Advertisement

Urban Rail Transit Platform Passenger Alighting and Boarding Movement and Experiment Research

  • Yang Li
  • Yanhui Wang
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering book series (LNEE, volume 482)

Abstract

With the improvement of the urban rail transit network and the rights of passengers demand, passenger traffic continuously raised, the operation of urban rail transit with the rights to add pressure. For urban rail transit system, the station for line capacity plays a decisive role, while getting in motion in the station is a key part of the passenger flow in the platform. So, in this paper, we study focuses on the junction between the train and the platform of passengers getting on or off motion and its influencing factors. This paper uses orthogonal experimental method to design experiment. Using the simulation experiment platform and the simulation experiment of the simulation software, two methods are used to study the passengers’ on and off motion. The time of getting on and off is used as experimental index to evaluate the result of experiment. As a result, it is important to cut down the time of train stop, reduce platform congestion and reinforce the operation and management level of urban rail transportation.

Keywords

Urban rail transit Station platform Passenger alighting and boarding movement Orthogonal experiment design method Alighting and boarding movement experiment 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge the support from “Key Research Project of Safety Assurance Technology of Urban Rail System” under China National “13th Five-Year Plan” (Grant No. 2016YFB1200402-002).

References

  1. 1.
    Frank GA, Dorso CO (2011) Room evacuation in the presence of an obstacle. Phys Stat Mech Appl 390(11):2135–2145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Alonso-Marroquin F, Azeezullah SI, Galindo-Torres SA et al (2012) Bottlenecks in granular flow: when does an obstacle increase the flow rate in an hourglass? Phys Rev E 85(2):020301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Harris NG, Anderson RJ (2007) An international comparison of urban rail boarding and alighting rates. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part F: J Rail Rapid Transit 221(4):521–526CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Zhang Q, Han B, Li D (2008) Modeling and simulation of passenger alighting and boarding movement in Beijing metro stations. Transp Res Part C: Emerg Technol 16(5):635–649CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Harris NG (2006) Train boarding and alighting rates at high passenger loads. J Adv Transp 40(3):249–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Daamen W, Lee Y, Wiggenraad P (2008) Boarding and alighting experiments: overview of setup and performance and some preliminary results. Transp Res Rec J Transp Res Board 2042:71–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Harris NG, Graham DJ, Anderson RJ et al (2014) The impact of urban rail boarding and alighting factors. In: TRB 9nd3 2014 annual meetingGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Zhang P, Zhang GW (2011) Characteristics analysis and modeling for passengers getting off time in urban rail transit. Urban Mass Transit 14(11):80–82 (In Chinese)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wiggenraad PBL (2001) Alighting and boarding times of passengers at Dutch railway stations. TRAIL Research School, DelftGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.State Key Laboratory of Rail Traffic Control and SafetyBeijing Jiaotong UniversityBeijingChina
  2. 2.School of Traffic and TransportationBeijing Jiaotong UniversityBeijingChina
  3. 3.Beijing Jiaotong UniversityBeijingPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations