Cracking Failure Analysis of X70 Pipeline Steel Weld

  • Bin Wang
  • Senfeng Zhang
  • Cui Zhou
  • Nan Liu
  • Liang Wang
  • Xiaoyu Tian
Conference paper
Part of the Springer Proceedings in Energy book series (SPE)


The weld defects were detected by Nondestructive Testing Technology(NTT). The microstructure and microhardness were examined by optical microscope(OM), scanning electron microscopy (SEM) equipped with EDS and Vicker microhardness tester to identify the reasons of cracking failure in X70 pipeline steel weldment. As a result, the microstructure in the root layer and filling layer of the weld presents ferrite and pearlite while it is ferrite and bainite in the covering layer, but the morphology and distribution as well as the content of ferrite and pearlite in the root layer are different from which in the filling layer; the cracks initiate at the root of the weld and propagate towards filling layer, and the C, O, S segregation is serious, which contribute to the initiation and propagation of the crack in the weld; the hardness decreases sharply around the crack tip, which exhibits lower strength.


Microstructure Cracks Segregation 


  1. 1.
    E.S. Meresht, T.S. Farahani, J. Neshati, Failure analysis of stress corrosion cracking occurred in a gas transmission steel pipeline. J. Eng. Fail. Anal. 18, 963–970 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    M.A. Mohtadi-Bonab, J.A. Szpunar, R. Basu et al., The mechanism of failure by hydrogen induced cracking in an acidic environment for API 5L X70 pipeline steel. J. international journal of hydrogen energy. 40, 1096–1107 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    C.R.F. Azevedo, Failure analysis of a crude oil pipeline. J. Eng. Fail. Anal. 14, 978–994 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    A.Q. Fu, X.R. Kuang, Y. Han et al., Failure analysis of girth weld cracking of mechanically lined pipe used in gasfield gathering system. J. Eng. Fail. Anal. 68, 64–75 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    A. Farzadi, Gas pipeline failure caused by in-service welding. J. Pressure Vessel Technol. 138, 011405 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    H. Alipooramirabad, A. Paradowska, R. Ghomashchi et al., Investigating the effects of welding process on residual stresses, microstructure and mechanical properties in HSLA steel welds. J. Manuf. Process. 28, 70–81 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    F. Shen, B. Zhao, L. Li et al., Fatigue damage evolution and lifetime prediction of welded joints with the consideration of residual stresses and porosity. Int. J. Fatigue. 163, 272–279 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    T. Łagoda, P. Biłous, Ł. Blacha, Investigation on the effect of geometric and structural notch on the fatigue notch factor in steel welded joints. Int. J. Fatigue 101, 224–231 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wang A, Shi Y, Chen C, Effect of aging-deformation-treatment on the formation of intragranular ferrite in V-microalloyed steel. J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 1–6 (2017)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Natividad C, García R, López VH et al. Metallurgical characterization of API X65 steel joint welded by MIG welding process with axial magnetic field. J. Mater. Res. 8–17 (2017)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    R. Jiang, S. Everitt, N. Gao et al., Influence of oxidation on fatigue crack initiation and propagation in turbine disc alloy N18. J. Int. Fatigue. 75, 89–99 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bin Wang
    • 1
    • 3
  • Senfeng Zhang
    • 1
  • Cui Zhou
    • 2
  • Nan Liu
    • 4
  • Liang Wang
    • 1
  • Xiaoyu Tian
    • 5
  1. 1.School of Materials Science and EngineeringSouthwest Petroleum UniversityChengduChina
  2. 2.Shanghai Jianke Engneering Consulting Co. LtdShanghaiChina
  3. 3.Sichuan Provincial Research Center of Welding Engineering TechnologyChengduChina
  4. 4.Sichuan Petroleum and Natural Gas Construction Engineering Co. LTDChengduChina
  5. 5.One Two Project Management Co. LTDChengduChina

Personalised recommendations