Abstract
This chapter provides a comparison of intended curriculum and assessment between Austria and China, and it also discusses the rationale to understand these differences and similarities.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Australian Association of Mathematics Teachers (AAMT). (1997). Numeracy = everyone’s business: The report of the numeracy education strategy development conference May 1997. Adelaide, Australia: AAMT.
Australian Curriculum Corporation (ACC). (1994). Mathematics—A curriculum profile for Australian schools. Melbourne, Australia: ACC.
Australian Curriculum Corporation. (2000). Numeracy benchmarks years 3, 5 and 7 with professional elaboration. Melbourne, Australia: ACC.
Australian Education Council (AEC). (1990). A national statement on mathematics for Australian schools. Melbourne, Australia: AEC.
Australian Ministerial Council on Education, Employment, Training and Youth Affairs. (1999). Australia’s common and agreed national goals for schooling in the twenty-first century. Curriculum Perspectives, 19(4), 8–9.
Board of Studies New South Wales. (2002). Mathematics K-6 syllabus 2002. Sydney, Australia: BOS NSW.
Cao, F. Y. (1996). Collected works on reform in primary school mathematics education. Beijing, China: People’s Education Press.
Chinese Ministry of Education (CME). (1992). The curriculum scheme for nine-years compulsory education. Beijing, China: CME.
Chinese Ministry of Education. (1992). The mathematics syllabus for primary schools for nine-year compulsory education (Trial ed.). Beijing, China: People’s Education Press.
Chinese Ministry of Education. (2000a). National mathematics curriculum standards for nine-year compulsory education. Beijing, China: Beijing Normal University Press.
Chinese Ministry of Education. (2000b). The mathematics syllabus for primary schools for nine-year compulsory education (Revised Edition). Beijing, China: People’s Education Press.
Chinese Ministry of Education. (2012). National mathematics curriculum standards for nine-year compulsory education (2011th ed.). Beijing, China: Beijing Normal University Press.
Department of Education Training and Youth Affairs. (2000). Numeracy, a priority for all: Challenges for Australian schools. Canberra, China: DETYA.
Groves, S. (1996). Good use of technology changes the nature of classroom mathematics. In P. C. Clarkson (Ed.), 19th conference of the mathematics education research group of Australasia (pp. 10–19). Melbourne, Australia: MERGA.
Groves, S. (1997). The effect of long-term calculator use on children’s understanding of number: Results from the ‘calculators in primary mathematics’ project. In N. Scott & H. Hollingsworth (Eds.), Mathematics, creating the future: 16th biennial conference of the Australian association of mathematics teachers (pp. 150–158). Melbourne, Australia: AAMT.
Hembree, R., & Dessart, D. J. (1986). Effects of hand-held calculators in precollege mathematics education: a meta-analysis. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 17(2), 83–99.
Hembree, R. & Dessart, D. J. (1992). Research on calculators in mathematics education, in J. T. Fey & C. R. Hirsch (Eds.), Calculators in mathematics education, 1992 Yearbook (pp. 23–32). Reston, VA: NCTM.
Leung, F. K. S. (2001). In search of an East Asian identity in mathematics education. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 47(1), 35–51.
Lu, J. (1998). Reforming the primary school mathematics curriculum for the 21st century. Curriculum Textbook Pedagogic, October, 33–38.
McClain, K., Cobb, P., Gravemeijer, K., & Estes, B. (1999). Developing mathematical reasoning with the context of measurement. In S. V. Lee & C. R. Frances (Eds.), Developing mathematical reasoning in grades K-12, 1999 Yearbook (pp. 93–106). Reston, Australia: NCTM.
Moss, J., & Case, R. (1999). Developing children’s understanding of rational numbers: A new model and experimental curriculum. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 30(2), 127–147.
Mullis, I., Martin, M., Gonzalez, E., Garden, R., O’Connor, K., Chrostowski, S. & Smith, T. (2000). TIMSS 1999: international mathematics reports, finding from IEA’s Repeat of Third International Mathematics and Science Study at the Eighth Grade. Massachusetts: Center for the Study of Testing, Evaluation and Educational Policy, Boston College.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1989). Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics. Reston, Australia: NCTM.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1991). Professional standards for teaching mathematics. Reston, Australia: NCTM.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1995). The assessment standards for school mathematics. Reston, Australia: NCTM.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, Australia: NCTM.
New South Wales Department of Education. (1989). Mathematics K-6. Sydney, Australia: NSW Department of Education.
New South Wales Department of Education and Training. (1996). Strategies for assessment and reporting in primary schools. Sydney, Australia: NSW DET.
New South Wales Department of Education and Training. (1998). Count me in too: Professional development package. Ryde, Australia: Curriculum Support Directorate.
Niss, M. (1996). Goals of mathematics teaching. In A. J. Bishop, et al. (Eds.), International handbook of mathematics education (pp. 11–47). Dordrecht, Netherland: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Price, R. (1992). Moral-political education and modernization. In R. Hayhoe (Ed.), Education and modernization: the Chinese experience. Oxford, New York: Pergamon Press.
Robitaille, D. F., McKnight, C., Schmidt, W., Britton, E., Raizen, S., & Nicol, C., (1993). TIMSS monograph no. 1: Curriculum frameworks for mathematics and science. Vancouver, Canada: Pacific Educational Press.
Schmidt, H., McKnight, C. C., & Raizen, S. A. (1997). A splintered vision: An investigation of US. Science and mathematics education. Dordrecht, Netherland: Kluwer Academic.
Terwel, J. (1999). Constructivism and its implications for curriculum theory and practice. Curriculum Studies, 31(2), 195–199.
Zhang, W. G., Wang, Y. L., Gu, A. Z., Mai, Y. C., & Li, J. H. (1994). Teaching materials and methods for primary school mathematics. Beijing, China: The People’s Education Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Zhao, D. (2016). A Comparison of Australian and Chinese Mathematics Curricula and Assessment. In: Chinese Students' Higher Achievement in Mathematics. Mathematics Education – An Asian Perspective. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0285-4_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0285-4_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-10-0283-0
Online ISBN: 978-981-10-0285-4
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)