Skip to main content

Biological Reductionism and Genic Selectionism

  • Chapter
Sociobiology and Epistemology

Part of the book series: Synthese Library ((SYLI,volume 180))

Abstract

Issues concerning the scope and viability of reductionistic explanations in biology have come recently to be discussed under the rubric of controversies over the “units” or “levels” of selection; that is, over the level or levels at which natural selection is properly said to operate. As critics have pointed out, some of the more a priori defenses of genic selectionism, the view that the sole unit of selection is the gene, have failed to demonstrate that genic selectionism provides an adequate explanatory theory. These same critics have concluded that the context dependence of genic effects due to linkage and interaction, and the resulting misrepresentation of underlying causal processes, are the cause of this deficiency. This is incorrect. Advocates of genic selectionism have not denied interaction at any variety of levels. Furthermore, to press that context dependence is sufficient grounds to impugn the explanatory adequacy of genic selectionism is untenable. Recent biological work on the coevolution of traits and historical controversies over the importance of “linkage effects” on the expression of genes suffice to press the point that context dependence is consistent with retaining lower levels of organization. Controversies over the units or levels of selection will be resolved only with due attention to the details of biological models which purport to explain evolution in terms of forces acting on lower level units and to the substantial methodological problems attendant to applying these models to actual biological systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Axelrod, R. and Hamilton, W. D.: 1981, ‘The Evolution of Cooperation’, Science 211, 1390–1396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bateson, W.: 1913, Problems of Genetics, Yale, New Haven [reproduced, 1979].

    Google Scholar 

  • Beatty, J.: 1980, ‘Optimal-Design Models and the Strategy of Model Building in Evolutionary Biology’, Philosophy of Science 47, 532–561.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brandon, R.: 1978, ‘Adaptation and Evolutionary Theory’, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 9, 181–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burian, R.: 1983, ‘Adaptation’, in M. Grene (ed.), Dimensions of Darwinism, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bridges, C. B.: 1936, ‘The Bar “Gene” a Duplication’, Science 83, 210–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlson, E. A.: 1966, The Gene: A Critical History, W. B. Saunders, Philadelphia and London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Causey, R.: 1977, Unity of Science, D. Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Darwin, C.: 1959, On The Origin of Species. A Facsimile of the First Edition with an Introduction by Ernst Mayr, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawkins, R.: 1976, The Selfish Gene, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawkins, R.: 1982, The Extended Phenotype: The Gene as the Unit of Selection, W. H. Freeman, Oxford and San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobzhansky, T.: 1932, ‘The Baroid Mutation in Drosophila Melanogaster’, Genetics 17, 369–392.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doolittle, W. F. and Sapienza, C.: 1980, ‘Selfish Genes, The Phenotype Paradigm, and Genome Evolution’, Nature 284, 601–603.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, W. D.: 1964, ‘The Genetical Evolution of Social Behavior I and II’, Journal of Theoretical Biology 7, 1–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, W. D.: 1964, ‘The Genetical Evolution of Social Behavior I and II’, Journal of Theoretical Biology 7, 17–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, W. D.: 1975, ‘Innate Social Aptitudes of Man: An Approach to Evolutionary Genetics’, in R. Fox (ed.), Biosocial Anthropology. Malaby Press, London. Reprinted and abridged in R. Brandon and R. Burian (eds.), Genes, Organisms, Populations: Controversies Over the Units of Selection, MIT Press, Cambridge, 1984, pp. 193–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hellman, G. and Thompson, F.: 1975, ‘Physicalism, Ontology, Determinism, and Reduction’, The Journal of Philosophy 72, 551–564.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levins, R.: 1974, ‘The Qualitative Analysis of Partially Specified Systems’, Annals of the New York Academy of Science 231, 123–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewin, R.: 1982, ‘Repeated DNA Still in Search of a Function’, Science 217, 612–623.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewontin, R. C.: 1970, ‘The Units of Selection’, Annual Review of Ecology and Systernatics 1, 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewontin, R. C.: 1974, The Genetic Basis of Evolutionary Change, Columbia University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewontin, R. C.: 1977, ‘Fitness, Survival, and Optimality’, in D. J. Horn, R. Mitchell, and G. R. Stairs (eds.), Analysis of Ecological Systems, State University Press, Columbus, OH, pp. 4–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewontin, R. C.: 1983, Human Diversity, W. H. Freeman, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewontin, R. C. and White, M. J.: 1960, ‘Interaction Between Inversion Polymorphisms of Two Chromosome Pairs in the Grasshopper, Moraba scurra’, Evolution 14, 116–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maynard Smith, J.: 1978, ‘Optimisation Theory in Evolution’, Annual Review of Ecology and Systematic 9, 31–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maynard Smith, J.: 1982, Evolution and the Theory of Games, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maynard Smith, J.: 1983, ‘Game Theory and the Evolution of Cooperation’, in D. S. Bendali (ed.), Evolution from Molecules to Men, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 445–456.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maynard Smith, J.: 1984, ‘Game Theory and the Evolution of Behavior’, The Behavioral and Brain Sciences 7, 95–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayr, E.: 1963, Animal Species and Evolution, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayr, E.: 1975, ‘The Unity of the Genotype’, Biologisches Zentralblatt 94, pp. 377–388; reprinted with a recent preface in R. Brandon and R. Burian (eds.), Genes, Organisms, and Populations, MIT Press, Cambridge, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mills, S. and Beatty, J.: 1979, ‘The Propensity Interpretation of Fitness’, Philosophy of Science 46, 263–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nagel, E.: 1961, The Structure of Science, Harcourt, Brace & World, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orgel, L. and Crick, F.: 1980, ‘Selfish DNA: The Ultimate Parasite’, Nature 284, 604–607.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, R.: 1982, ‘Grades of Organization and the Units of Selection Controversy’, in P. D. Asquith and T. Nickles (eds.), PSA 1982, vol. 1, Philosophy of Science Association, pp. 324–340.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, R.: 1984, ‘Biology and Ideology: The Interpenetration of Science and Politics’, Philosophy of Science 50: pp. 000–000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, R.: (forthcoming), ‘Models and Scientific Explanation’, in a volume edited by G. Dorn and P. Weingartner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, A.: 1978, ‘The Supervenience of Biological Concepts’, Philosophy of Science 46, 263–288.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, A.: 1983, ‘Fitness’, The Journal of Philosophy 80, 457–473.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roughgarden, J.: 1979, Theory of Population Genetics and Evolutionary Ecology: An Introduction, MacMillan, London & New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaffner, K.: 1974, ‘Reductionism in Biology: Prospects and Problems’, in R. S. Cohen et al. (eds.), PSA 1974, D. Reidel, Dordrecht, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sober, E.: 1980, ‘Holism, individualism, and the Units of Selection’, in P. D. Asquith and R. N. Giere (eds.), PSA 1980, Philosophy of Science Association, 1981, pp. 93–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sober, E. and Lewontin, R. C.: 1982, ‘Artifact, Cause and Genic Selection’, Philosophy of Science 49, 157–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sturtevant, A. H.: 1925, ‘The Effects of Unequal Crossing Over at the Bar Locus in Drosophila’, Genetics 10, 117–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sturtevant, A. H. and Morgan, T. H.: 1923, ‘Reverse Mutation of the Bar Gene Correlated with Crossing Over’, Science 57, 746–747.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sturtevant, A. H.: 1965, A History of Genetics, Harper & Row, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trivers, R.: 1971, ‘The Evolution of Reciprocal Altruism’, The Quarterly Review of Biology 46, 35–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, G. C.: 1966, Adaptation and Natural Selection, Princeton University Press, Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, E.: 1975, Sociobiology: The New Synthesis, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wimsatt, W.: 1980a, ‘Reductionist Research Strategies and Their Biases in the Units of Selection Controversy’, in T. Nickles (ed.), Scientific Discovery vol. 2: Case Studies, D. Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wimsatt, W.: 1980b, ‘Units of Selection and the Structure of the Multi-level Genome’, in R. Giere and P. D. Aquith (eds.), PSA 1980, Philosophy of Science Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wimsatt, W.: (in progress), ‘VonBaer’s Law of Development, Generative Entrenchment, and Scientific Change’.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1985 D. Reidel Publishing Company

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Richardson, R.C. (1985). Biological Reductionism and Genic Selectionism. In: Fetzer, J.H. (eds) Sociobiology and Epistemology. Synthese Library, vol 180. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-5370-3_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-5370-3_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-277-2006-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-5370-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics