Abstract
As was shown earlier, the economic losses and casualties from natural disasters are often fitted by self-similar power-law distributions with heavy tails. If the exponent β of such a distribution does not exceed unity, β ≤ 1, then the mathematical expectation is infinite. In this case, the standard statistical tools, such as sample mean and sample standard deviation, are highly unstable (see Table 1.1). The increase of sample size, in contrast to the ordinary case of finite expectation, does not enhance the accuracy of the sample mean. The large statistical scatter of sample means (which are widely used until today, see e.g., [O1, O2, O3]) makes them inadequate for practical use in problems of loss reduction. We discuss below some approaches to the reliable estimation and prediction of total effects for the cases in which the standard statistical tools are inefficient.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Cramer H (1940) Mathematical methods of statistics. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NY
Embrechts P, Kluppelberg C, Mikosch T (1997a) Modelling extremal events. Berlin-Heidelberg, Springer-Verlag, 645 pp
Efron B (1988) Unconventional methods of multivariate statistical analysis. Finansy i Statistika, Moscow, 264 pp, in Russian
Feller W (1966) An introduction to probability theory and its applications, vol II. Wiley, NY
Gumbel EI (1958) Ststistics of extremes. Columbia University Press, New York
Hardle W (1989) Applied nonparametric regression. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Kagan YY (1994) Observational evidence for earthquakes as a nonlinear dynamic process. Physica D 77:160–192
Knopoff L, Sornette D (1995) Earthquake death tolls. J Phys I (France) 5:1681–1688
Lomnitz C (1994) Fundamentals of earthquake prediction. Willey, New York, 220 p
Nelson JB, Ganze RA (1980) Significant earthquakes 1900–1979: NGSDC-NOAA. World Data Center A, Boulder, 20 p
Osipov VI (1995) Natural disasters in the focus of scientists. Vestnik RAN 65(6):483–495, in Russian
Osipov VI (2001) Natural disasters at the eve of the 21th century. Geoekologiya 4:293–309, in Russian
Osipov VI (2002) Natural Hazard Control. Vestnik RAN 8:678–686, in Russian
Pisarenko VF (1991) Statistical estimation of the maximum possible earthquake. Fizika Zemli 9:38–46, in Russian
Pisarenko VF (1995) On the best statistical estimator of the maximum possible earthquake magnitude. Dokl RAN 344(2):237–239, in Russian
Pisarenko VF (1998) Nonlinear growth of cumulative flood losses with time. Hydrol Process 12:461–470
Pisarenko VF, Lyubushin AA, Lysenko VB, Golubeva TV (1996) Statistical estimation of seismic hazard parameters: maximum possible magnitude and related parameters. Bull Seismol Soc Am 86(3):691–700
Pisarenko VF, Lysenko VB (1997) The probability distribution for the maximum earthquake that can occur during a fixed time interval. Fizika Zemli 6:15–23, in Russian
Sornette D, Knopoff L, Kagan YY, Vanneste C (1996) Rank-ordering statistics of extreme events: application to the distribution of large earthquakes. J Geophys Res 101(6):13883–13893
Hill, B.M. (1975) A simple general approach to inference about the tail of a distribution. Ann.Statist., 3, 1163–1174
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2010 Springer Netherlands
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Pisarenko, V., Rodkin, M. (2010). Nonlinear and Linear Growth of Cumulative Effects of Natural Disasters. In: Heavy-Tailed Distributions in Disaster Analysis. Advances in Natural and Technological Hazards Research, vol 30. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9171-0_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9171-0_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-9170-3
Online ISBN: 978-90-481-9171-0
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)