Abstract
One’s own mind should be contrasted, one would think, with others’ minds, just as one’s own body contrasts with other people’s bodies. But in our philosophical tradition we have this odd phrase ‘other minds,’ which recurs in discussions of our access to facts about minds. In John Stuart Mill’s presentation1 of the infamous argument from analogy (although he does not characterize the argument as one employing analogy), we find ‘other sentient creatures,’ and ‘other human beings,’ not ‘other minds’. F. H. Bradley has ‘other selves’ and ‘foreign selves,’ and Bertrand Russell has ‘other people’s minds.’ ‘Other minds’ is found in A. J. Ayer, C. I. Lewis, C. D. Broad, John Wisdom, J.L. Austin, Alvin Plantinga, and a host of others.2 My guess is that ‘other minds,’ like Bradley’s ‘other selves’ is a secularization of George Berkeley’s phrase ‘other spirits,’ used when he presents what, as far as I know, is the first version of the infamous argument. He is mainly concerned to present a vindication of that really other super-spirit, the Berkeleyan God, but along the way grants that we know not just ourselves as active spirits, making and unmaking ideas at our pleasure, but, less immediately, ‘other spirits’ who are ‘human agents’. We know of them, Berkeley says ‘by their operations, or the ideas of them, excited in us. I perceive several motions, changes, and combinations of ideas that inform me there are certain particular agents, like myself, which accompany them and concur in their production.’3 Presumably for Berkeley, as before him for Descartes,4 speech is a very important case of such a recognizably spirit-expressing operation, but he would have problems distinguishing the easily intelligible speech of his fellow-Britishers from the less easily decoded language of the ‘author of nature,’ seen or heard as much in ideas which get interpreted as human speech or other expressive human behavior as those which get interpreted as animal, vegetable or mineral changes.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Anscombe, E. (1981), ‘The First Person’in Metaphysics and the Philosophy of Mind: Collected Philosophical Papers, vol. II (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1981).
Austin, J.L. (1961), Philosophical Papers (Oxford).
Baier, A. (1977), ‘The Intentionality of Intentions,’ Review of Metaphysics (March).
Baier, A. (1986), Postures of the Mind (University of Minnesota Press, 1985&Methuen Press).
Baier, A. (forthcoming), ‘The Vital but Dangerous Art of Ignoring: Selective Attention and Self Deception,’ Philosophy East and West.
Berkeley, G. Principles of Human Knowledge.
Broad, CD. (1937), The Mind and Its Place in Nature (Routledge&Kegan Paul).
Davidson D. (1987), ‘Knowing One’s Own Mind,’ APA Proceedings and Addresses, 60.
Descartes, R. Meditations on First Philosophy.
Descartes, R. Discourse on the Method.
Descartes, R. (1984) The Philosophical Writings of Descartes, vol. II, trans. J. Cottingham, R. Stoothoff, D. Murdoch (Cambridge University Press).
Hume, D. A Treatise of Human Nature, L. A. Selby-Bigge and P. H. Nidditch, eds. (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1978).
Fichte, Sämmliche Werke.
James, W. (1901), Principles of Psychology 11 (London).
Locke, J. Essay on Human Understanding.
de Mandiargues, A.P. (1969), The Margin, translated from the French by R. Howard (New York: Grove Press). (Winner in 1967 of the Prix Goncourt.)
Mill, J.S. Examination of Sir William Hamilton’s Philosophy.
Piper, A. (1988), ‘Pseudorationality’, in Perspectives on Self Deception, ed. B. P. McLaughlin and A. O. Rorty (University of California Press), pp. 297–323.
Reid, T. Essays on the Intellectual Powers of Man.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1994 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Baier, A.C. (1994). How To Get To Know One’s Own Mind: Some Simple Ways. In: Michael, M., O’Leary-Hawthorne, J. (eds) Philosophy in Mind. Philosophical Studies Series, vol 60. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-1008-2_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-1008-2_6
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-010-4438-7
Online ISBN: 978-94-011-1008-2
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive