Advertisement

Analogical Transfer: Processes and Individual Differences

  • Laura R. Novick
Chapter
Part of the Synthese Library book series (SYLI, volume 197)

Abstract

How would you attempt to solve a math, logic, or puzzle problem? If the problem were to find the area of a circle, you might retrieve a memorized formula and plug in the appropriate numbers. For many problems, however, you will not have a pre-stored solution procedure in memory, and you will have to use the information presented, along with your knowledge of mathematical facts and general problem solving heuristics, to construct a new solution procedure. Alternatively, you could try to think of an analogous problem solved in the past. If your search for such a problem is successful, you may be able to adapt the old solution procedure for use with the new problem. This is an example of analogical transfer.

Keywords

Solution Procedure Problem Solver Negative Transfer Target Problem Positive Transfer 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adelson, B. (1981), ‘Problem solving and the development of abstract categories in programming languages’, Memory and Cognitio. ,422–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adelson, B. (1984), ‘When novices surpass experts: The difficulty of a task may increase with expertise’, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognitio. 1., 483–495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ahlström, K-G. (1961), Transfer and Communality: An Experimental Study of Learnin., Stockholm: Almquist &ampl; Wiksell.Google Scholar
  4. Brown, A. L., Bransford, J. D., Ferrara, R. A., and Campione, J. C. (1983), ‘Learning, remembering, and understanding’, in P. H. Mussen (ed.), Handbook of Child Psycholog. (Fourth Edition): Vol. Ill Cognitive Development, NY: John Wiley & Sons, pp. 77–166.Google Scholar
  5. Brown, A. L., Kane, M. J., and Echols, C. H. (1986), ‘Young children’s mental models determine analogical transfer across problems with a common goal structure’, Cognitive Developmen. , 103–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Carbonell, J. G. (1983), ‘Learning by analogy: Formulating and generalizing plans from past experience’, in R. S. Michalski, J. G. Carbonell, and T. M. Mitchell (eds.), Machine Learning: An Artificial Intelligence Approac., Palo Alto, CA: Tioga Publishing Co, pp. 137–162.Google Scholar
  7. Chi, M. T. H., Feltovich, P. J., and Glaser, R. (1981), ‘Categorization and representation of physics problems by experts and novices’, Cognitive Scienc. ,121–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Collins, A. M. and Loftus, E. F. (1975), ‘A spreading activation theory of semantic processing’, Psychological Revie. 8.,407–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Detterman, D. K. and Sternberg, R. J. (eds.), (1982), How and How Much Can Intelligence Be Increase., Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corp.Google Scholar
  10. Duncker, K. (1945), ‘On problem-solving’, Psychological Monograph. 5. (Whole No. 270).Google Scholar
  11. Falkenhainer, B., Forbus, K. D., and Gentner, D. (1986), ‘The structure-mapping engine’, Proceedings of AAAI-8. (Vol. ), 272–277.Google Scholar
  12. Gagné, R. M. (1970), The Conditions of Learnin. (2nd. edition), NY: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, Inc.Google Scholar
  13. Gentner, D. (1983), ‘Structure-mapping: A theoretical framework’, Cognitive Scienc. , 155–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gentner, D. and Landers, R. (1985), ‘Analogical reminding: A good match is hard to find’, Proceedings of the International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetic..Google Scholar
  15. Gentner, D. and Toupin, C. (1986), ‘Systematicity and surface similarity in the development of analogy’, Cognitive Scienc. 1.,277–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gick, M. L. and Holyoak, K. J. (1980), ‘Analogical problem solving’, Cognitive Psycholog. 1., 306–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gick, M. L. and Holyoak, K. J. (1983), ‘Schema induction and analogical transfer’, Cognitive Psycholog. 1.,1 – 38.Google Scholar
  18. Hall, J. F. (1966), The Psychology of Learnin., Philadelphia: J. B. Lippincott Company.Google Scholar
  19. Hayes, J. R. and Simon, H. A. (1977), ‘Psychological differences among problem isomorphs’, in N. J. Castellan, D. B. Pisoni, and G. R. Potts (eds.), Cognitive Theor., Vol. 2, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 21–44.Google Scholar
  20. Herrnstein, R. J., Nickerson, R. S., de Sanchez, M., and Swets, J. A. (1986), ‘Teaching thinking skills’, American Psychologis. 4.,1279–1289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Holland, J. H., Holyoak, K. J., Nisbett, R. E., and Thagard, P. R. (1986), Induction: Processes of Inference, Learning, and Discover., Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  22. Holyoak, K. J. (1984), ‘Analogical thinking and human intelligence’, in R. J. Sternberg (ed.), Advances in the Psychology of Human Intelligenc., Vol. 2, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 199–230.Google Scholar
  23. Holyoak, K. J. (1985), ‘The pragmatics of analogical transfer’, in G. H. Bower (ed.), The Psychology of Learning and Motivatio., Vol. 19, NY: Academic Press, pp. 59–87.Google Scholar
  24. Holyoak, K. J., Junn, E. N., and Billman, D. O. (1984), ‘Development of analogical problem-solving skill’, Child Developmen. 5.,2042–2055.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Holyoak, K. J. and Koh, K. (1987), ‘Surface and structural similarity in analogical transfer’, Memory and Cognitio. 1., 332–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kay, D. S. and Black, J. B. (1985), ‘The evolution of knowledge representations with increasing expertise in using systems’, Proceedings of the Seventh Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Societ., pp. 140–149.Google Scholar
  27. Luchins, A. (1942), ‘Mechanization in problem solving’, Psychological Monograph. 5. (No. 248).Google Scholar
  28. Luchins, A. and Luchins, E. (1950), ‘New experimental attempts at preventing mechanization in problem solving’, Journal of Genetic Psycholog. 4., 279–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Luger, G. F. and Bauer, M. A. (1978), ‘Transfer effects in isomorphic problem situations’, A eta Psychologic. 4.,121–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Maier, N. (1930), ‘Reasoning in humans. I. On direction’, Journal of Comparative Psycholog. 1.,15–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Maier, N. (1931), ‘Reasoning in humans. II. The solution of a problem and its appearance in consciousness’, Journal of Comparative Psycholog. 1.,181–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Novick, L. R. (1986), Analogical Transfer in Expert and Novice Problem Solver., Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.Google Scholar
  33. Novick, L. R. (in press), ‘Analogical transfer, problem similarity, and expertise’, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognitio..Google Scholar
  34. Osgood, C. E. (1949), ‘The similarity paradox in human learning: A resolution’, Psychological Revie. 5., 132–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Perfetto, G. A., Bransford, J. D., and Franks, J. J. (1983), ‘Constraints on access in a problem solving context’, Memory and Cognitio. 1., 24–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Pólya, G. (1945), How To Solve It, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Ross, B. H. (1984), ‘Remindings and their effects in learning a cognitive skill’, Cognitive Psycholog. 1., 371–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Ross, B. H. (1987), ‘This is like that: The use of earlier problems and the separation of similarity effects’, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognitio. 1., 629–639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Ross, B. H. and Sofka, M. D. (1986), Remindings: Noticing, Remembering and Using Specific Knowledge of Earlier Problems, Unpublished manuscrip., University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.Google Scholar
  40. Schank, R. C. (1982), Dynamic Memory: A Theory of Reminding and Learning in Computers and Peopl., NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  41. Schiano, D., Cooper, L. A., and Glaser, R. (1984), Aptitude-Related Differences in Strategies for the Representation and Solution of Standardized Figurai Analogy Problem., Unpublished manuscript, NIE Milestone Report, Learning, Research, and Development Center, Pittsburgh, PA.Google Scholar
  42. Schoenfeld, A. H. and Herrmann, D. J. (1982), ‘Problem perception and knowledge structure in expert and novice mathematical problem solvers’, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognitio. , 484–494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Silver, E. A. (1979), ‘Student perceptions of relatedness among mathematical verbal problems’, Journal for Research in Mathematics Educatio. 1.,195–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Silver, E. A. (1981), ‘Recall of mathematical problem information: Solving related problems’, Journal for Research in Mathematics Educatio. 1., 54–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Sweller, J. (1980), ‘Transfer effects in a problem solving context’, Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psycholog. 3., 233–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Sweller, J. and Gee, W. (1978), ‘Einstellung, the sequence effect, and hypothesis theory’, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memor. , 513–526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Thorndike, E. L. (1903), Educational Psycholog., NY: Lemcke and Buechner.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Volbrecht, V. J. and Schwartz, M. (1979), ‘Transfer effects in a deductive reasoning problem’, Bulletin of the Psychonomie Societ. 1., 347–350.Google Scholar
  49. Weisberg, R., DiCamillo, M., and Phillips, D. (1978), ‘Transferring old associations to new situations: A nonautomatic process’, Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavio. 1., 219–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Wesman, A. G. (1945), A Study of Transfer of Training from High School Subjects to Intelligenc., NY: Bureau of Publications, Teacher’s College, Columbia University.Google Scholar
  51. Wickelgren, W. A. (1974), How to Solve Problem., San Francisco: W. H. Freeman and Company.Google Scholar
  52. Winston, P. H. (1980), ‘Learning and reasoning by analogy’, Communications of the AC. 2.,689–703.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • Laura R. Novick
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of CaliforniaLos AngelesUSA

Personalised recommendations