Abstract
The model of educational reconstruction has proven a useful frame for developing instructional units, especially, for integrating empirical research on teaching and learning and instructional development. The model allows bringing issues of science content structure into balance with educational issues. Processes of educational reconstruction of a new topic, namely nonlinear physics and self-organization are presented. In cooperation with a group of experienced teachers we developed a teaching sequence and evaluated it in a real school setting. Our empirical data provide insight into the difficulties teachers experience in reconstructing a new scientific topic, how these teachers transform their reconstructed subject matter structure into an appropriate content structure for instruction, and into the students learning processes towards understanding nonlinear systems.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Argyris, J., Faust, G. & Haase, M. (1994). Die Erforschung des Chaos [Researching Chaos]. Wiesbaden: Vieweg.
Duit, R. (2001). Educational Reconstruction: Science Subject Matter and Educational Issues in Harmony — Research and Development Intimately Linked. In: Psillos, D. et al. (Eds.), Science Education Research in the Knowledge Based Society (pp. 227–229). Proceedings of the third international conference of ESERA.
Duit, R. & Komorek, M. (1997). Understanding the basic ideas of chaos-theory in a study of limited predictability. Internationaljournal of Science Education, 19, S. 247–264.
Duit, R., Roth, W.-M., Komorek, M., & Wilbers, J. (1998). Conceptual change cum discourse analysis to understand cognition in a unit on chaotic systems: Towards an integrative perspective on learning in science. Internationaljournal of Science Education 20(9), 1059–1073.
Duit, R., Roth, W.-M., Komorek, M. & Wilbers, J. (2001). Fostering conceptual change by analogies — between Scylla and Charybdis. Learning and Instruction, 11, 283–303.
Duit, R., Komorek, M. & Wilbers, J. (1997). Studies on educational reconstruction of chaos theory. Research in Science Education 3, Issue 27, 339–357.
Huber, G. L. (1998). Kooperation von Lehrkräften: Kooperatives Lernen kooperativ lernen [Cooperation of teachers: to learn cooperative learning in a cooperative way]. Modulares Material zum BLK-Pro- gramm “Effizienzsteigerung im naturwissenschaftlichen Unterricht”, http://blk.mat.uni-bayreuth.de/blk/material/ipn.html
Kanitscheider, B. (1994). Philosophische Reflexionen über Chaos und Ordnung [Philosophical ideas about chaos and order]. In: H.-O. Peitgen, H. Jürgens & D. Saupe. Chaos — Bausteine der Ordnung. Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta, S. 1–33.
Kattmann, U., Duit, R., Gropengießer, H., & Komorek, M. (1997). Das Modell der Didaktischen Rekonstruktion — Ein theoretischer Rahmen für naturwissenschaftsdidaktische Forschung und Entwicklung [The model of educational reconstruction — A theoretical frame for science education research and development]. Zeitschrift fur Didaktik der Naturwissenschaften ZfDN 3, Issue 3, 3–18.
Komorek, M. (1999). Lernprozessstudie zum deterministischen Chaos [Learning process study in the field of deterministic chaos]. Zeitschrift für Didaktik der Naturwissenschaften ZfDN 3(5), 3–22.
Komorek, M., Duit, R., Bücker, N. & Naujack, B. (2001). Learning process studies in the field of fractals. In: Behrendt, H., Dahncke, H., Duit, R., Gräber, W., Komorek, M., Kross, A. & Reiska, P. (Eds.) Research in Science Education — Past, Present, and Future (pp. 95–100). Dordrecht (The Netherlands): Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Küppers, G. (Hrsg.), (1996). Chaos und Ordnung — Formen der Selbstorganisation in Natur und Gesellschaft [Chos and order — Kinds of self-organization in nature and society]. Stuttgart: Reclam.
Lijnse, P. (1995). “Developmental research” as a way to an empirically based “didactical structure” of science. Science Education, 79, 189–199.
Schuster, H. G. (1989). Deterministic Chaos. Weinheim: Physik Verlag.
Steffe, L., & D’Ambrosio, B. (1996). Using teaching experiments to understand students’ mathematics. In: Treagust, D., Duit, R. & Fraser, B. (Eds.): Improving teaching and learning in science and mathematics (pp. 65–76). New York: Teacher College Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2003 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Komorek, M., Stavrou, D., Duit, R. (2003). Nonlinear Physics in Upper Physics Classes: Educational Reconstruction as a Frame for Development and Research in a Study of Teaching and Learning Basic Ideas of Nonlinearity. In: Psillos, D., Kariotoglou, P., Tselfes, V., Hatzikraniotis, E., Fassoulopoulos, G., Kallery, M. (eds) Science Education Research in the Knowledge-Based Society. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-0165-5_29
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-0165-5_29
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-6337-3
Online ISBN: 978-94-017-0165-5
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive