Abstract
Much of the literature on feminist pedagogy confronts the hierarchical values within a patriarchal society and subsequent institutional settings (Bardsley, 2006; Bauer, 2009). Within this argument and through this lens of thinking about teaching and learning, the focus is often on providing females access and opportunity for the same experiences and engagement within the learning environment that their male counterparts are provided (Buchman, Diprete, & McDaniel, 2007; Lynch & Feeley, 2009).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
American Association of University Women. (1992). How schools shortchange girls. Washington, DC: AAUW & National Education Association.
Banks, J. A. (2001). Cultural diversity and education. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
Bardsley, A. (2006).Girlfight the power: Teaching contemporary feminism and pop culture. Feminist Teacher, 16(3), 189–204.
Barnes-Holmes, Y., Barnes-Holmes, D., & Cullinan, V. (2001). Education. In S. C. Hayes, D. Barnes Holmes, & B. Roche (Eds.), Relational frame theory: A post Skinnerian account of human language and cognition (pp. 181–196). New York, NY: Kluwer.
Bauer, D. M. (2009). Authority. In R. D. Crabtree, D. A. Sapp, & A. C. Licona (Eds.), Feminist pedagogy: Looking back to move forward (pp. 23–26). Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins University Press.
Buchman, C., Diprete, T., & McDaniel, A. (2007). Gender inequalities in education: ISERP working paper 07-15. New York, NY: Columbia University in the City of New York—Institute for Social an Economic Research and Policy.
Bullough, R. V. (1994). Personal history and teaching metaphors: A self-study of teaching as conversation. Teacher Education Quarterly, 21(1), 107–120.
Clandinin, D. J., & Connelly, F. M. (2000). Narrative inquiry: Experience and story in qualitative research. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Dee, T. S. (2007, Summer). Teachers and the gender gap in student achievement. Journal of Human Resources 42(3), 528–554.
Ember, C. R. (1974). An evaluation of alternative theories of matrilocal versus patrilocal residence. Cross-Cultural Research, 9(2), 135–149.
Engels, F. ([1884] 1972). The origins of family, private property, and the state. New York, NY: Pathfinder.
Frazier, E. F. (1968). The Negro family in the United States. New York, NY: Macmillan.
Gatson S. N. (2007). Matriarchy. In W. A. Darity, E. Bonilla-Silva, P. Costanzo, P. L. Mason, P. McClain, D. & Scott, T. Singleton (Eds.), International encyclopedia of the social sciences (2nd ed., pp. 28–31). Farmington Hills: Macmillan/Thomson Gale.
Goettner-Abendroth, H. (2004). Matriarchal society: Definition and theory. In G.Vaughan (Ed.), The gift: A feminist analysis. Retrieved from http://www.gift-economy.com/athanor/anthanor_005.html
Goettner-Abendroth, H. (2005). Modern matriarchal studies: Definition, scope and topicality. Paper presented at the 2nd World Congress on Matriarchal Studies, Austin, TX, September 29–October 1.
Gough, K. (1961) The modern disintegration of matrilineal descent groups. In D. M. Schneider & K. Gough (Eds.), Matrilineal kinship (pp. 631–654). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Hayes, S. C., Fox, E., Gifford, E. V., Wilson, K. G., Barnes-Holmes, D., & Healy, O. (2001). Derived relational responding as learned behavior. In S. C. Hayes, D. Barnes-Holmes, & B. Roche (Eds.), Relational frame theory: A post-Skinnerian account of human language and cognition (pp. 21–50). New York, NY: Kluwer.
Heath, C., Hindmarsh, J., & Luff, P. (2010). Video in qualitative research: Analyzing social interaction in everyday life. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Hoskins, J. (2005) Matriarchy. New dictionary of the history of ideas. Retrieved August 20, 2013, from http://www.encyclopedia.com/doc/1G2-3424300460.html
Kitchen, J. (2009). Passages: Improving teacher education through narrative self-study. In D. L. Tidwell, M. L. Heston, & L. M. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Research methods for the self-study of practice (pp. 35–53). Berlin: Springer.
Kluckhohn, C. (1949). Mirror for man. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
Kroeber, A. (1952). The nature of culture. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
LaBoskey, V. K., & Cline, S. (2000). Behind the mirror: Inquiry-based storying in teacher education. Reflective Practice, 1(3), 359–375.
LaBoskey, V. K., & Hamilton, M. L. (2010). “Doing as I do”: The role of teacher educator self-study in educating for reflective inquiry. In N. Lyons (Ed.), Handbook of reflection and reflective inquiry (pp. 333–350). New York, NY: Springer.
Langan, D., & Davidson, D. (2005). Critical pedagogy and personal struggles: Feminist scholarship outside women’s studies. Feminist Teacher, 15(2), 132–145.
Lapadat, J. C., Black, N. E., Clark, P. G., Gremm, R. M., Karanja, L. W., Mieke, M., & Quinlan, L. (2010). Life challenge memory work: Using collaborative autobiography to understand ourselves. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 9(1), 77–104.
Laquer, T. (1992). The facts of fatherhood. In B. Thorne & M. Yalom (Eds.), Rethinking the family: Some feminist questions (pp. 155–175). Boston, MA: Northeastern University Press.
Lynch, K., & Feeley, M. (2009). Gender and education (and employment): Lessons from research for policy makers. Brussels: European Commission.
Moynihan, D. P. (1965). The Negro family: The case for national action. Washington, DC: Office of Policy Planning and Research, U.S. Department of Labor. Retrieved from http://www.dol.gov/oasam/programs/history/webid-meynihan.htm
Sadker, M., & Sadker, D. (1994). Failing at fairness: How America’s schools cheat girls. New York, NY: Maxwell Macmillan
Sadker, M., & Zittelman, K. (2009). Still failing at fairness: How gender bias cheats girls and boys in school and what we can do about it. New York, NY: Scribner.
Schneider, D. (1961). The distinctive features of matrilineal descent groups. In D. Schneider & K. Gough (Eds.), Matrilineal kinship (pp. 1–29). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Swenson, L. M., & Strough, J. (2008). Adolescents’ collaboration in the classroom: Do peer relationships or gender matter? Psychology in the Schools, 45(8), 715–728.
U.S. Department of Labor. (2011). Women’s employment during the recovery. Washington, DC: US Department of Labor.
Zimmerman, L. W. McQueen, L., & Guy, G. (2007). Connections, interconnections, and disconnections: The impact of race, class and gender in the university classroom. Journal of Theory Construction & Testing, 11(1), 16–21.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Sense Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Tidwell, D.L., Schwartz, P.T., Dunn, J.T. (2014). Familial Reality Engendering Feminism. In: Taylor, M., Coia, L. (eds) Gender, Feminism, and Queer Theory in the Self-Study of Teacher Education Practices. Professional Learning. SensePublishers, Rotterdam. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6209-686-8_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6209-686-8_7
Publisher Name: SensePublishers, Rotterdam
Online ISBN: 978-94-6209-686-8
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)