Skip to main content

Resilient Circuits for Dynamic Variation Tolerance

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Emerging Technologies and Circuits

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering ((LNEE,volume 66))

  • 1080 Accesses

Abstract

Integrated circuits are susceptible to dynamic variations in supply voltage (VCC) and temperature. Abrupt changes in die-level switching activity induce large current transients in the power delivery system, resulting in VCC droop and overshoot fluctuations. The magnitude and duration of VCC droops and overshoots depend on the interaction of capacitive and inductive parasitics at the board, package, and die levels with changes in current demand [1]. Temperature variations depend on workload, environmental conditions, and the heat-removal capability of the package. These dynamic variations in VCC and temperature degrade the clock frequency (FCLK) of microprocessors. Conventional designs build a guardband into the operating FCLK to ensure correct functionality within the presence of worst-case dynamic variations. Consequently, these inflexible designs cannot exploit opportunities for higher performance by increasing FCLK or lower power by lowering VCC during favorable operating conditions. Since most systems usually operate at nominal conditions where worst-case scenarios rarely occur, these infrequent dynamic variations severely limit the performance and energy efficiency of conventional microprocessor designs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. A. Muhtaroglu, G. Taylor, T. R. Arabi, On-die droop detector for analog sensing of power supply noise. IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, Apr 2004, pp. 651–660

    Google Scholar 

  2. T. Fischer, J. Desai, B. Doyle, S. Naffziger, B. Patella, A 90-nm variable frequency clock system for a power-managed itanium architecture processor. IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, Jan 2006, pp. 218–228

    Google Scholar 

  3. R. McGowen et al., Power and temperature control on a 90-nm itanium family processor. IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, Jan 2006, pp. 229–237

    Google Scholar 

  4. J. Tschanz et al., Adaptive frequency and biasing techniques for tolerance to dynamic temperature-voltage variations and aging, in IEEE ISSCC Digest of Technical Papers, Feb 2007, pp. 292–293

    Google Scholar 

  5. P. Franco, E.J. McCluskey, Delay testing of digital circuits by output waveform analysis, in Proceedings of the IEEE International Test Conference, Oct 1991, pp. 798–807

    Google Scholar 

  6. P. Franco, E.J. McCluskey, On-line testing of digital circuits, in Proceedings of the IEEE VLSI Test Symposium, Apr 1994, pp. 167–173

    Google Scholar 

  7. M. Nicolaidis, Time redundancy based soft-error tolerance to rescue nanometer technologies, in Proceedings of the IEEE VLSI Test Symposium, Apr 1999, pp. 86–94

    Google Scholar 

  8. D. Ernst et al., Razor: A low-power pipeline based on circuit-level timing speculation, in Proceedings of the IEEE/ACM International Symposium Microarchitecture (MICRO-36), Dec 2003, pp. 7–18

    Google Scholar 

  9. S. Das et al., A self-tuning DVS processor using delay-error detection and correction, IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, Apr 2006, pp. 792–804

    Google Scholar 

  10. K.A. Bowman et al., Energy-efficient and metastability-immune timing-error detection and instruction-replay-based recovery circuits for dynamic-variation tolerance, in IEEE ISSCC Digest of Technical Papers, Feb 2008, pp. 402–403

    Google Scholar 

  11. K.A. Bowman et al., Energy-efficient and metastability-immune resilient circuits for dynamic variation tolerance. IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, Jan 2009, pp. 49–63

    Google Scholar 

  12. D. Blaauw et al., Razor II: In situ error detection and correction for PVT and SER tolerance, in IEEE ISSCC Digest of Technical Papers, Feb. 2008, pp. 400–401

    Google Scholar 

  13. H.J.M. Veendrick, The behavior of flip-flops used as synchronizers and prediction of their failure rate. IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, Apr 1980, pp. 169–176

    Google Scholar 

  14. C.L. Portmann, T.H.Y. Meng, Metastability in CMOS library elements in reduced supply and technology scaled applications. IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, Jan 1995, pp. 39–46

    Google Scholar 

  15. C. Dike, E. Burton, Miller and noise effects in a synchronizing flip-flop. IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, June 1999, pp. 849–855

    Google Scholar 

  16. V. Srinivasan et al., Optimizing pipelines for power and performance, in Proceedings of the International Symposium of Microarchitecture (MICRO-35), Nov 2002, pp. 333–344

    Google Scholar 

  17. A. Hartstein, T.R. Puzak, The optimum pipeline depth considering both power and performance. ACM Transactions on Architecture and Code Optimization (TACO), Dec 2004, pp. 369–388

    Google Scholar 

  18. J. Hennessy, D. Patterson, Computer Architecture a Quantitative Approach, 2nd edn. (Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, San Francisco, CA, 1996)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. P. Bai et al., A 65nm logic technology featuring 35nm gate lengths, enhanced channel strain, 8 Cu interconnect layers, low-k ILD and 0.57 μm2 SRAM cell, in IEEE IEDM Technical Digest, Dec 2004, pp. 657–660

    Google Scholar 

  20. H.L. Yeager, M.J. Patyra, R. Reyes, K.A. Bowman, Microprocessor power optimization through multi-performance device insertion, in IEEE Symposium on VLSI Circuits Digest of Technical Papers, June 2004, pp. 334–337

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bowman, K.A., Tschanz, J.W. (2010). Resilient Circuits for Dynamic Variation Tolerance. In: Amara, A., Ea, T., Belleville, M. (eds) Emerging Technologies and Circuits. Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, vol 66. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9379-0_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9379-0_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-9378-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-90-481-9379-0

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics