Skip to main content

A Comparison of Australian and Chinese Mathematics Curricula and Assessment

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Chinese Students' Higher Achievement in Mathematics

Part of the book series: Mathematics Education – An Asian Perspective ((MATHEDUCASPER))

  • 791 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter provides a comparison of intended curriculum and assessment between Austria and China, and it also discusses the rationale to understand these differences and similarities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Australian Association of Mathematics Teachers (AAMT). (1997). Numeracy = everyone’s business: The report of the numeracy education strategy development conference May 1997. Adelaide, Australia: AAMT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Australian Curriculum Corporation (ACC). (1994). Mathematics—A curriculum profile for Australian schools. Melbourne, Australia: ACC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Australian Curriculum Corporation. (2000). Numeracy benchmarks years 3, 5 and 7 with professional elaboration. Melbourne, Australia: ACC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Australian Education Council (AEC). (1990). A national statement on mathematics for Australian schools. Melbourne, Australia: AEC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Australian Ministerial Council on Education, Employment, Training and Youth Affairs. (1999). Australia’s common and agreed national goals for schooling in the twenty-first century. Curriculum Perspectives, 19(4), 8–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Board of Studies New South Wales. (2002). Mathematics K-6 syllabus 2002. Sydney, Australia: BOS NSW.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cao, F. Y. (1996). Collected works on reform in primary school mathematics education. Beijing, China: People’s Education Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chinese Ministry of Education (CME). (1992). The curriculum scheme for nine-years compulsory education. Beijing, China: CME.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chinese Ministry of Education. (1992). The mathematics syllabus for primary schools for nine-year compulsory education (Trial ed.). Beijing, China: People’s Education Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chinese Ministry of Education. (2000a). National mathematics curriculum standards for nine-year compulsory education. Beijing, China: Beijing Normal University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chinese Ministry of Education. (2000b). The mathematics syllabus for primary schools for nine-year compulsory education (Revised Edition). Beijing, China: People’s Education Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chinese Ministry of Education. (2012). National mathematics curriculum standards for nine-year compulsory education (2011th ed.). Beijing, China: Beijing Normal University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Education Training and Youth Affairs. (2000). Numeracy, a priority for all: Challenges for Australian schools. Canberra, China: DETYA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Groves, S. (1996). Good use of technology changes the nature of classroom mathematics. In P. C. Clarkson (Ed.), 19th conference of the mathematics education research group of Australasia (pp. 10–19). Melbourne, Australia: MERGA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Groves, S. (1997). The effect of long-term calculator use on children’s understanding of number: Results from the ‘calculators in primary mathematics’ project. In N. Scott & H. Hollingsworth (Eds.), Mathematics, creating the future: 16th biennial conference of the Australian association of mathematics teachers (pp. 150–158). Melbourne, Australia: AAMT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hembree, R., & Dessart, D. J. (1986). Effects of hand-held calculators in precollege mathematics education: a meta-analysis. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 17(2), 83–99. 

    Google Scholar 

  • Hembree, R. & Dessart, D. J. (1992). Research on calculators in mathematics education, in J. T. Fey & C. R. Hirsch (Eds.), Calculators in mathematics education, 1992 Yearbook (pp. 23–32). Reston, VA: NCTM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leung, F. K. S. (2001). In search of an East Asian identity in mathematics education. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 47(1), 35–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lu, J. (1998). Reforming the primary school mathematics curriculum for the 21st century. Curriculum Textbook Pedagogic, October, 33–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • McClain, K., Cobb, P., Gravemeijer, K., & Estes, B. (1999). Developing mathematical reasoning with the context of measurement. In S. V. Lee & C. R. Frances (Eds.), Developing mathematical reasoning in grades K-12, 1999 Yearbook (pp. 93–106). Reston, Australia: NCTM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moss, J., & Case, R. (1999). Developing children’s understanding of rational numbers: A new model and experimental curriculum. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 30(2), 127–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mullis, I., Martin, M., Gonzalez, E., Garden, R., O’Connor, K., Chrostowski, S. & Smith, T. (2000).  TIMSS 1999: international mathematics reports, finding from IEA’s Repeat of Third International Mathematics and Science Study at the Eighth Grade. Massachusetts: Center for the Study of Testing, Evaluation and Educational Policy, Boston College.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1989). Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics. Reston, Australia: NCTM.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1991). Professional standards for teaching mathematics. Reston, Australia: NCTM.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1995). The assessment standards for school mathematics. Reston, Australia: NCTM.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, Australia: NCTM.

    Google Scholar 

  • New South Wales Department of Education. (1989). Mathematics K-6. Sydney, Australia: NSW Department of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • New South Wales Department of Education and Training. (1996). Strategies for assessment and reporting in primary schools. Sydney, Australia: NSW DET.

    Google Scholar 

  • New South Wales Department of Education and Training. (1998). Count me in too: Professional development package. Ryde, Australia: Curriculum Support Directorate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niss, M. (1996). Goals of mathematics teaching. In A. J. Bishop, et al. (Eds.), International handbook of mathematics education (pp. 11–47). Dordrecht, Netherland: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Price, R. (1992). Moral-political education and modernization. In R. Hayhoe (Ed.), Education and modernization: the Chinese experience. Oxford, New York: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robitaille, D. F., McKnight, C., Schmidt, W., Britton, E., Raizen, S., & Nicol, C., (1993). TIMSS monograph no. 1: Curriculum frameworks for mathematics and science. Vancouver, Canada: Pacific Educational Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, H., McKnight, C. C., & Raizen, S. A. (1997). A splintered vision: An investigation of US. Science and mathematics education. Dordrecht, Netherland: Kluwer Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Terwel, J. (1999). Constructivism and its implications for curriculum theory and practice. Curriculum Studies, 31(2), 195–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, W. G., Wang, Y. L., Gu, A. Z., Mai, Y. C., & Li, J. H. (1994). Teaching materials and methods for primary school mathematics. Beijing, China: The People’s Education Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dacheng Zhao .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Zhao, D. (2016). A Comparison of Australian and Chinese Mathematics Curricula and Assessment. In: Chinese Students' Higher Achievement in Mathematics. Mathematics Education – An Asian Perspective. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0285-4_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0285-4_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-0283-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-0285-4

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics