Abstract
At one extreme, the reaction to identification of constitutional genetic factors increasing cancer susceptibility is to advocate ‘gene therapy’, meaning replacement of the mutant gene with a normal copy. While this would have obvious attractions, everything that is known about the practicalities of gene therapy suggests that hereditary cancer will be one of the last areas where it will find a place. Even assuming that removal of the inherited mutation is unnecessary (and this would probably be a false assumption in certain instances, such as MEN 2 or Li-Fraumeni syndrome), introduction of any new gene construct is limited by the efficiency of the transfection step. Under the most favourable conditions, using a retroviral vector and being prepared to accept insertion of multiple copies of the construct into some cells, the efficiency of in-vivo transfection never reaches 100%1,2. In the case of a cancer, escapc of even a tiny number of cells from genetic ‘correction’ would defeat the purpose of the therapy.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Friedman T. A brief history of gene therapy. Nature Genet. 1992; 2: 93–98.
Marrouche Y, Favrot MC. Meeting report: retroviral gene therapy and its application in oncohaematology. Hum Gene Ther. 1992; 3: 285–291.
HMSO. Report of the committee on ethics of gene therapy. (The Clothier Report). January 1992.
Wivel NA, Walters L. Germ-line gene modification and disease prevention: some medical and ethical perspectives. Science. 1993; 262: 533–537.
Kelly PT. Counselling needs of women with a maternal history of breast cancer. Patient Counselling Health Educ. 1980; 3: 118–124.
Kash KM, Holland JC, Halper MS, Miller DG. Psychological distress and surveillance behaviors of women with a family history of breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1992; 84: 24–30.
Lerman C, Daly M, Sands C, et al. Mammography adherence and psychological distress among women at risk for breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1993; 85: 1074–1080.
Evans DGR, Burnell LD, Hop wood P, Howell A. Perception of risk in women with a family history of breast cancer. Br J Cancer. 1993; 67: 612–614.
Anderson EDC, Steel CM, Smyth E, Cull A. Knowledge, attitudes, health-related behaviour and emotional status of women with a family history of breast cancer. Paper presented at 3rd Nottingham International Breast Cancer Conference, 1993.
Ponder BAJ. Inherited predisposition to cancer. Trends Genet. 1990; 6: 213–218.
Tulinius H, Egilsson V, Olafsdottir GH, Sigvaldson H. Risk of prostate, ovarian and endometrial cancer among relatives of women with breast cancer. Br Med J. 1992: 305: 855–857.
Nuffield Council on Bioethics. Genetic screening: ethical issues. London: Nuffield Council on Bioethics; 1993.
Steel CM, Ed and UK Cancer Family Study Group. Seminar on ethical issues arising from molecular studies in human genetic disease. Dis Markers. 1992; 10: 185–228.
Wolf RC, Smith AD, Forman D. Metabolic polymorphisms in carcinogen metabolising enzymes and cancer susceptibility. Br Med Bull. 1994; 50: 718–731.
Newton JA. Genetics of melanoma. Br Med Bull. 1994; 50: 677–687.
Marks R. Primary prevention of skin cancer. Br Med J. 1994; 309: 285–286.
Birch JM. Familial cancer syndromes and clusters. Br Med Bull. 1994; 50: 624–639.
Taylor AMR, McConville CM, Byrd PJ. Cancer and DNA processing disorders. Br Med Bull. 1994; 50: 708–717.
Wynder EL. Primary prevention of cancer: planning and policy considerations. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1991; 83: 475–479.
Adami H-O, Adams G, Boyle P, et al. Breast cancer etiology. Int J Cancer Suppl. 1990; 5: 22–39.
Harris JR, Lippman ME, Veronesi U, Willett W. Breast cancer (Part 1). N Engl J Med. 1992; 327: 319–328.
Ewertz M, Duffy SW. Incidence of female breast cancer in relation to prevalence and risk factors in Denmark. Int J Cancer. 1994; 56: 783–787.
Narod SA. Genetics of breast and ovarian cancer. Br Med Bull. 1994; 50: 656–676.
Clayton JA. Segregation analysis of familial breast cancer ascertained from a consecutive series of Scottish probands. [Paper in preparation].
Brinton LA, Hoover R, Fraumeni JF. Interaction of familial and hormonal risk factors for breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1982; 69: 817–822.
Evans DGR, Fentiman IS, McPherson K, et al. Familial breast cancer. Br Med J. 1994; 308: 183–187.
Steinberg KK, Thacker SB, Smith SJ, et al. A meta-analysis of the effect of oestrogen replacement therapy on the risk of breast cancer. JAMA. 1991; 265: 1985–1990.
La Vecchia C. Oral contraceptives and breast cancer. Breast. 1992; 2: 76–81.
Eckhardt S, Badellino F, Murphy GP. UICC meeting on breast cancer screening in pre-menopausal women in developed countries. Int J Cancer. 1994; 56:1–5.
Rosenberg L, Palmer JR, Zauber AG, et al. A hypothesis: nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs reduce the incidence of large-bowel cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1992; 83: 355–358.
Cunningham C, Dunlop MG. Genetics of colorectal cancer. Br Med Bull. 1994; 50: 640–655.
Nayfield SG, Karp JE, Ford LG, Dorr A, Kramer BS. Potential role of tamoxifen in prevention of breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1991; 83: 1450–1459.
Fugh-Berman A, Epstein S. Tamoxifen: disease prevention or disease substitution? Lancet. 1992; 340: 1143–1144.
Morrow M, Jordan VC. Risk factors and the prevention of breast cancer with tamoxifen. Cancer Surveys. 1993; 18: 211–229.
Henderson BE, Ross RK, Pike MC. Hormonal chemoprevention of cancer in women. Science. 1993; 259: 633–638.
Evans DGR, Donnai D, Ribiero G, Warrell D. Ovarian cancer family and prophylactic choices. J Med Genet. 1992; 29: 416–418.
Milner B, Allan L, Kelly K, et al. Linkage studies with 17q and 18q markers in a breast/ovarian cancer family. Am J Hum Genet. 1993; 52: 761–766.
Narod SA, Lynch HT, Conway T, et al. The incidence of cancer is increasing in a large family with hereditary breast-ovarian cancer. Lancet. 1993; 341: 1101–1102.
Lynch HT, Watson P, Conway TA, et al. Pilot study of DNA screening for breast/ovarian cancer susceptibility based on linked markers. Arch Int Med. 1993; 153: 1979–1987.
Harris JR, Lippman ME, Veronesi U, Willett W. Breast cancer (Part 3). N Engl J Med. 1992; 327: 473–480.
Piver MS, Jishi MF, Tsukada Y, Nava G. Primary peritoneal carcinoma after prophylactic oophorectomy in women with a family history of ovarian cancer. Cancer. 1993; 71: 2751–2755.
Selby JV. Disease prevention: screening sigmoidoscopy for colorectal cancer. Lancet. 1993; 341: 728–729.
Rees GJG. Cancer treatment: deciding what we can afford. Br Med J. 1991; 302: 797–800.
Anderson TJ. Genesis and source of breast cancer. Br Med Bull. 1991; 47: 305–318.
Piver MS, Baker TR, Jishi MF, et al. Familial ovarian cancer. A report of 658 families from the Gilda Radner Familial Ovarian Cancer Registry 1981–1991. Cancer. 1993; 71: 582–588.
Carter BS, Steinberg GD, Beaty TH, Childs B, Walsh PC. Familial risk factors for prostate cancer. Cancer Surveys. 1991; 11: 5–13.
Bourne TH, Campbell S, Reynolds KM, et al. Screening for early familial ovarian cancer with transvaginal ultrasonography and colour flow imaging. Br Med J. 1993; 306: 1025–1029.
Catalona WJ, Smith DS, Ratliff TL, et al. Measurement of prostate-specific antigen as a screening test for prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 1991: 324: 1156–1161.
Siddall R. Time to screen for prostate cancer? New Scientist. 1993; 137: 27–30.
Ponder BAJ. Setting up and running a familial cancer clinic. Br Med Bull. 1994; 50: 732–745.
Ransohoff DF, Lang CA, Kuo HS. Colonoscopic surveillance after polypectomy: considerations of cost-effectiveness. Ann Intern Med. 1991; 114: 177–182.
Law J. Variations in individual radiation dose in a breast screening programme and consequences for the balance between associated risk and benefit. Br J Radiol. 1993; 66: 691–698.
Day NE. Screening for breast cancer. Br Med Bull. 1991; 47: 400–415.
Ellwood JM, Cox B, Richardson AK. The effectiveness of breast screening by mammography in younger women. Online J Curr Clin Trials. (Serial online). 1993; 2: Doc NR 32.
Miller AB, Baines CJ, To T, Wall C. Canadian National Breast Screening Study: breast cancer detection and death rates among women aged 40 to 49 years. Can Med Assoc J. 1992; 147: 1459–1476.
Stacey-Clear A, McCarthy HA, Hall DA, et al. Breast cancer survival among women under age 50: is mammography detrimental? Lancet. 1992; 340: 991–994.
Nystrom L, Rutqvist LE, Wall S, et al. Breast cancer screening with mammography: overview of Swedish randomised trials. Lancet. 1993; 341: 973–978.
Fletcher SW, Black W, Harris R, et al. Report of the International Workshop on Screening for Breast Cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1993; 85: 1644–1656.
Easton DF, Bishop DT, Ford D, Crockford GP, and the Breast Cancer Linkage Cosortium. Genetic linkage analysis in familial breast and ovarian cancer: results from 214 families. Am J Hum Genet. 1993; 52: 678–701.
Kerilkowske K, Grady D, Barclay J, et al. Positive value of screening mammography by age and family history of breast cancer. JAMA. 1993; 270: 2444–2450.
Rustin GJS. Impact of tumour marker measurements upon management of patients with carcinoma of the ovary. Dis Markers. 1991; 9: 153–158.
Scott IV. Advantages and disadvantages of randomised controlled trials of ovarian cancer screening. In: Sharp F, Mason P, Creasman G eds. Ovarian Cancer 2. London: Chapman & Hall; 1992: 277–287.
Bast R Jr, Xu S, Woolas R, et al. Complementary and co-ordinate markers for detection of epithelial ovarian cancer. In: Sharp F, Mason P, Blackett A, Berek J eds. Ovarian cancer 3. London: Chapman & Hall; 1994: 189–192.
Gagel RF, Tashijan AH Jr, Cummings T, et al. The clinical outcome of prospective screening for multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2a. N Engl J Med. 1988; 318: 478–484.
Mulligan LM, Kwok JBJ, Healey CS, et al. Germ-line mutations of the RET proto-oncogene in multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2A. Nature. 1993; 363: 458–460.
Olschwang S, Tiret A, Laurent-Puig P, et al. Restriction of ocular fundus lesions to a specific subgroup of FAP mutations in adenomatous polyposis coli. Cell. 1993; 75: 959–968.
Claus EB, Risch N, Thompson WD. Age of onset as an indicator of familial risk of breast cancer. Am J Epidemiol. 1990; 131: 961–972.
Houlston RS, McCarter E, Parbhoo S, Scurr JH, Slack J. Family history and risk of breast cancer. J Med Genet. 1992; 29: 154–157.
Bishop DT. The importance of inherited predisposition to cancer. Cancer Topics. 1991; 8: 66–68.
Easton D, Ford D, Peto J. Inherited susceptibility to breast cancer. Cancer Surveys. 1993; 18: 95–113.
Swanson GM. Breast cancer risk estimation: a translational statistic for communication to the public. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1993; 85: 848–897.
de Wit ACD, Meijers-Heijboer EJ, Tibben A, et al. Effect on a Dutch family of predictive DNA testing for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer. Lancet. 1994; 344: 197.
Li FP, Garber J, Friend SH, et al. Recommendations on predictive testing for germ line p53 mutations among cancer-prone individuals. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1992; 84: 1156–1160.
Wu Y, Giger ML, Doi K, et. al. Artificial neural networks in mammography. Radiology. 1993; 187: 81–87.
Workman P, Harris A. Translating advances in molecular oncology into improved therapy: new targets for drug discovery. Cancer Topics. 1993; 9: 97–99.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1995 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Steel, C.M. (1995). Implications of studies of inherited predisposition for prevention and treatment. In: Ponder, B.A.J., Waring, M.J. (eds) The Genetics of Cancer. Cancer Biology and Medicine, vol 4. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-0677-1_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-0677-1_9
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-010-4294-9
Online ISBN: 978-94-011-0677-1
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive