Skip to main content
  • 750 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter introduces the author’s motivation to write this book and illustrates its structure, which refers to the systematic approach to training. It is outlined that the book aims to facilitate the understanding of the task and the target of the job of control room operators in the context of the organisation (needs assessment), and to derive the knowledge and skills required to fulfil the task in order to define training objectives. It is announced that the book develops propositions for how to best acquire the knowledge and skills and to support transfer based on the state-of-the-art research on knowledge and skill acquisition, retention and transfer for complex task work and teamwork tasks. An outlook is provided with respect to the concept of the “Staged Process Control Readiness Training” (SPCRT) as the instructional technique.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Coultas, C. W., Grossman, R., & Salas, E. (2012). Design, delivery, evaluation and transfer of training systems. In G. Salvendy (Ed.), Handbook of human factors and ergonomics (pp. 490–533). Hoboken: Wiley.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Crossman, E. R. F. W. (1974). Automation and skill. In E. Edwards & F. P. Lees (Eds.), The human operator in process control (pp. 1–25). London: Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Endsley, M. R. (1995). Toward a theory of situation awareness in dynamic systems. Human Factors, 37, 32–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ericsson, K. A., & Kintsch, W. (1995). Long-term working memory. Psychological Review, 102, 211–245.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Funke, J. (2010). Complex problem solving: A case for complex cognition? Cognitive Processing, 11, 133–142.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, I. L. (1993). Training in organisations. Needs assessment, development and evaluation. Monterey: Brooks/Cole.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, I. L., & Ford, J. K. (2002). Training in organisations. Needs assessment, development, and evaluation (4th ed.). Wadsworth: Cengage Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greitzer, F. L., Podmore, R., Robinson, M., & Ey, P. (2009). Naturalistic decision making for power system operators. In Proceedings of the NDM9, the 9th international conference on naturalistic decision making, London, UK. Also available online: http://www.bcs.org/upload/pdf/ewic_ndm09_s1paper2.pdf

  • Hagemann, V., Kluge, A., & Ritzmann, S. (2012). Flexibility under complexity: Work contexts, task profiles and team processes of high responsibility teams. Employee Relations, 34(3), 322–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hodgkinson, G. P., & Healy, M. P. (2008). Cognition in organizations. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 387–417.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hollnagel, E., & Woods, D. D. (2005). Joint cognitive systems. Foundations of cognitive systems engineering. Boca Raton: Taylor & Francis.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Karwowski, W. (2006). The discipline of ergonomics and human factors. In G. Salvendy (Ed.), Handbook of human factors and ergonomics (pp. 3–31). Hoboken: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kluge, A. (2004). Wissenserwerb für das Steuern komplexer Systeme. Lengerich: Pabst.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kluge, A. (2007). Experiential learning methods, simulation complexity and their effects on different target groups. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 36(3), 323–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kluge, A. (2008). What you train is what you get? Task requirements and training methods in complex problem solving. Computers in Human Behavior, 24, 284–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kluge, A., & Schüler, K. (2007). Experience management by means of simulator trainings in high reliability organizations – Re-enacting critical incidents and learning from experience – Examples form nuclear power plants and oil refineries. In N. Gronau (Ed.), 4th conference on professional knowledge management – Experiences and vision (pp. 77–84). Berlin: Gito.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kluge, A., Schüler, K., & Burkolter, D. (2008). Simulatortrainings für Prozesskontrolltätigkeiten am Beispiel von Raffinerien: Psychologische Trainingsprinzipien in der Praxis. Zeitschrift für Arbeitswissenschaft, 62, 97–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kluge, A., Sauer, J., Schüler, K., & Burkolter, D. (2009). Designing training for process control simulators: A review of empirical findings and current practices. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 10, 489–509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kluge, A., Frank, B., Burkolter, D., & Greve, J. (2013). Die Wirkung von Refresher Interventionen auf den Fertigkeitserhalt in der Prozesskontrolle [The impact of refresher interventions on skill retention in process control]. Beitrag auf dem Frühjahrskongress der GfA, in Krefeld, 282.-1.3.2013 (pp.153–156). Dortmund: GfA-Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mittag, W., & Hager, W. (2000). Ein Rahmenkonzept zur Evaluation psychologischer Interventionsmaßnahmen. In W. Hager, J.-L. Patry, & H. Brezing (Hrsg.) Handbuch Evaluation psychologischer Interventionsmaßnahmen. Standards und Kriterien (pp. 102–128). Bern: Huber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moray, N. (1997). Human factors in process control. In G. Salvendy (Ed.), Handbook of human factors and ergonomics (pp. 1944–1971). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagamachi, M. (2002). Relationship among job design, macroergonomics, and productivity. In H. W. Hendrick & B. M. Kleiner (Eds.), Macroergonomics: Theory, methods, and applications (pp. 111–131). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perrow, C. (1984). Normal accidents: Living with high risk technology. New York: Basic Books. (Reprint 1999, by Princeton University Press, Princeton)

    Google Scholar 

  • Proctor, R. W., & van Zandt, T. (2008). Human factors in simple and complex systems (2nd ed.). Boca Raton: CRC press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salas, E., Wilson, K. A., Priest, H. A., & Guthrie, J. W. (2006). Design, delivery, and evaluation of training. In G. Salvendy (Ed.), Handbook of human factors and ergonomics (pp. 472–512). Hoboken: Wiley.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Shrivastava, S., Sonpar, K., & Pazzaglia, F. (2009). Normal accident theory versus high reliability theory: A resolution and call for an open systems view of accidents. Human Relations, 62, 1357–1390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsang, P. S., & Vidulich, M. A. (2006). Mental workload and situation awareness. In G. Salvendy (Ed.), Handbook of human factors and ergonomics (pp. 243–268). Hoboken: Wiley.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Vicente, K. J., Mumaw, R. J., & Roth, E. M. (2004). Operator monitoring in a complex dynamic work environment: A qualitative cognitive model based on field observations. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 5, 359–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vidulich, M. A. (2003). Mental workload and situation awareness. Essential concepts in aviation psychology. In P. S. Tsang & M. A. Vidulich (Eds.), Principles and practice of aviation psychology (pp. 115–147). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weick, K. E., Sutcliffe, K., & Obstfeld, D. (1999). Organizing for high reliability. Research in Organizational Behavior, 21, 81–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weick, K. E., & Sutcliffe, K. M. (2003). Managing the unexpected: Assuring high performance in an age of complexity. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wickens, C. D., & McCarley, J. S. (2008). Applied attention theory. Boca Raton: CRC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wickens, C. D., Lee, J. D., Liu, Y., & Gordon Becker, S. E. (2004). An introduction to human factors engineering (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River: Pearson Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woods, D. D., O’Brien, J. F., & Hanes, L. F. (1987). Human factors challenges in process control: The case of nuclear power plants. In G. Salvendy (Ed.), Handbook of human factors (pp. 1725–1770). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kluge, A. (2014). Why This Book Has Been Written: Purpose and Structure of the Book. In: The Acquisition of Knowledge and Skills for Taskwork and Teamwork to Control Complex Technical Systems. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5049-4_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics