Skip to main content

Nonlinear and Linear Growth of Cumulative Effects of Natural Disasters

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Heavy-Tailed Distributions in Disaster Analysis

Part of the book series: Advances in Natural and Technological Hazards Research ((NTHR,volume 30))

  • 753 Accesses

Abstract

As was shown earlier, the economic losses and casualties from natural disasters are often fitted by self-similar power-law distributions with heavy tails. If the exponent β of such a distribution does not exceed unity, β ≤ 1, then the mathematical expectation is infinite. In this case, the standard statistical tools, such as sample mean and sample standard deviation, are highly unstable (see Table 1.1). The increase of sample size, in contrast to the ordinary case of finite expectation, does not enhance the accuracy of the sample mean. The large statistical scatter of sample means (which are widely used until today, see e.g., [O1, O2, O3]) makes them inadequate for practical use in problems of loss reduction. We discuss below some approaches to the reliable estimation and prediction of total effects for the cases in which the standard statistical tools are inefficient.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Cramer H (1940) Mathematical methods of statistics. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NY

    Google Scholar 

  2. Embrechts P, Kluppelberg C, Mikosch T (1997a) Modelling extremal events. Berlin-Heidelberg, Springer-Verlag, 645 pp

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. Efron B (1988) Unconventional methods of multivariate statistical analysis. Finansy i Statistika, Moscow, 264 pp, in Russian

    Google Scholar 

  4. Feller W (1966) An introduction to probability theory and its applications, vol II. Wiley, NY

    Google Scholar 

  5. Gumbel EI (1958) Ststistics of extremes. Columbia University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hardle W (1989) Applied nonparametric regression. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kagan YY (1994) Observational evidence for earthquakes as a nonlinear dynamic process. Physica D 77:160–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Knopoff L, Sornette D (1995) Earthquake death tolls. J Phys I (France) 5:1681–1688

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Lomnitz C (1994) Fundamentals of earthquake prediction. Willey, New York, 220 p

    Google Scholar 

  10. Nelson JB, Ganze RA (1980) Significant earthquakes 1900–1979: NGSDC-NOAA. World Data Center A, Boulder, 20 p

    Google Scholar 

  11. Osipov VI (1995) Natural disasters in the focus of scientists. Vestnik RAN 65(6):483–495, in Russian

    Google Scholar 

  12. Osipov VI (2001) Natural disasters at the eve of the 21th century. Geoekologiya 4:293–309, in Russian

    Google Scholar 

  13. Osipov VI (2002) Natural Hazard Control. Vestnik RAN 8:678–686, in Russian

    Google Scholar 

  14. Pisarenko VF (1991) Statistical estimation of the maximum possible earthquake. Fizika Zemli 9:38–46, in Russian

    Google Scholar 

  15. Pisarenko VF (1995) On the best statistical estimator of the maximum possible earthquake magnitude. Dokl RAN 344(2):237–239, in Russian

    Google Scholar 

  16. Pisarenko VF (1998) Nonlinear growth of cumulative flood losses with time. Hydrol Process 12:461–470

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Pisarenko VF, Lyubushin AA, Lysenko VB, Golubeva TV (1996) Statistical estimation of seismic hazard parameters: maximum possible magnitude and related parameters. Bull Seismol Soc Am 86(3):691–700

    Google Scholar 

  18. Pisarenko VF, Lysenko VB (1997) The probability distribution for the maximum earthquake that can occur during a fixed time interval. Fizika Zemli 6:15–23, in Russian

    Google Scholar 

  19. Sornette D, Knopoff L, Kagan YY, Vanneste C (1996) Rank-ordering statistics of extreme events: application to the distribution of large earthquakes. J Geophys Res 101(6):13883–13893

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Hill, B.M. (1975) A simple general approach to inference about the tail of a distribution. Ann.Statist., 3, 1163–1174

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to V. Pisarenko .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer Netherlands

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Pisarenko, V., Rodkin, M. (2010). Nonlinear and Linear Growth of Cumulative Effects of Natural Disasters. In: Heavy-Tailed Distributions in Disaster Analysis. Advances in Natural and Technological Hazards Research, vol 30. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9171-0_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics