Skip to main content

Abstract

The TLS problem can be solved by using neural networks. However, this method can be better described in the framework of iterative numerical methods for TLS. This is justified by the separation between the neural and the numerical experts. The inexperience of the neural experts in numerical analysis also explains the confusion in the neural literature about the Minor Component Analysis (MCA) and the TLS. This paper shows the exact difference between MCA and TLS techniques and the algorithmic consequences. The MCA neural networks are presented, analysed and compared, above all for large sets of linear equations. The superiority of the MCA EXIN neural network is emphasized. In the end the TLS neural networks are described. The TLS EXIN neural network (derived from MCA EXIN) is the best technique and has very important properties, like the existence of universal initial conditions, the possibility to be accelerated and to solve the nongeneric TLS problem automatically.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. G. Cirrincione. A Neural Approach to the Structure from Motion Problem. PhD thesis, LIS INPG Grenoble, December 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  2. G. Cirrincione and M. Cirrincione. Linear system identification using the tls exin neuron. In NEURAP 98, Marseille ( France ), March 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  3. G. Cirrincione and M. Cirrincione. Robust total least squares by the nonlinear mca exin neuron. In Proc. IEEE Intern. Joint Symposia on Intelligence and Systems, pages 295–300, Rockville, Maryland (USA), May 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  4. G. Cirrincione, M. Cirrincione, J. Herault, and S. Van Huffel. The mca exin neuron for the minor component analysis. IEEE Trans. on Neural Networks,2001. (to appear).

    Google Scholar 

  5. G. Cirrincione, M. Cirrincione, and S. Van Huffel. Generalization and scheduling of tls problems. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing,2001. Submitted.

    Google Scholar 

  6. G. Cirrincione, M. Cirrincione, and G. Vitale. Identificazione di parametri di azionamenti elettrici con tecniche combinate neurali e tls. Seminario Interattivo su Azionamenti Elettrici, Innovazioni Tecnologiche e Problematiche Emergenti (ANAE), March 1999. Bressanone (BZ), Italy.

    Google Scholar 

  7. D.Z. Feng, Z. Bao, and L.C. Jiao. Total least mean squares algorithm. IEEE Trans. on Signal Processing, 46 (8): 2122–2130, August 1998.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. K. Gao, M.O. Ahmad, and M.N. Swamy. Learning algorithm for total least-squares adaptive signal processing. Electronic Letters, 28 (4): 430–432, February 1992.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. K. Gao, M.O. Ahmad, and M.N. Swamy. A constrained anti-hebbian learning algorithm for total least-squares estimation with applications to adaptive fir and iir filtering. IEEE Trans. on Circuits and Systems-II: Analog and Digital Processing, 41 (11): 718–729, November 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  10. M. Hestenes. Conjugate Direction Methods in Optimization. Springer-Verlag New York, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  11. F. Luo, R. Unbehauen, and A. Cichocki. A minor component analysis algorithm. Neural Networks, 10 (2): 291–297, 1997.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. G. Mathew and V. Reddy. Development and analysis of a neural network approach to pisarenko’s harmonic retrieval method. IEEE Trans. on Signal Processing, (42): 663–667, 1994a.

    Google Scholar 

  13. E. Oja. Principal components, minor components and linear neural networks. Neural Networks, 5: 927–935, 1992.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. A. Taleb and G. Cirrincione. Against the convergence of the minor component analysis neurons. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, 10 (1): 207–210, January 1999.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. L. Xu, E. Oja, and C. Suen. Modified hebbian learning for curve and surface fitting. Neural Networks, 5: 441–457, 1992.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Cirrincione, G., Cirrincione, M. (2002). Neural Minor Component Analysis and TLS. In: Van Huffel, S., Lemmerling, P. (eds) Total Least Squares and Errors-in-Variables Modeling. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-3552-0_21

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-3552-0_21

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-5957-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-017-3552-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics