1986). “Learning Physical Domains: Toward a Theoretical Framework”. In R. Michalski, J. Carbonell & T. Mitchell (Eds.), Machine Learning: An Artificial Intelligence Approach, Vol. II, Morgan Kaufmann, Los Altos, CA, pp. 311–348.
Giordana A. and Neri F., Saitta L. and Botta M. (1997). “Integrating Multiple Learning Strategies in First Order Logics”. Machine Learning, 27, 209–240.
Mitchell T., Keller R., Kedar-Cabelli S. (1986). “Explanation Based Generalization”, Machine Learning, 1, 47–80.
Murphy L.G. and Medin D.L. (1985). “The Role of Theories in Conceptual Coherence”. Psychological Review, 92, 289–316.
Neri F., Saitta L. and Tiberghien A. (1997a). “Modelling Physical Knowledge Acquisition in Children with Machine Learning”. Proc. of 19th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, Stanford (CA), Morgan Kaufmann, pp. 566–571.
Newell A. (1990). Unified Theories of Cognition, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
Rumelhart D. E. and Norman D. A. (1977). “Accretion, Tuning and Restructuring: Three modes of Learning”, in Cotton J. W. and Klatzky R. L. (Eds.), Semantic Factors in Cognition, Erlbaum (Hillsdale, NJ).
Sage S. and Langley P. (1983). “Modeling Cognitive Development on the Balance Scale Task”. Proc. 8th Int. Joint Conf. on Artificial Intelligence (Karlsruhe, Germany), pp. 94–96.
Saitta L., Botta M., Neri F. (1993). “Multistrategy Learning and Theory Revision”. Machine Learning, 11, 153–172.
Saitta L., Neri F. and al. (1995). “Knowledge Representation Changes in Humans and Machines”. In P. Reimann and H. Spada (Eds.), Learning in Humans and Machines: Towards an Interdisciplinary Learning Science, Elsevier (Oxford), pp. 109–128.
Saitta L., Neri F. and Tiberghien A. (1997). “World Model Construction in Children during Physics Learning”. Proc. of International Symposium on Methodologies for Intelligent Systems '97 (ISMIS 97), Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence series, Springer Verlag (Berlin, Germany), in press.
Schmidt W.C. and Ling C.X. (1996). “A Decision-Tree Model of Balance Scale Development”. Machine Learning, 24, 203–230.
Shultz T.R., Mareschal D. and Schmidt W. (1994). “Modeling Cognitive Developmmnt on Balance Scale Phenomena”. Machine Learning, 16, 57–86.
Sleeman D., Hirsh H., Ellery I. and Kim I. (1990). “Extending Domain Theories: two case Studies in Student Modeling”. Machine Learning, 5, 11–37.
Tiberghien A. (1989). “Learning and Teaching at Middle School Level of Concepts and Phenomena in Physics. The Case of Temperature”. In H. Mandl, E. de Corte, N. Bennett and H.F. Friedrich (Eds.), Learning and Instruction. European Research in an International Context, Volume 2.1, Pergamon Press, Oxford, UK, pp. 631–648.
Tiberghien A. (1994). “Modelling as a Basis for Analysing Teaching-Learning Situations”. Learning and Situations. 4, 71–87.
Vosniadou S. (1994). “Capturing and Modeling the Process of Conceptual Change”. Learning and Instruction, 4, 45–69.
Vosniadou S. and Brewer W.F. (1994). “Mental Models of the Day/Night Cycle”. Cognitive Science, 18, 123–183.
White R. T. (1994). “Commentary Conceptual and Conceptional Change”. Learning and Instruction, 4, 117–121.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1998 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Neri, F. (1998). Simulating children learning and explaining elementary heat transfer phenomena: A multistrategy system at work. In: Nédellec, C., Rouveirol, C. (eds) Machine Learning: ECML-98. ECML 1998. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1398. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0026674
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0026674
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-64417-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-69781-7
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive