Skip to main content

Implications of studies of inherited predisposition for prevention and treatment

  • Chapter
The Genetics of Cancer

Part of the book series: Cancer Biology and Medicine ((CABM,volume 4))

  • 93 Accesses

Abstract

At one extreme, the reaction to identification of constitutional genetic factors increasing cancer susceptibility is to advocate ‘gene therapy’, meaning replacement of the mutant gene with a normal copy. While this would have obvious attractions, everything that is known about the practicalities of gene therapy suggests that hereditary cancer will be one of the last areas where it will find a place. Even assuming that removal of the inherited mutation is unnecessary (and this would probably be a false assumption in certain instances, such as MEN 2 or Li-Fraumeni syndrome), introduction of any new gene construct is limited by the efficiency of the transfection step. Under the most favourable conditions, using a retroviral vector and being prepared to accept insertion of multiple copies of the construct into some cells, the efficiency of in-vivo transfection never reaches 100%1,2. In the case of a cancer, escapc of even a tiny number of cells from genetic ‘correction’ would defeat the purpose of the therapy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Friedman T. A brief history of gene therapy. Nature Genet. 1992; 2: 93–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Marrouche Y, Favrot MC. Meeting report: retroviral gene therapy and its application in oncohaematology. Hum Gene Ther. 1992; 3: 285–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. HMSO. Report of the committee on ethics of gene therapy. (The Clothier Report). January 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Wivel NA, Walters L. Germ-line gene modification and disease prevention: some medical and ethical perspectives. Science. 1993; 262: 533–537.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Kelly PT. Counselling needs of women with a maternal history of breast cancer. Patient Counselling Health Educ. 1980; 3: 118–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kash KM, Holland JC, Halper MS, Miller DG. Psychological distress and surveillance behaviors of women with a family history of breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1992; 84: 24–30.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Lerman C, Daly M, Sands C, et al. Mammography adherence and psychological distress among women at risk for breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1993; 85: 1074–1080.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Evans DGR, Burnell LD, Hop wood P, Howell A. Perception of risk in women with a family history of breast cancer. Br J Cancer. 1993; 67: 612–614.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Anderson EDC, Steel CM, Smyth E, Cull A. Knowledge, attitudes, health-related behaviour and emotional status of women with a family history of breast cancer. Paper presented at 3rd Nottingham International Breast Cancer Conference, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ponder BAJ. Inherited predisposition to cancer. Trends Genet. 1990; 6: 213–218.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Tulinius H, Egilsson V, Olafsdottir GH, Sigvaldson H. Risk of prostate, ovarian and endometrial cancer among relatives of women with breast cancer. Br Med J. 1992: 305: 855–857.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Nuffield Council on Bioethics. Genetic screening: ethical issues. London: Nuffield Council on Bioethics; 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Steel CM, Ed and UK Cancer Family Study Group. Seminar on ethical issues arising from molecular studies in human genetic disease. Dis Markers. 1992; 10: 185–228.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Wolf RC, Smith AD, Forman D. Metabolic polymorphisms in carcinogen metabolising enzymes and cancer susceptibility. Br Med Bull. 1994; 50: 718–731.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Newton JA. Genetics of melanoma. Br Med Bull. 1994; 50: 677–687.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Marks R. Primary prevention of skin cancer. Br Med J. 1994; 309: 285–286.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Birch JM. Familial cancer syndromes and clusters. Br Med Bull. 1994; 50: 624–639.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Taylor AMR, McConville CM, Byrd PJ. Cancer and DNA processing disorders. Br Med Bull. 1994; 50: 708–717.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Wynder EL. Primary prevention of cancer: planning and policy considerations. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1991; 83: 475–479.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Adami H-O, Adams G, Boyle P, et al. Breast cancer etiology. Int J Cancer Suppl. 1990; 5: 22–39.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Harris JR, Lippman ME, Veronesi U, Willett W. Breast cancer (Part 1). N Engl J Med. 1992; 327: 319–328.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Ewertz M, Duffy SW. Incidence of female breast cancer in relation to prevalence and risk factors in Denmark. Int J Cancer. 1994; 56: 783–787.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Narod SA. Genetics of breast and ovarian cancer. Br Med Bull. 1994; 50: 656–676.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Clayton JA. Segregation analysis of familial breast cancer ascertained from a consecutive series of Scottish probands. [Paper in preparation].

    Google Scholar 

  25. Brinton LA, Hoover R, Fraumeni JF. Interaction of familial and hormonal risk factors for breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1982; 69: 817–822.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Evans DGR, Fentiman IS, McPherson K, et al. Familial breast cancer. Br Med J. 1994; 308: 183–187.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Steinberg KK, Thacker SB, Smith SJ, et al. A meta-analysis of the effect of oestrogen replacement therapy on the risk of breast cancer. JAMA. 1991; 265: 1985–1990.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. La Vecchia C. Oral contraceptives and breast cancer. Breast. 1992; 2: 76–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Eckhardt S, Badellino F, Murphy GP. UICC meeting on breast cancer screening in pre-menopausal women in developed countries. Int J Cancer. 1994; 56:1–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Rosenberg L, Palmer JR, Zauber AG, et al. A hypothesis: nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs reduce the incidence of large-bowel cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1992; 83: 355–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Cunningham C, Dunlop MG. Genetics of colorectal cancer. Br Med Bull. 1994; 50: 640–655.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Nayfield SG, Karp JE, Ford LG, Dorr A, Kramer BS. Potential role of tamoxifen in prevention of breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1991; 83: 1450–1459.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Fugh-Berman A, Epstein S. Tamoxifen: disease prevention or disease substitution? Lancet. 1992; 340: 1143–1144.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Morrow M, Jordan VC. Risk factors and the prevention of breast cancer with tamoxifen. Cancer Surveys. 1993; 18: 211–229.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Henderson BE, Ross RK, Pike MC. Hormonal chemoprevention of cancer in women. Science. 1993; 259: 633–638.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Evans DGR, Donnai D, Ribiero G, Warrell D. Ovarian cancer family and prophylactic choices. J Med Genet. 1992; 29: 416–418.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Milner B, Allan L, Kelly K, et al. Linkage studies with 17q and 18q markers in a breast/ovarian cancer family. Am J Hum Genet. 1993; 52: 761–766.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Narod SA, Lynch HT, Conway T, et al. The incidence of cancer is increasing in a large family with hereditary breast-ovarian cancer. Lancet. 1993; 341: 1101–1102.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Lynch HT, Watson P, Conway TA, et al. Pilot study of DNA screening for breast/ovarian cancer susceptibility based on linked markers. Arch Int Med. 1993; 153: 1979–1987.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Harris JR, Lippman ME, Veronesi U, Willett W. Breast cancer (Part 3). N Engl J Med. 1992; 327: 473–480.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Piver MS, Jishi MF, Tsukada Y, Nava G. Primary peritoneal carcinoma after prophylactic oophorectomy in women with a family history of ovarian cancer. Cancer. 1993; 71: 2751–2755.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Selby JV. Disease prevention: screening sigmoidoscopy for colorectal cancer. Lancet. 1993; 341: 728–729.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Rees GJG. Cancer treatment: deciding what we can afford. Br Med J. 1991; 302: 797–800.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Anderson TJ. Genesis and source of breast cancer. Br Med Bull. 1991; 47: 305–318.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Piver MS, Baker TR, Jishi MF, et al. Familial ovarian cancer. A report of 658 families from the Gilda Radner Familial Ovarian Cancer Registry 1981–1991. Cancer. 1993; 71: 582–588.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Carter BS, Steinberg GD, Beaty TH, Childs B, Walsh PC. Familial risk factors for prostate cancer. Cancer Surveys. 1991; 11: 5–13.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Bourne TH, Campbell S, Reynolds KM, et al. Screening for early familial ovarian cancer with transvaginal ultrasonography and colour flow imaging. Br Med J. 1993; 306: 1025–1029.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Catalona WJ, Smith DS, Ratliff TL, et al. Measurement of prostate-specific antigen as a screening test for prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 1991: 324: 1156–1161.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Siddall R. Time to screen for prostate cancer? New Scientist. 1993; 137: 27–30.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Ponder BAJ. Setting up and running a familial cancer clinic. Br Med Bull. 1994; 50: 732–745.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Ransohoff DF, Lang CA, Kuo HS. Colonoscopic surveillance after polypectomy: considerations of cost-effectiveness. Ann Intern Med. 1991; 114: 177–182.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Law J. Variations in individual radiation dose in a breast screening programme and consequences for the balance between associated risk and benefit. Br J Radiol. 1993; 66: 691–698.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Day NE. Screening for breast cancer. Br Med Bull. 1991; 47: 400–415.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Ellwood JM, Cox B, Richardson AK. The effectiveness of breast screening by mammography in younger women. Online J Curr Clin Trials. (Serial online). 1993; 2: Doc NR 32.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Miller AB, Baines CJ, To T, Wall C. Canadian National Breast Screening Study: breast cancer detection and death rates among women aged 40 to 49 years. Can Med Assoc J. 1992; 147: 1459–1476.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Stacey-Clear A, McCarthy HA, Hall DA, et al. Breast cancer survival among women under age 50: is mammography detrimental? Lancet. 1992; 340: 991–994.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Nystrom L, Rutqvist LE, Wall S, et al. Breast cancer screening with mammography: overview of Swedish randomised trials. Lancet. 1993; 341: 973–978.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Fletcher SW, Black W, Harris R, et al. Report of the International Workshop on Screening for Breast Cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1993; 85: 1644–1656.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Easton DF, Bishop DT, Ford D, Crockford GP, and the Breast Cancer Linkage Cosortium. Genetic linkage analysis in familial breast and ovarian cancer: results from 214 families. Am J Hum Genet. 1993; 52: 678–701.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Kerilkowske K, Grady D, Barclay J, et al. Positive value of screening mammography by age and family history of breast cancer. JAMA. 1993; 270: 2444–2450.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Rustin GJS. Impact of tumour marker measurements upon management of patients with carcinoma of the ovary. Dis Markers. 1991; 9: 153–158.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. Scott IV. Advantages and disadvantages of randomised controlled trials of ovarian cancer screening. In: Sharp F, Mason P, Creasman G eds. Ovarian Cancer 2. London: Chapman & Hall; 1992: 277–287.

    Google Scholar 

  63. Bast R Jr, Xu S, Woolas R, et al. Complementary and co-ordinate markers for detection of epithelial ovarian cancer. In: Sharp F, Mason P, Blackett A, Berek J eds. Ovarian cancer 3. London: Chapman & Hall; 1994: 189–192.

    Google Scholar 

  64. Gagel RF, Tashijan AH Jr, Cummings T, et al. The clinical outcome of prospective screening for multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2a. N Engl J Med. 1988; 318: 478–484.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. Mulligan LM, Kwok JBJ, Healey CS, et al. Germ-line mutations of the RET proto-oncogene in multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2A. Nature. 1993; 363: 458–460.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  66. Olschwang S, Tiret A, Laurent-Puig P, et al. Restriction of ocular fundus lesions to a specific subgroup of FAP mutations in adenomatous polyposis coli. Cell. 1993; 75: 959–968.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  67. Claus EB, Risch N, Thompson WD. Age of onset as an indicator of familial risk of breast cancer. Am J Epidemiol. 1990; 131: 961–972.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  68. Houlston RS, McCarter E, Parbhoo S, Scurr JH, Slack J. Family history and risk of breast cancer. J Med Genet. 1992; 29: 154–157.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  69. Bishop DT. The importance of inherited predisposition to cancer. Cancer Topics. 1991; 8: 66–68.

    Google Scholar 

  70. Easton D, Ford D, Peto J. Inherited susceptibility to breast cancer. Cancer Surveys. 1993; 18: 95–113.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  71. Swanson GM. Breast cancer risk estimation: a translational statistic for communication to the public. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1993; 85: 848–897.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  72. de Wit ACD, Meijers-Heijboer EJ, Tibben A, et al. Effect on a Dutch family of predictive DNA testing for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer. Lancet. 1994; 344: 197.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Li FP, Garber J, Friend SH, et al. Recommendations on predictive testing for germ line p53 mutations among cancer-prone individuals. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1992; 84: 1156–1160.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  74. Wu Y, Giger ML, Doi K, et. al. Artificial neural networks in mammography. Radiology. 1993; 187: 81–87.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  75. Workman P, Harris A. Translating advances in molecular oncology into improved therapy: new targets for drug discovery. Cancer Topics. 1993; 9: 97–99.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1995 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Steel, C.M. (1995). Implications of studies of inherited predisposition for prevention and treatment. In: Ponder, B.A.J., Waring, M.J. (eds) The Genetics of Cancer. Cancer Biology and Medicine, vol 4. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-0677-1_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-0677-1_9

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-4294-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-0677-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics