Skip to main content
  • 2255 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter uses demographic data to examine the family structure of gay males and lesbians and their biological and non- biological children. First, I explore the background and data limitations. Next, I use National Survey of Family Growth (NSFG) ASCI 2006–2010 data, merged with NSFG open access files, to explore the following research questions. First: how are individuals identified as heterosexual, gay, lesbian, and bisexual across behavior, attraction, and orientation? Second: what are the demographic characteristics of these individuals? Third: are there children, including foster children, in the households of gay and lesbian individuals? Fourth: do gay males and lesbians report a different presence of children and foster children than heterosexuals?

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Gates and Newport (2012, 2013) posed that the Gallup poll of 206,186, surveyed more than either the General Social Survey, that surveyed about 2,000 adults annually a sexual orientation question 2008 and; or the NSFG that surveyed young adults aged 18 to 44, about 20,000 from 2006–2010.

  2. 2.

    “…all of the states that have LGBT populations of at least 4 % have laws that prohibit discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity and allow same-sex couples to marry, enter into a civil union, or register as domestic partners. Of the 10 states with the lowest percentage of LGBT adults, only Iowa has such laws (Gates and Newcome 2013, p. 3)”.

  3. 3.

    Miller and Ryan report “In designing a new question, the 2006 NSFG version was used as a point of departure because it was regarded as the best performing question to date on a survey. In order to improve upon the 2006 NSFG version, it was determined that the goals for the new question would be to (1) reduce misclassification of non-minority respondents, (2) reduce rates of ‘don’t know’ and ‘something else’ and (3), particularly for those respondents who do fall into ‘something else,’ be able to sort non-minority from minority sexual identity cases (2011, p. 6).”

  4. 4.

    Refer to the Amicus Curiae American Sociological Association in Support of Respondent Kristin M. V. Perry and Respondent Edith Schlain Windsor for sociological research supporting same sex marriage.

  5. 5.

    NACAC (2005) Policy statement on Gay and Lesbian Adoptions and Foster Care: “Philosophy-Children should not be denied a permanent family because of the sexual orientation of potential parents. Practice and Policy Recommendations- All prospective foster and adoptive parents, regardless of sexual orientation, should be given fair and equal consideration.

    NACAC opposes rules and legislation that restrict the consideration of current or prospective foster and adoptive parents based on their sexual orientation.

    Professional organization that support gay and lesbian adoptions: The American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry (1999); The American Academy of Pediatrics (2002); The American Bar Association (1999, 2003); The American Psychoanalytic Association (2002); The American Psychological Association (2004); The Child Welfare League of America (2004); The National Adoption Center (1998); The National Association of Social Workers (2002) (Davis 2011).

  6. 6.

    There is ongoing support for Gay and Lesbian Adoptions by multiple professional organizations:

    The American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry (1999)

    The American Academy of Pediatrics (2002)

    The American Bar Association (1999, 2003)

    The American Psychoanalytic Association (2002)

    The American Psychological Association (2004)

    The Child Welfare League of America (2004)

    The National Adoption Center (1998)

    The National Association of Social Workers (2002)

    The North American Council on Adoptable Children (2005).

References

  • Adoption and Foster Care Analysis and Reporting System (AFCARS) FY 2011 data. (2012). http://www.acf.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/cb/afcarsreport19.pdf. Accessed 22 March 2013.

  • American Sociological Association. (2013). Amicus Curiae American Sociological Association. In support of respondent Kristin M. Perry and Respondent Edith Schlain.

    Google Scholar 

  • Badgett, M.V. L, and Rogers M. A. (2003). Left out of the count: missing same-sex couples in census 2000. Amherst, MA: Institute for Gay and Lesbian Strategic Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barth, R. P., Lee, C. K., Wildfire, J., & Guo, S. (2006). A comparison of the governmental costs of long‐term foster care and adoption. Social Service Review, 80(1), 127–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumle, A. K., & Compton D’Lane, R. (2007). Legislating the family: The effect of state family laws on the presence of children in same-sex households paper presented at the annual meeting of the The Law and Society Association, TBA, Berlin, Germany, July 25, 2007. http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p181709_index.html. Accessed 24 May 2009. (BBC News).

  • Baumle, Amanda K.; Compton, D. and Poston, Jr. D. L. (2009). Same sex partners: the social demography of sexual orientation. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biblarz, T. J., & Evren, S. (2010). Lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender families. Journal of Marriage and Family, 72, 480–497.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brodzinsky, D. M., & The staff of the Evan B. Donaldson Adoption Institute. (2006). Adoption by lesbians and gays: A national survey of adoption agency policies, practices, and attitudes. http://www.adoptioninstitute.org/whowe/Gay%20and%20Lesbian%20Adoption1.html. Accessed 30 May 2009.

  • Brooks, D.; Goldberg, S. (2001). Gay and lesbian adoptive and foster care placements: can they meet the needs of waiting children? Social Work, 46 (2):147–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, C. (2005) Self-reported sexual orientation and earnings: Evidence from California. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, Cornell University, ILR School 58(2): 258–273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chauncey, G. (2005). Why marriage?: the history shaping today’s debate over gay equality. Basic Books: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, M. A. (2011). Children for families or families for children: the demography of adoption behavior in the U.S. New York: Springer Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evan, B. Donaldson Adoption Institute. (2006). Expanding resources for children: Is adoption by gays and lesbians part of the answer for boys and girls who need homes? http://www.adoptioninstitute.org/publications/2006_Expanding_Resources_for_Children%20_March_.pdf. Accessed February 2013.

  • Gates, G. J. (2005). Binational same-sex unmarried partners in census 2000: A demographic portrait. The Williams Institute. http://williamsinstitute.law.ucla.edu/wp-content/uploads/Gates-Binational-Report-Oct-2005.pdf. Accessed February 2013.

  • Gates, G. J. (2010). Sexual minorities in the 2008 General Social Survey: coming out and demographic characteristics. UCLA: The Williams Institute. http://escholarship.org/uc/item/00d2w91k. Accessed 3 July 2014.

  • Gates, G. J. (2012). LGBT identity: A demographer’s perspective. Loyola Los Angeles Law Review 45(3), 693–714.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gates, G. J., & Cooke, A. M. (2011). Census 2010 snapshot series. The Williams Institute. http://williamsinstitute.law.ucla.edu/wp-content/uploads/Census2010Snapshot-US-v2.pdf.

  • Gates, G., & Newport, F. (2012). Special report: 3.4 % of U.S. adults identify as LGBT: Inaugural Gallup findings based on more than 120,000 interviews. Gallup politics. http://www.gallup.com/poll/158066/special-report-adults-identify-lgbt.aspx. Accessed 20 March 2013.

  • Gates, G., & Newport, F. (2013). LGBT percentage highest in D.C., Lowest in North Dakota. Gallup politics. http://www.gallup.com/poll/160517/lgbt-percentage-highest-lowest-north-dakota.aspx. Accessed 20 March 2013.

  • Gates, G., Badgett, L. M. V., Macomber, J. E., & Chambers, K. (2007). Adoption and foster care by lesbian and gay parents in the United States. -1-37. http://www.urban.org/url.cfm?ID=411437. Accessed 30 May 2009.

  • Goldberg, A. E., & Gianino, M. (2011). Lesbian and gay adoptive parent families: Assessment, clinical issues, and intervention. In D. Brodzinsky & A. Pertman (Eds.), Adoption by lesbians and gay men: A new dimension in family diversity (pp. 204–232). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huffington Post. (31 Oct 2011). Every child deserves a family. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/rep-kirsten-gillibrand/every-child-deserves-a-family_b_1067306.html. Accessed February 2013.

  • Kinsey, A. C., Pomery, W. B., & Martin, C. E. (1948/1998). Sexual behavior in the human male. Philadelphia/Bloomington: W.B. Saunders/Indiana U. Press. (First publication of Kinsey’s Heterosexual-Homosexual rating scale. Discusses Kinsey Scale, pp. 636–659).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kinsey, A. C., et al. (1953/1998). Sexual behavior in the human female. Philadelphia/Bloomington: W.B. Saunders/Indiana U. Press. (Discusses the Kinsey Scale and presents comparisons of male and female data, pp. 468–475).

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, F., Sepekoff, B., & Wolf, T. J. (1985). Sexual orientation. Journal of Homosexuality, 11(1–2), 35–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lobaugh, E. R.; Clements, P. T.; Averill, J. B.; Olguin, David L. 2006. Gay-male couples who adopt: challenging historical and contemporary social trends toward becoming a family. Perspectives in Psychiatric Care, 42 (3): 184–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • McVeigh, R., & Diaz, M.-E. D. (2009). Voting to ban same-sex marriage: Interests, values, and communities. American Sociological Review, 74(6), 891–915.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meezan, W., & Rauch, J. (2005). Gay marriage, same-sex parenting, and America’s children gay marriage, same-sex parenting, and America’s children. Marriage and child wellbeing: The future of children, 15(2), 97–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, K. & Ryan, J. M. (2011). Design, development and testing of the NHIS sexual identity question. Questionnaire Design Research Laboratory, Office of Research and Methodology, National Center for Health Statistics. http://wwwn.cdc.gov/qbank/report/Miller_NCHS_2011_NHIS%20Sexual%20Identity.pdf. Accessed on February 2014.

  • Movement Advancement Project (MAP), Family Equality Council and Center for American Progress. (2011a). All children matter: How legal and social inequalities hurt LGBT families (Full Report). http://lgbtmap.org/file/all-children-matter-full-report.pdf. Accessed February 2013.

  • Movement Advancement Project (MAP), Family Equality Council and Center for American Progress. (2011b). Sexual identity question. http://www.lgbttobacco.org/files/Final%20Report%20Sexual%20Identity.pdf. Accessed February 2013 and 19 March 2013.

  • National Coalition for LGBT Health. (2010). http://lgbthealth.webolutionary.com/sites/default/files/LGBT%20Inclusion%20in%20Surveys_0.pdf. Accessed 28 Feb 2013.

  • National Conference of State Legislatures. (2013). Same sex marriage laws. http://www.ncsl.org/issues-research/human-services/same-sex-marriage-laws.aspx. Accessed 25 June 2013.

  • North American Council on Adoptable Children. (2005). NACAC position statements: Gay and lesbian adoptions and foster care. http://www.nacac.org/policy/positions.html#Gay. Accessed 26 May 2009.

  • Patterson, C. J. (1992). Children of lesbian and gay parents. Child Development, 63(5), 1025–1042.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Powell, B., Bolzendalh, C., Geist, C., & Steelman, L. C. (2010). Counted out: Same-sex relations and Americans’ definitions of family. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rust, P. C. R. (2000a). Bisexuality in the United States: A social sciences reader. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rust, P. C. R. (2000b). Bisexuality: A contemporary paradox for women. Journal of Social Issues, 56(2), 205–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, S. D., Pearlmutter, S., & Groza, V. (2004). Coming out of the closet: Opening agencies to gay and lesbian adoptive parents. Social Work, 49(1), 85–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stacey, J., & Biblarz, T. J. (2001). (How) does the sexual orientation of parents matter? American Sociological Review, 66(2), 159–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United States Supreme Court. (2013a). Hollingsworth Et Al v. Perry Et Al Certiorari To The United States Court Of Appeals For The Ninth Circuit No. 12-144. Argued March 26, 2013-Decided June 26, 2013. http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/12pdf/12-144_8ok0.pdf. Accessed 20 Aug 2013.

  • United States Supreme Court. (2013b). United States V. Windsor, Executor Of The Estate Of Spyer, Et Al Ertiorari To The United States Court Of Appeals For The Second Circuit No. 12-307. Argued March 27, 2013-Decided June 26, 2013. http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/12pdf/12-307_6j37.pdf. Accessed 20 Aug 2013.

  • Walther, C. S., Poston Dudley, L. Jr., & Gu, Y. (2011). Ecological analyses of gay male and lesbian partnering in the metropolitan United States in 2000. Population Research and Policy Review, 30, 419–448.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mary Ann Davis .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Davis, M. (2014). Constructing Families: Gay Male and Lesbian Foster Families. In: Farris, D., Davis, M., Compton, D. (eds) Illuminating How Identities, Stereotypes and Inequalities Matter through Gender Studies. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-8718-5_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics