Advertisement

The Role of Wolff’s Analysis of Judgements in Kant’s Inaugural Dissertation

  • Johan Blok
Chapter
Part of the Logic, Epistemology, and the Unity of Science book series (LEUS, volume 31)

Abstract

The subject and its cognitive faculties play a prominent role in the German philosophy and logic of the eighteenth century, including Wolff and Kant. This is due to the central place they granted to the notion of judgement. Ignoring the details, they considered a judgement to be made when two concepts or representations are united in thought. This aspect, already present in Wolff, comes more to the fore in the philosophy of Kant. Nevertheless, both also adopted a more formal approach to judgements. This chapter shows how both Wolff and Kant seek to combine the epistemological role of the subject with a formal analysis of the notion of judgement. As a result, I defend the claim that the criticism of metaphysics Kant elaborates in his dissertation De mundi sensibilis atque intelligibilis forma et principiis of 1770 relies on a transformation of this formal analysis to the meta-level of the human faculties.

Keywords

Human Faculty Sufficient Ground Epistemological Nature Ontological Difference Metaphysical Claim 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Bibliography

  1. Birken-Bertsch, Hanno. 2006. Subreption und Dialektik bei Kant: Der Begriff des Fehlers der Erschleichung in der Philosophie des 18. Jahrhunderts. Stuttgart: Frommann-Holzboog.Google Scholar
  2. Carson, Emily. 2004. Metaphysics, mathematics and the distinction between the sensible and the intelligible in Kant’s inaugural dissertation. Journal of the History of Philosophy 42(2): 165–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Grier, Michelle. 2001. Kant’s doctrine of transcendental illusion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Guyer, Paul. 1987. Kant and the claims of knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Kant, Immanuel. 1968. Kants Werke: Akademie-Textausgabe. Berlin: Walter De Gruyter.Google Scholar
  6. Kant, Immanuel. 1992. In Theoretical philosophy 1755–1770, ed. David Walford. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Longuenesse, Béatrice. 1998. Kant and the capacity to judge. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Meier, Georg Friedrich. 1752a. Auszug aus der Vernunftlehre. Reprinted in Kant’s Gesammelte Schriften. Vol. XVI. Halle: Gebauer.Google Scholar
  9. Meier, Georg Friedrich. 1752b. Vernunftlehre. Halle: Gebauer.Google Scholar
  10. Wolff, Christian. 1710. Der Anfangs-Gründe aller mathematischen Wissenschafften, vol. I/12. Frankfurt: Renger.Google Scholar
  11. Wolff, Christan. 1965. Vernünftige Gedanken : von den Kräften des menschlichen Verstandes und ihrem richtigen Gebrauche in Erkenntnis der Wahrheit (German Logic). Vol. I/1. Hildesheim: Olms. Translated in: Logic, or rational thoughts on the powers of the human understanding. London: Printed for L. Hawes, W. Clarke, and R. Collins, 1770.Google Scholar
  12. Zammito, John H. 2002. Kant, Herder, and the birth of anthropology. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of PhilosophyUniversity of GroningenDrontenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations