Skip to main content

Inter- and Transdisciplinarity

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Sustainability Ethics and Sustainability Research
  • 2332 Accesses

Abstract

In this chapter, I refer to the existing concepts of interdisciplinarity and transdisciplinarity to discuss some main principles for the design of sustainability research. However, I will provide a specific interpretation and definition of the concepts of inter- and transdisciplinarity, which currently have a rather broad and sometimes vague meaning, to make them fruitful for the design of the new type of sustainability research. I argue for a type of interdisciplinary sustainability research, which integrates different academic disciplines and ethics, and discuss some methodological challenges of this integration. Further, for the purpose of designing a new type of sustainability research, I suggest to extend and redefine the concept of transdisciplinarity. As a characteristic of sustainability research, I define transdisciplinarity as a reorientation of the meta-structure science with regard to the context of all three sustainability relations. This is a broader understanding of transdisciplinarity, which means not just a new social contract (Lubchenco 1998) for science to reorient on society, but rather a new sustainability contract for science to reorient towards the three sustainability relations— i.e. towards society, future generations, and nature.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    For a more detailed discussion of different types of interdisciplinary research, see Baumgärtner and Becker (2005) and Baumgärtner et al. (2008).

  2. 2.

    The concept of transdisciplinarity is also used in a variety of other meanings. Sometimes it is not defined as an interconnection of science and society, but rather as a certain type of interdisciplinarity, e.g., by Costanza et al. (1998) and MittelstraĂź (2001).

References

  • Baumgärtner, S., & Becker, C. (Eds.). (2005). Wissenschaftsphilosophie interdisziplinärer Umweltforschung. Marburg: Metropolis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumgärtner, S., Becker, C., Faber, M., & Manstetten, R. (2006). Relative and absolute scarcity of nature. Assessing the roles of ecology and economics for biodiversity conservation. Ecological Economics, 59, 487–498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumgärtner, S., Becker, C., Frank, K., MĂĽller, B., & Quaas, M. (2008). Relating the philosophy and practice of ecological economics. The role of concepts, models, and case studies in inter- and transdisciplinary sustainability research. Ecological Economics, 67, 384–393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, C. (2006). The human actor in ecological economics: Philosophical approach and research perspectives. Ecological Economics, 60, 17–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, C. (2007). Die Mensch-Umwelt-Beziehung in den Wirtschaftswissenschaften. In T. Knopf (Ed.), Umweltverhalten in Geschichte und Gegenwart (pp. 212–227). TĂĽbingen: Narr.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, C., & Baumgärtner, S. (2005). Einleitung. In S. Baumgärtner & C. Becker (Eds.), Wissenschaftsphilosophie interdisziplinärer Umweltforschung (pp. 9–23). Marburg: Metropolis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Costanza, R., Cumberland, J., Daly, H., Goodland, R., & Norgaard, R. (1998). An introduction to ecological economics. Boca Raton: St. Lucie Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elzinga, A. (2008). Participation. In G. Hirsch Hadorn et al. (Eds.), Handbook of transdisciplinary research (pp. 345–359). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hirsch Hadorn, G. (2002). Unity of knowledge in transdisciplinary research for sustainability. In UNESCO-EOLSS Joint Committee (Ed.), EOLSS—Encyclopedia of life support systems. Oxford: EOLSS Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirsch Hadorn, G., Bradley, D., Pohl, C., Rist, S., & Wiesmann, U. (2006). Implications of transdisciplinarity for sustainability research. Ecological Economics, 60, 119–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirsch Hadorn, G., et al. (Eds.). (2008). Handbook of transdisciplinary research. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lubchenco, J. (1998). Entering the century of environment: A new social contract for science. Science, 279, 491–497.

    Google Scholar 

  • MittelstraĂź, J. (2001). Wissen und Grenzen. Philosophische Studien. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson Klein, J., Grossenbacher-Mansuy, W., Häberli, R., Bill, A., Scholz, R. W., & Welti, M. (Eds.). (2001). Transdisciplinarity: Joint problem solving among science, technology, and society. An effective way for managing complexity. Basel: Birkhäuser.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christian U. Becker .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Science +Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Becker, C.U. (2012). Inter- and Transdisciplinarity. In: Sustainability Ethics and Sustainability Research. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2285-9_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics