Skip to main content

Exploring the Spatially Varying Impact of Urbanization on Water Quality in Eastern Massachusetts Using Geographically Weighted Regression

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Geospatial Technologies in Environmental Management

Part of the book series: Geotechnologies and the Environment ((GEOTECH,volume 3))

Abstract

The impact of urbanization on water quality might vary over space because watershed characteristics, pollution sources, and land use patterns are not the same in different places. However, the spatially varying impact is usually not considered using conventional statistical methods, such as ordinary least squares regression (OLS) and Spearman’s rank correlation analysis. This study applies a geospatial statistical technique, geographically weighted regression (GWR), to analyze the relationships between urbanization and water quality indicators across watersheds with varied urbanization levels in eastern Massachusetts, USA. The study finds that the relationships between water quality and urbanization indicators vary across the urbanization gradient in the studied watersheds. Percentage of developed land and population density are more strongly related to concentrations of water pollutants in less-urbanized areas than in highly-urbanized areas. The adverse impact of urbanization on water quality is more substantial in less-urbanized suburban areas than highly-urbanized central cities, which is associated with the dominant pattern of urbanization in the study area: urban sprawl. The study suggests that GWR is a useful geospatial technology for policy makers, regional and local agencies, and researchers to unveil the local pollution causes, to improve the understanding of local pollution status, and to adopt appropriate environmental and land use planning policies suitable to the local watershed conservation and management.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ahearn DS, Sheibley RW, Dahlgren RA, Anderson M, Johnson J, Tate KW (2005) Land use and land cover influence on water quality in the last free-flowing river draining the western Sierra Nevada California. J Hydrol 313:234–247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aichele SS (2005) Effects of urban land-use change on streamflow and water quality in Oakland County, Michigan, 1970–2003, as inferred from urban gradient and temporal analysis. US Geol Surv Sci Investig Rep 2005–5016

    Google Scholar 

  • Alberti M, Booth D, Hill K, Coburn B, Avolio C, Coe S and Spirandelli D (2007) The impact of urban patterns on aquatic ecosystems: An empirical analysis in Puget lowland sub-basins. Landsc Urban Plan 80:345–361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowen JL, Valiela I (2001) The ecological effects of urbanization of coastal watersheds: historical increases in nitrogen loads and eutrophication of Waquoit Bay estuaries. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 58:1489–1500

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brett MT, Arhonditsis GB, Mueller SE (2005) Non-point-source impacts on stream nutrient concentrations along a forest to urban gradient. Environ Manag 35:330–342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brunsdon C, Fotheringham S, Charlton M (1998) Geographically weighted regression-modeling spatial non-stationarity. Stat 47:431–443

    Google Scholar 

  • Deacon JR, Soule SA, Smith TE (2005) Effects of urbanization on stream quality at selected sites in the seacoast region in New Hampshire, 2001–2003. US Geol Surv Sci Investig Rep 2005–5103

    Google Scholar 

  • Enger ED, Smith BF (2010) Environmental science, 12th edn. McGraw-Hill, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Ewing R, Schmid T, Killingsworth R, Zlot A, Raudenbush S (2003) Relationship between urban sprawl and physical activity, obesity, and morbidity. Am J Health Promot 18:47–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finkenbine JK, Atwater JW, Mavinic DS (2001) Stream health after urbanization. J Am Water Resour Assoc 36:1149–1160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fotheringham AS, Charlton ME, Brunsdon C (2001) Spatial variations in school performance: a local analysis using geographically weighted regression. Geogr Environ Model 5:43–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fotheringham AS, Brunsdon C, Charlton M (2002) Geographically weighted regression: the analysis of spatially varying relationships. Wiley, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatt BE, Fletcher TD, Walsh CJ, Taylor SL (2004) The influence of urban density and drainage infrastructure on the concentrations and loads of pollutants in small streams. Environ Manag 34:112–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Interlandi S, Crockett CS (2003) Recent water quality trends in the Schuylkill River, Pennsylvania, USA: a preliminary assessment of the relative influences of climate, river discharge and suburban development. Water Res 37:1737–1748

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MassGIS (2005) Massachusetts land use datalayers and land use summary statistics http://www.mass.gov/mgis/landuse_stats.htm. Accessed 19 Sep 2005

  • McGrath DA, Evans JP, Smith CK, Haskell DG, Pelkey NW, Gottfried RR, Brockett CD (2004) Mapping land-use change and monitoring the impacts of hardwood-to-pine conversion on the Southern Cumberland Plateau in Tennessee. Earth Interact 8:1–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller JS, Hoel LA (2002) The “smart growth” debate: best practices for urban transportation planning. Socioecon Plan Sci 36:1–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson L, Newell JP, Marzluff JM (2005) Twenty-five years of sprawl in the Seattle region: growth management responses and implications for conservation. Landsc Urban Plan 71:51–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schoonover JE, Lockaby BG, Pan S (2005) Changes in chemical and physical properties of stream water across an urban-rural gradient in western Georgia. Urban Ecosyst 8:107–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shi H, Laurent EJ, LeBouton J, Racevskis L, Hall KR, Donovan M, Doepker RV, Walters MB, Lupi F, Liu J (2006) Local spatial modeling of white-tailed deer distribution. Ecol Model 190: 171–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shore WB (2006) Land-use, transportation and sustainability. Technol Soc 28:27–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tong STY, Chen W (2002) Modeling the relationship between land use and surface water quality. J Environ Manag 66:377–393

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tu J, Xia ZG, Clarke KC, Frei A (2007) Impact of urban sprawl on water quality in eastern Massachusetts, USA. Environ Manag 40:183–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tu J, Xia ZG (2008) Examining spatially varying relationships between land use and water quality using geographically weighted regression I: model design and evaluation. Sci Total Environ 407:358–378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler AP, Angermeier PL, Rosenberger AE (2005) Impacts of new highways and subsequent landscape urbanization on stream habitat and biota. Rev Fish Sci 13:141–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams M, Hopkinson C, Rastetter E, Vallino J, Claessens L (2005) Relationships of land use and stream solute concentrations in the Ipswich River basin, Northeastern Massachusetts. Water Air Soil Pollut 161:55–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson EH, Hurd JD, Civco DL, Prisloe MP, Arnold C (2003) Development of a geospatial model to quantify, describe and map urban growth. Remote Sens Environ 86:275–285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xian G, Crane M, Su J (2007) An analysis of urban development and its environmental impact on the Tampa bay watershed. J Environ Manag 85:965–976

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu D (2006) Spatially varying development mechanisms in the greater Beijing area: a geographically weighted regression investigation. Ann Reg Sci 40:173–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang T (2001) Community features and urban sprawl: the case of the Chicago metropolitan region. Land Use Policy 18:221–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jun Tu .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer Netherlands

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Tu, J. (2010). Exploring the Spatially Varying Impact of Urbanization on Water Quality in Eastern Massachusetts Using Geographically Weighted Regression. In: Hoalst-Pullen, N., Patterson, M. (eds) Geospatial Technologies in Environmental Management. Geotechnologies and the Environment, vol 3. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9525-1_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics