Skip to main content

Part of the book series: NATO ASI Series ((ASID,volume 77))

Abstract

In the previous chapters, the concept of value was presented in a very abstract way. It has proved, however, to be a powerful tool in modelling some economic problems. In fact, since the Shapley value can be interpreted in terms of “marginal worth”, it is closely related to traditional economic ideas. To illustrate this, we first present the Value Equivalence Theorem — the analogue of the Core Equivalence Theorem. Though other important applications exist, we then focus on three applications of the value concept to economic models other than the general equilibrium model. Each of them describes a way of departing from the market model environment. The first two are economic-political models dealing with taxation. Taxation has (at least) two purposes: redistribution and the raising of funds to finance public goods. The classical literature assumes that a benevolent government takes decisions so as to maximize some social utility function. On the contrary, analysing the government as subject to the influence of those who elected it brings new light on both aspects. Value appears to be a natural tool to deal with the voting games that are part of the two corresponding models. In the last section, we deal with economies with fixed prices.

The author is very grateful to J.F. Mertens, who prepared this chapter on the basis of the author’s presentation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Arrow, K.J. & M. Kurz [1970], Public Investment, the Rate of Return,and Optimal Fiscal Policy, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Aumann, R. J. [1964], “Markets with a Continuum of Traders”, Econometrica, 32, 39–50.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Aumann, R. J. [ 1975 ], “Values of markets with a continuum of traders”, Econometrica, 43, 611–646.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Aumann, R. J. & M. Kurz [1977], “Power and taxes”,Econometrica,45, 1137–1161.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Aumann, R. J. & M. Kurz [1977], “Power and taxes in a multi-commodity economy”,Israel Journal of Mathematics27, 186–234

    Google Scholar 

  6. Aumann, R. J., M. Kurz & A. Neyman [1983], “Voting for Public Goods”, Review of Economic Studies,50, 677–693.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Aumann, R. J., M. Kurz & A. Neyman [1987], “Power and Public Goods”, Journal of Economic Theory,42, 108–127.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Aumann, R. J. & J. H. Drèze [1986], “Values of Markets with Satiation or Fixed Prices”, Econometrica,54, 1271–1318.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Champsaur P. [1975], “Cooperation versus Competition”,Journal of Economic Theory11,394–417

    Google Scholar 

  10. Drèze J.H.& H. Muller [1980], “Optimality Properties of Rationing Schemes”, Journal of Economic Theory,23, 150–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Harsanyi, J.C. [ 1959 ], “A bargaining model for the cooperative n-person game”, in “Contributions to the Theory of Games IV”, (A. W. Tucker and R. D. Luce, eds.), Ann. of Math. Studies, 40, 325–355. Princeton University Press, Priceton, N.J..

    Google Scholar 

  12. Nash, J.F. [ 1953 ], “Two Person Cooperative Games”, Econometrica, 21, 128–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Shapley, L.S. [ 1953 ], “A value for n-person games”, in “Contributions to the Theory of Games II”, (H. W. Kuhn and A. W. Tucker, eds), Ann. of Math. Studies, 28, 307–317, Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Shapley, L.S. [ 1969 ], “Utility Comparisons and the Theory of Games”, in “La Décision”, 251–263, Editions du Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Paris, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1994 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Aumann, R.J. (1994). Economic Applications of the Shapley Value. In: Mertens, JF., Sorin, S. (eds) Game-Theoretic Methods in General Equilibrium Analysis. NATO ASI Series, vol 77. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1656-7_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1656-7_12

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-4442-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-017-1656-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics