Abstract
For many years, battles raged between those who saw knowledge as perception of a given reality and those who saw it as being constructed through rational activity. More recently, epistemological debates have focused on that activity being essentially individual or social. Initially, the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (PME) was heavily influenced by the idea that mathematical knowledge is constructed by individuals, and particularly by von Glasersfeld’s “radical” constructivism. The social constructivist thesis that mathematics is a social construction challenged this dominant notion, but Steve Lerman critiqued the “shared consciousness” interpretation of social constructivism and articulated the sociocultural idea of the centrality of social interactions. His influence led a strong turn to the social, with a focus on intersubjectivity in mathematical knowledge and mathematics learning. Steve not only challenged individual people’s ideas but also drew PME into a position where sociocultural and other poststructural theories are in regular use.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Backhurst, D. (1991). Consciousness and revolution in Soviet psychology: From the Bolshevics to Evald Illyenkov. Cambridge, UK: University of Cambridge Press.
Bauersfeld, H. (1992). Classroom cultures from a social constructivists’ perspective. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 23, 467–481.
Berlin, I. (1976). Vico and Herder: Two studies in the history of ideas. London: The Hogarth Press.
Bernstein, B. (1990). The structuring of pedagogic discourse. London: Routledge.
Brouwer, L. E. J. (1913). Intuitionism and formalism. Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society, 20, 81–96.
Bruner, J. (1996, September). Celebrating Piaget and Vygotsky: An exercise in dialectic. Plenary address to the conference The Growing Mind, Geneva. Retrieved March 7, 2014, from the UCSC website: people.ucsc.edu/~gwells/Files/Courses…/Bruner_Piaget-Vygotsky.pdf
Bruner, J., & Haste, H. (Eds.). (1987). Making sense: The child’s construction of the world. London: Methuen.
Cobb, P. (1986). Contexts, goals, beliefs, and learning mathematics. For the Learning of Mathematics, 6(2), 2–9.
Cobb, P. (1990). Multiple perspectives. In L. Steffe & T. Wood (Eds.), Transforming children’s mathematics education: International perspectives (pp. 200–215). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Cobb, P. (2000). The importance of a situated view of learning to the design of research and instruction. In J. Boaler (Ed.), Multiple perspectives on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 45–84). Westport: Ablex Publishing.
Cobb, P., Yackel, E., & Wood, T. (1988). Curriculum and teacher development: Psychological and anthropological perspectives. In E. Fennema, T. P. Carpenter, & S. J. Lamon (Eds.), Integrating research on teaching and learning mathematics (pp. 92–131). Madison: Wisconsin Centre for Educational Research.
Cobb, P., Wood, T., & Yackel, E. (1991). A constructivist approach to second grade mathematics. In E. von Glasersfeld (Ed.), Radical constructivism in mathematics education (pp. 157–163, 175–176), Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Confrey, J. (1995). How compatible are radical constructivism, sociocultural approaches and social constructivism? In L. Steffe & J. Gale (Eds.), Constructivism in education (pp. 185–225). Hove: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Daniels, H. (2001). Vygotsky and pedagogy. London: Routledge Falmer.
Davis, P. J., & Hersh, R. (1980). The mathematical experience. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Davis, R. B., Maher, C. A., & Noddings, N. (Eds.). (1990). Constructivist views on the teaching and learning of mathematics. Reston: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Dewey, J. (1916). Democracy and education: An introduction to the philosophy of education. New York: Macmillan. (Original work published 1966)
Ernest, P. (1988/1990). Social constructivism as a philosophy of mathematics: Radical constructivism rehabilitated? Retrieved March 1, 2014, from the University of Exeter website http://people.exeter.ac.uk/PErnest/soccon.htm. (Originally presented as a paper, The Impact of Beliefs on the Teaching of Mathematics, to the 6th International Congress of Mathematical Education, Budapest, Hungary on August 7, 1988 then revised for self-publication in March, 1990 on the university website).
Ernest, P. (1991). The philosophy of mathematics education: Studies in mathematics education. London: Falmer Press.
Ernest, P. (1998). Social constructivism as a philosophy of mathematics. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Ernest, P. (1999). Forms of knowledge in mathematics and mathematics education: Philosophical and rhetorical perspectives. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 38(1–3), 67–83.
Geering, H. (1994). Tomorrow’s God: How we create our worlds. Wellington: Bridget Williams Books.
Greeno, J. G. (1991). Number sense as situated knowing in a conceptual domain. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 22, 170–218.
Greeno, J. G. (1993). For research to reform education and cognitive science. In L. Penner, G. M. Batsche, H. M. Knoff, & D. L. Nelson (Eds.), The challenges in mathematics and science education: Psychology’s response (pp. 153–192). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Greeno, J. G. (1997). Theories and practices of thinking and learning to think (Reforming the third R: Changing the school mathematics curriculum). American Journal of Education, 106(1), 85–124.
Head, H. (1920). Studies in neurology. New York: Oxford University Press.
Hegel, G. (1816/1929, October). Logic/Wissenschaft der Logik. In P. Snyder (1929), Logic, Journal of English and Philosophy, 7–17.
Hoyles, C. (1992). Illuminations and reflections—Teachers, methodologies, and mathematics. In W. Geeslin & K. Graham (Eds.), Proceedings of the 16th PME international conference (Vol. 3, pp. 263–286). Tsukuba: PME.
Kieren, T. E. (2000). Dichotomies or binoculars: Reflections on the papers by Steffe and Thompson and by Lerman. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 31(2), 228–233.
Kilpatrick, J. (1987). What constructivism might be in mathematics education. In Proceedings of the eleventh international conference on the psychology of mathematics education (Vol. 1, pp. 3–27). Montreal: PME.
Kitcher, P. (1983). The nature of mathematical knowledge. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Klein, M. (1998). New knowledge/new teachers/new times: How processes of subjectification undermine the implementation of investigatory approaches to teaching mathematics. In C. Kanes, M. Goos, & E. Warren (Eds.), Teaching mathematics in new times (pp. 295–302). Brisbane: Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia.
Lakatos, I. (1976). Proofs and refutations. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Lakatos, I. (1978). Philosophical papers (Vol. 2). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Lerman, S. (1986). Alternative perspectives on the nature of mathematics and the possible influence on the teaching of mathematics. Unpublished PhD thesis, Kings College, University of London.
Lerman, S. (1989). Constructivism, mathematics and mathematics education. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 20(2), 211–223.
Lerman, S. (1990). Alternative perspectives of the nature of mathematics and their influence on the teaching of mathematics. British Educational Research Journal, 16(1), 53–61.
Lerman, S. (1991). Accounting for accounts of learning mathematics: Reading the ZDP in videos and transcripts. In D. Clarke (Ed.), Perspectives on practice and meaning in mathematics and science classrooms (pp. 53–74). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Lerman, S. (1992a). The position of the individual in radical constructivism: In search of the subject. In J. A. Malone & P. C. S. Taylor (Eds.), Constructivist interpretations of teaching and learning mathematics: Proceedings of topic group 10 at the 7th International Congress on Mathematical Education, held in Quebec, Canada, August 1992 (pp. 105–112). Perth: Curtin University of Technology.
Lerman, S. (1992b). The function of language in radical constructivism: A Vygotskian perspective. In Proceedings of the 16th PME conference, University of New Hampshire, Durham, August 6–11, 1992 (Vol. 2, pp. 40–47). Durham: PME.
Lerman, S. (1994a). Towards a unified space of theory-and-practice in mathematics teaching: A research perspective. In L. Baszini (Ed.), Proceedings of the fifth international conference on systematic co-operation between theory and practice in mathematics education (pp. 133–142). Pavia: Universita degli Studi di Pavia.
Lerman, S. (1994b). Metaphors for mind and metaphors for teaching and learning mathematics. In Proceedings of the 18th international conference for the psychology of mathematics education (pp. 144–151). Lisbon: PME.
Lerman, S. (1996a). Guest editorial. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 31, 1–9.
Lerman, S. (1996b). Intersubjectivity in mathematics learning: A challenge to the radical constructivist paradigm? Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 27(2), 133–150.
Lerman, S. (1998a). A moment in the zoom of a lens: Towards a discursive psychology of mathematics teaching and learning. In A. Olivier & K. Newstead (Eds.), Proceedings of 22nd conference of the international group for the psychology of education (Vol. 1, pp. 66–81). Stellenbosch: International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education.
Lerman, S. (1998b). Research on socio-cultural perspectives of mathematics teaching and learning. In A. Sierpinska & J. Kilpatrick (Eds.), Mathematics education as a research domain: A search for identity (pp. 333–350). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Lerman, S. (2000a). The social turn in mathematics education research. In J. Boaler (Ed.), Multiple perspectives on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 19–44). Westport: Ablex Publishing.
Lerman, S. (2000b). A case of interpretations of social: A response to Steffe and Thompson. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 31(2), 210–227.
Lerman, S. (2001a). Cultural, discursive psychology: A sociocultural approach to studying the teaching and learning of mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 46, 87–113.
Lerman, S. (2001b). A cultural/discursive psychology for mathematics teaching and learning. In B. Atweh, H. Forgasz, & B. Nebres (Eds.), Sociocultural research on mathematics education (pp. 3–18). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Lerman, S. (2001c). A review of research perspectives on mathematics teacher education. In F.-L. Lin & T. J. Cooney (Eds.), Making sense of mathematics teacher education (pp. 32–52). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Lerman, S. (2006a). Theories of mathematics education: Is plurality a problem? ZDM, 38(1), 8–13.
Lerman, S. (2006b). Socio-cultural research in PME. In A. Gutiérrez & P. Boero (Eds.), Handbook of research on the psychology of mathematics education: Past, present and future (pp. 347–366). Rotterdam: Sense.
Lerman, S. (2010). Theories of mathematics education: Is plurality a problem? In G. Kaiser & B. Sriraman (Eds.), Advances in mathematics education (pp. 99–110). Dordrecht: Springer.
Lerman, S., & Dengate, B. (1995). Learning theory in mathematics education: Using the wide angle lens and not just the microscope. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 7(1), 26–36.
Lerman, S., Xu, G., & Tsatsaroni, A. (2002). Developing theories of mathematics education research: The ESM story. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 51(1–2), 23–40.
Locke, J. (1689). Essay on the human understanding. In four books. London: Clarenden.
McRobbie, C., & Tobin, K. (1997). A social constructivist perspective on learning environments. International Journal of Science Education, 19(2), 193–208.
Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, self and society: From the standpoint of a sociologist. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Minick, N. (1987). The development of Vygotsky’s thought: An introduction. In R. W. Rieber & A. S. Carton (Eds.), The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky: Vol. 1: Problems of general psychology (pp. 17–36). New York: Plenum Press.
Newman, F., & Holzman, L. (1993). Lev Vygotsky: Revolutionary scientist. London: Routledge.
Newman, F., & Holzman, L. (1996). Unscientific psychology: A cultural-performatory approach to understanding human life. London: Praeger.
Paivio, A. (1986). Mental representations: A dual coding approach. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Piaget, J. (1926/1950). The psychology of intelligence. New York: Harcourt Brace.
Resnick, L. B. (1993). Shared cognition: Thinking as social practice. In L. B. Resnick, J. M. Levine, & S. D. Teasley (Eds.), Perspectives on socially shared cognition (pp. 1–22). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Salomon, G., & Perkins, D. N. (1998). Individual and social aspects of learning. Review of Research in Education, 23, 1–24.
Solomon, J. (1993). The social construction of children’s scientific knowledge. In P. J. Black & A. M. Lucas (Eds.), Children’s informal ideas in science. London: Routledge.
Steffe, L. P., & Gale, J. (Eds.). (1995). Constructivism in education. Hove: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Steffe, L. P., & Thompson, P. W. (2000). Interaction or intersubjectivity? A reply to Lerman. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 31(2), 191–209.
Tymoczko, T. (Ed.). (1986). New directions in the philosophy of mathematics. Boston: Birkhauser.
van der Merwe, W. L., & Voestermans, J. (1995). Wittgenstein’s legacy and the challenge to psychology. Theory and Psychology, 5(1), 27–48.
Vico, G. (1925/1968). Logic. In The new science of Giambattista Vico (3rd ed. Revised translation of Vico’s Scienza Nuova by T. G. Bergin & M. H. Fisch). Ithaca: Cornell University Press. (Original work published 1825)
Voight, J. (1994). Negotiation of mathematical meaning and learning mathematics. In P. Cobb (Ed.), Learning mathematics: Constructivist and interactionist theories of mathematical development (pp. 171–194). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
von Glasersfeld, E. (1983). Learning as a constructive activity. In J. C. Bergeron & N. Herscovics (Eds.), Proceedings of the 5th Annual Meeting of the North American Group of Psychology in Mathematics Education (Vol. 1, pp. 41–101). Montreal: PME-NA.
von Glasersfeld, E. (1984). An introduction to radical constructivism. In P. Watzlawick (Ed.), The invented reality (pp. 17–40). New York: Norton.
von Glasersfeld, E. (1990). An exposition of constructivism: Why some like it radical. In R. B. Davis, C. A. Maher, & N. Noddings (Eds.), Constructivist views on the teaching and learning of mathematics (JRME, Monograph no. 4, pp. 19–29). Reston: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
von Glasersfeld, E. (1991). Knowing without metaphysics: Aspects of the radical constructivist position. In F. Steier (Ed.), Research and reflexivity (pp. 12–29). London: Sage.
von Glasersfeld, E. (1995). Radical constructivism: A way of knowing and learning. London: Routledge Falmer.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes (from the unpublished notebooks of L. S. Vygotsky, edited and translated by M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scriber, & E. Souberman). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1986). Thought and language (Revised Edition, A. Kozulin [Ed.]). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1987). The development of scientific concepts in childhood. In R. W. Rieber & A. S. Carton (Eds.), & N. Minick (Trans.), The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky (Vol. 1, pp. 167–241). New York: Plenum Press.
Wertsch, J. V. (1985). Culture, communication and cognition: Vygotskian perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wittgenstein, L. (1974). Philosophical grammar. Oxford: Blackwell.
Wittgenstein, L. (1978/1956). Remarks on the foundations of mathematics (revised edition, 1978). Cambridge: MIT Press.
Wood, T. L., & Yackel, E. (1990). The development of collaborative dialogue within small group interactions. In L. P. Steffe & T. Wood (Eds.), Transforming children’s mathematics education (pp. 244–252). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
Yackel, E., & Cobb, P. (1996). Sociomathematical norms, argumentation and autonomy in mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 27, 458–477.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Mousley, J.A. (2015). Knowledge Construction: Individual or Social?. In: Gates, P., Jorgensen (Zevenbergen), R. (eds) Shifts in the Field of Mathematics Education. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-179-4_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-179-4_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-287-178-7
Online ISBN: 978-981-287-179-4
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)