Skip to main content

Abstract

In principle, one can distinguish two basic subclasses of contact tasks. One subclass essentially covers force tasks, whose very nature requires an end-effector to establish physical contact with the environment and exert a process-specific force. In general, these tasks require both the position of the end-effector and the interaction force to be controlled simultaneously. A typical example of such tasks is machining processes such as grinding, deburring, polishing, bending, etc. In these tasks, force is an inherent part of the process and plays a decisive role in its execution (e.g., metal cutting or plastic deformation). In order to prevent overloading or damaging of the tool during the operation, force must be controlled in accordance with some definite task requirements.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. S. Ku, S.E. Salcudean, “Design and Control of a Teleoperated Microgripper for Microsurgery”, Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Minneapolis, pp. 889–894, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  2. D.W. Heikkinen, B. Musits, “Sankyo Robotics and ROBODOC — A Story of International Cooperation”, Proceedings of the 24th International Symposium on Industrial Robotics (ISIR), Tokyo, Japan, Session C-4, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  3. G.H. Watson, R.L. Tucker, J.K. Walters (editors), Automation and Robotics in Construction X, Proceedings of the 10th International Symposium on Automation and Robotics in Construction (ISARC), Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  4. P.T. Clarke, S.J. Key, P. Tang, “Development of Robot Technology for Meat Deboning”, Proceedings of International Symposium on Robots of the Australian Robot Association and the International Federation of Robotics, Sydney, Australia, pp. 427–439, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  5. A. Rodic, M. Vukobratovic, Dynamics, Integrated Control and Stability of Automated Road Vehicles, Ibidem-Verlag, Stuttgart, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  6. A. Rodic, M. Vukobratovic, “Design of an Integrated Active Control System of Road Vehicles”, Intern. Journal of Computer Application in Technology, special issue on Active Structures, Vol. 13, Nos. 1/2, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  7. M. Vukobratovic, D. Juricic, “Contribution to the Synthesis of Biped Gait”, IEEE Trans. on Automatic Control, Vol. 16, No 1, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  8. D. Juricic, M. Vukobratovic, “Mathematical Modeling of a Bipedal Walking System”, Proc. of the ASME winter annual meeting, (72-WA/BHF-13, New York), Nov. 26–130, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  9. M. Vukobratovic, “How to Control Artificial Anthropomorphic Systems”, IEEE Trans. on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Vol. SMC-3, Sept. 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  10. M. Sorli, M. Vukobratovic, C. Ferraresi, M. Kolarski, B. Borovac, “ Mechanics of Turin Parallel Robot”, Mechanism and Machine Theory, Vol. 32, No 1, pp. 51–77, 1997.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. M. Vukobratovic, Yu. Ekalo, “New Approach to Control of Robotic Manipulators Interacting with Dynamic Environment”, Robotica, Vol. 14, pp. 31–39, 1996.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. D. Stokic, M. Vukobratovic, “Practical Stabilization of Robots Interacting with Dynamic Environment”, Int. Journal of Robotics and Automation, Vol. 13, Issue 4, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  13. V. Golovin, “Robot for Massage”, Proceedings of JARP 2nd Workshop on Medical Robotics, Heidelberg, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  14. V. Golovin, A. Samorukov, The New Method of Apparatus Massage, protected by a Russian patent No 2145833, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  15. A. De Luca, C. Manes, “Hybrid Force/Position Control for Robot in Contact with Dynamic Environment”, Proc. Robot Control SYROCO, Vienna, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Vukobratovic, M., Potkonjak, V., Matijevic, V. (2003). New Trends in Contact Tasks. In: Dynamics of Robots with Contact Tasks. International Series on Microprocessor-Based and Intelligent Systems Engineering, vol 26. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-0397-0_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-0397-0_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-6515-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-017-0397-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics